Ron Paul: Interventionist Policies Make Us Less Secure – OpEd

By

Last week the House passed yet another bill placing sanctions on Iran and Syria, bringing us closer to another war in the Middle East. We are told that ever harsher sanctions finally will force the targeted nations to bend to our will. Yet the ineffectiveness of previous sanctions teaches us nothing; in truth sanctions lead to war more than they prevent war.

Until last year, Libyan sanctions were touted as a great success story. The regime would change its behavior. Yet NATO bombed the country anyway.

Last week we learned that President Obama signed an intelligence “finding” directing the CIA to covertly assist rebels in Syria. The administration seems determined to fight yet another war in Syria that has nothing to do with American national interests.

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

We already know that a similar “finding” was signed under the latest Bush administration directing US intelligence to undermine the Iranian government and promote regime change there. Neoconservatives have long demanded that we overthrow the Syrian government before moving on to war against Iran. This bellicosity continues regardless of which party is in the White House.

In Syria we see once again we see how our interventionist policies backfire and make us less secure. Recent news reports point to ties between the Syrian opposition and al-Qaeda (and other extremist groups). A recent article in the Guardian, a British newspaper, exclaimed that, “Al-Qaida turns tide for rebels in battle for eastern Syria.” The article quotes an al-Qaeda leader in Syria saying that he meets with the main US-backed Syrian rebel organization, the Free Syrian Army, “almost every day.” So by promoting civil war in Syria we end up fueling al-Qaeda.

According to another recent press report, German intelligence services estimate that nearly 100 terrorist attacks have been committed by al-Qaeda or related organizations in Syria over the past six months. Last month a suicide bomber in Syria killed a defense minister and several top government officials. The US government, which has been fighting a “War on Terror” for more than a decade now, refused to condemn that act of terrorism.

This raises the question of whether the US administration is supporting the same people in Syria that we have been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressed these same concerns earlier this year when asked whether the US has been reluctant to arm the Syrian rebels. She answered, “To whom are you delivering them? We know al-Qaida. Zawahiri is supporting the opposition in Syria. Are we supporting al-Qaida in Syria?”

That is a very good question. It clearly demonstrates that the United States has no business at all being involved in the Syrian civil war. In the 1980s we supported a resistance movement in Afghanistan that later gave birth to elements of al-Qaeda and the Taliban. When will we learn our lesson and stop intervening in conflicts we don’t truly understand, conflicts that have nothing to do with American national interests?

Ron Paul

Ronald Ernest "Ron" Paul (born August 20, 1935) is an American physician, author, and politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 14th congressional district, which includes Galveston. He was a three-time candidate for President of the United States, as a Libertarian in 1988 and as a Republican in 2008 and 2012.

Source: Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

To ensure Eurasia Review continues to operate, please click on the donate button below. We thank you in advance.

Help Eurasia Review

4 thoughts on “Ron Paul: Interventionist Policies Make Us Less Secure – OpEd”

  1. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney represent the “same as usual” while Ron Paul represents real “change”.

    The leftist anti-war movement was very vocal during the Bush years but now is very hypocritically-quiet during Obama’s war-mongering. The excessive war-mongering capacity of the neo-cons is well known and, so, Romney’s stance is no surprise.

    The USA/World needs someone with conviction, not someone who has refined the art of flip-flopping.

    The USA/World needs Ron Paul.

  2. Go Ron Paul. We need your “Common Sense.” Not another neo-con puppet to bring us more war and more debt.

  3. Mr. Ron Paul ..im the romanian who support you ..i bet you will win this long battle ..and i hope in one day to restore the name of United States of America ..and finish with the racism forever and the ones who distroy this world to be prosecuted
    thank you for being my friend

  4. Unfortunately, the American people are sheeple and believe their government acts in their best interest when in fact they are only acting in the best interest of the people who make money off of war.
    But, their is hope. Ron Paul has been planting the seeds of liberty throughout American colleges and a new generation of liberty minded people are ready for battle and, will win the war.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>