ISSN 2330-717X

Global Ban On Killer Robots Vital For Ensuring Human Control Over Weapons Of War – Analysis

By

By J Nastranis

The widespread deployment of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) – commonly known as “killer robots” – capable of operating with minimal human oversight, is likely to transform the future battlefield, accelerating the pace of fighting and delegating many critical battle decisions to machines, the Arms Control Association (ACA) has warned.

According to the ACA Executive Director Daryl G. Kimball, the unregulated deployment of LAWS could in fact lead to violations of the Law of War and international humanitarian law and increase the risk of uncontrolled escalation in a major-power crisis.

“Technologies now in development could endow machines with the capacity to search for, identify, and kill humans on the battlefield or to hunt for and destroy an adversary’s nuclear deterrent systems, possibly igniting a nuclear exchange,” alerts Kimball.

He is therefore urging the U.S. “to act more responsibly and call upon all governments represented at the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) to support the initiation of negotiations on autonomous weapons” at their meeting set for November 21-23, 2018 in Geneva, and to help craft “an outcome ensuring continued human control over weapons of war and the decision to employ lethal force.”

Such an agreement would appear to be within the realm of possibility. A significant number of governments have concluded that the use of fully autonomous weapons can never be reconciled with international humanitarian law and have advocated the adoption of a legally binding ban on such munitions.

Others have called for a nonbinding measure incorporating some basic principles on LAWS, like the necessity for ultimate human control. But a small minority, including the world’s major weapons producers, Russia and the U.S. argue against any new measures regulating lethal autonomous weapons systems or killer robots.

Kimball reminds that for four years, signatory states to the CCW – a treaty signed in 1980 with the aim of eliminating munitions deemed excessively cruel or injurious – have sought to assess the potential dangers posed by autonomous weapons and to consider whether new measures were needed to control them.

Most recently this investigative task was entrusted to a Group of Governmental Experts (GGE), which most recently met August 28-30, 2018 in Geneva. “The experts agreed by consensus that humans should always retain ultimate control over weapons systems, but they failed to agree on a path forward other than to continue further expert-level discussions in 2019.”

The ACA Executive Director contends that in view of the rapid progress in autonomous weaponry research and development and given that many autonomous weapons systems are moving rapidly toward deployment, “it is past time for responsible governments to act.”

Current policies and practices are clearly insufficient to address the dangers posed by LAWS, avers Kimball. The U.S. government’s guidelines, outlined in a 2012 Department of Defense directive, say that such systems should allow for “appropriate levels of human judgment” over the use of lethal force. But what constitutes “appropriate”?

Kimball argues: “The Group of Governmental Experts, which began their deliberations in 2016, has had ample time to investigate the dangers posed by autonomous weapons. Although important technical issues regarding definitions relating to LAWS remain, we believe that the time for discussion is over and that the dangers of deploying lethal autonomous weapons have been sufficiently demonstrated to warrant the initiation of formal negotiations on meaningful control mechanisms.”

The appropriate place for these to begin is at the next meeting of the CCW’s High Contracting Parties, set for November 21-23, 2018 in Geneva.

Indubitably there are differences among member states on what sort of limits to place on lethal autonomous weapons, if at all, says Kimball. “But as the U.S. has argued in another negotiating forum, the Conference on Disarmament (which also operates by consensus), negotiations do not assume any particular outcome but allow for careful consideration of competing proposals.”

Kimball is therefore urging the U.S. to contribute its share to trigger the negotiations among all governments represented in the CCW on killer robots at their meeting in November and to help hammer out an agreement ensuring continued human control over weapons of war and the decision to employ these.


Enjoy the article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


IDN

IDN

IDN-InDepthNews offers news analyses and viewpoints on topics that impact the world and its peoples. IDN-InDepthNews serves as flagship of the International Press Syndicate Group, partner of the Global Cooperation Council.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CLOSE
CLOSE

Notice: Undefined variable: font_family in /home/eurasiar_bak/public_html/wp-content/plugins/gdpr-cookie-compliance/moove-modules.php on line 282