ISSN 2330-717X

Protests Of National Anthem Restore My Faith In Humanity – OpEd

By

Speaking out against racism is one thing — and a wonderful and admirable thing it is — but choosing to do so by sitting out the U.S. national anthem, and then having others join in, or “come out” as routine national anthem sitters: this is fantastic!

A self-governing republic of thinking people (whose first thought should be “My god, what are we doing to the rest of the planet with all this pollution and all these wars?”) ought to have no use for mandatory flag worship, required hand positions, or enforced recitations of pledges of allegiance to colored bits of cloth. Or if only some people outgrow such practices, others ought to leave them alone about it.

The protest thus far is severely limited, of course. The primary reason that it is useful to break down required patriotism rituals is their intimate connection to militarism. Yet many are claiming other motives and swearing their steadfast allegiance to militarism. That’s OK. It’s still an enormous step, and one that thousands are thanking Colin Kaepernick for taking.

Of course the endless wars abroad fuel racism at home, and vice versa. The endless military budget unloads free war weapons on police, and free trainers in war mentality. The bombs dropped abroad still explode in the ghetto. And militarists are claiming just the opposite, in support of Kaepernick, alleging that bombing Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and Libya somehow creates Kaepernick’s “freedom” to sit out the national anthem while catching hell mostly from enthusiastic war supporters. Nonetheless, breaking a taboo is a tremendous first step to be followed by many more.

My concern with the national anthem and all such related ceremonies is chiefly the obedience and subservience to symbols of mass murder. But secondarily, the lyrics of the full song, and the earlier version of it, are absolutely unacceptable. That the third verse celebrates killing people who had just escaped from slavery, that the earlier version celebrated killing Muslims, and that the lyricist himself, Francis Scott Key, owned people as slaves and supported police killings of African Americans while shouting about “freedom” — these are all insurmountable hurdles if you’re trying to get me to respect or identify with this song that, let’s face it, is also awful as a piece of music.

But strip the song down to its current first verse, and it remains a celebration of war, of the mass killing of human beings, of a war of conquest that failed to take over Canada and instead got the White House burned. And during the course of that valorous piece of blood-soaked stupidity, Key witnessed a battle in which human beings died but a flag survived. And I’m supposed to stand, like an obedient mindless robot, and worship that glorious incident, and it’s supposed to matter what I do with my hand, but not what I do with my brain?

Nations don’t have to find their whole identity in war. The United States could celebrate democratic advances, heroic activists, rights won for all variety of previously disfavored groups. We could sing a song about creative nonviolence, generosity, bravery, kindness, and natural beauty. We could sing a song that offered friendship to the other 96% of humanity. We could have a widely covered national contest for the best new song, and perhaps bump these two hideous presidential candidates off the airwaves for a few moments.

Instead, it’s the Star Mangled Banner over and over and over. And, yes, I’ve been sitting it out for years. Welcome, Colin. We’ve been waiting for you.

Source: DavidSwanson.org


Enjoy the article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


David Swanson

David Swanson

David Swanson's books include "War Is A Lie." He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and War Is A Crime and works for Roots Action. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @davidcnswanson and FaceBook.

One thought on “Protests Of National Anthem Restore My Faith In Humanity – OpEd

  • September 2, 2016 at 5:05 pm
    Permalink

    I think the author has stated the truth about the national anthem. I would like to specify the points the author has indicated. The first racist and chauvinistic was directed towards the Muslims of the Arab world after the what is called the first Barbary War with Algiers 1801-1806 and the second war in 1815.
    In conflict resistless each toil they endur’d,
    Till their foes shrunk dismay’d from the war’s desolation:
    And pale beamed the Crescent, its splendor obscur’d
    By the light of the star-bangled flag of our nation.
    Where each flaming star gleamed a meteor of war,
    And the turban’d head bowed to the terrible glare.
    Then mixt with the olive the laurel shall wave
    And form a bright wreath for the brow of the brave

    How they fought, how they fell, in the midst of their glory,
    How triumphant they rode, o’er the wandering fl ood,
    And stain’d the blue waters with infidel blood;
    How mixt with the olive, the laurel did wave,
    And form a bright wreath for the brow of the brave.”
    …..

    And on the Black people who fought for their freedom from American white slave owners and were killed. Mr. Kay said about them:
    No refuge could save the hireling and slave
    From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
    And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave,
    O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    Moreover, the national anthem does believe and support terrorism against people. Given these facts which are inconsistent with reality and diversity, USA has to change the national anthem in order for people to stand up for it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CLOSE
CLOSE