The Senate side of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C
The Senate side of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C


CIA’s Harsh Interrogation Techniques Beyond Legal – US Senate Report

By

The CIA’s enhanced interrogation program was not approved by the US Justice Department and impeded White House investigations, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded in the summary of a new report obtained Thursday by the McClatchy news agency.

“The techniques included waterboarding, which produces a sensation of drowning, stress positions, sleep deprivation for up to 11 days at a time, confinement in a cramped box, slaps and slamming detainees into walls. The CIA held detainees in secret ‘black site’ prisons overseas and abducted others who it turned over to foreign governments for interrogation,” McClatchy’s Washington Bureau said.

The report summary also suggests the CIA failed to present investigators with an accurate number of individuals it detained and subjected to the controversial interrogation methods, which were not approved by the Department of Justice or authorized by CIA headquarters. By providing false information, the intelligence agency misled the White House and Congress about the value of data extracted from terrorist suspects.

The report, weighing in at over 6,000 pages, came as a result of a four-year investigation. Last week, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to make the final report public. The documents have now gone to the president for de-classification.

Moscow has repeatedly expressed deep concern over human rights violations in the US. Konstantin Dolgov, the Russian Foreign Ministry Commissioner for Human Rights, said last week that by delaying declassification of the US Senate Report, the Obama administration has violated the Convention Against Torture.

Dolgov also noted that leaks in the media indicate the internal investigation by US authorities might have revealed previously undisclosed methods of torture.

A Russian delegation headed by Dolgov recently visited the US military jail at Guantanamo Bay to meet a Russian prisoner and convince Washington to close down the facility. Since it was established in 2002, the Guantanamo Bay detention camp has been the target of criticism by human rights activists and many international government officials, who have condemned its controversial interrogation methods and the dubious legality of holding prisoners indefinitely without charging them with crimes.

Force-feeding is one of the most notorious techniques used in Guantanamo. It involves the use of force and physical restraints to immobilize hunger strikers without their consent and compel them to take food, especially by means of a tube inserted into the throat. The UN Human Rights Commission also condemned force-feeding at Guantanamo as both a form of torture and a breach of international law.

Ria Novosti

RIA Novosti is Russia's leading news agency in terms of multimedia technologies, website audience reach and quoting by the Russian media.

One thought on “CIA’s Harsh Interrogation Techniques Beyond Legal – US Senate Report”

  1. I really detest this wriggling around the fact that we tortured these unfortunate men by calling our deeds ‘enhanced’ or ‘harsh’ interrogation. It has been a long time since we could see ourselves as a law-abiding and decent nation, but the torture carried out at
    Guantanamo and at black sites elsewhere represent the destruction of our nation’s reputation as a leader of the free world, and a nation concerned with human rights.
    I also have no confidence in this presidential review of the report; everything we really need to know will be redacted. We have to face facts: we have a government largely corrupt and out of control, as the NSA, the CIA, the FBI and other secret agencies illustrate. Congress has never and will never supervise these rogue agencies, nor will we ever get an accounting of our use of drones and the many innocent people whose lives are destroyed by their cowardly attacks. I say cowardly because these targeted people have no chance to save themselves. It’s the equivalent of shooting ducks in a pond. And claiming they are “linked” to terrorism is a use of language that would make George Orwell spin in his grave. I am not a particular fan of the
    “founders” that some people so revere, but I think they would be appalled to see what we have made of their experiment in self-government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>