Oil Find Reported In Arctic Sooner Than ExpectedBy Andrei Fedyashin Oil fever could strike the Arctic sooner than expected and is likely to be accompanied by a ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 32 | Comments Read more |
India Re-Calibrating Af-Pak StrategyAs the US seeks to pull out of Afghanistan and evidence of Pakistani collusion with the Taliban becomes clearer, India ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 40 | Comments Read more |
After Mubarak: Egypt And The Succession IssueBy Riad Kahwaji and Dr. Theodore Karasik All eyes are turning towards Egypt and who will succeed Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 53 | Comments Read more |
China's Climate Change Policy: Domestic And Global ImplicationsBy D.S.RajanThe People’s Republic of China (PRC) deserves full credit for its pro-active approach towards combating global warming and climate ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 110 | Comments Read more |
India Misses Opportunity For Humanitarian Intervention In Gilgit-BaltistanThe Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) area of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) was one of the first and worst to be affected by the ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 64 | Comments Read more |
The Upcoming Nalanda UniversityBy P. K. GautamThe new Nalanda University now being planned to be rebuilt will soon provide momentum to the systematic ... Analysis | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 81 | Comments Read more |
New Developments In Military AutomationAs thousands of US soldiers leave the Iraqi battlefield, the US military ramps up efforts to increase unmanned and automated ... Analysis | Wednesday, 1 September 2010 | Hits: 83 | Comments Read more |
Yet Another Great Game In Afghanistan: The US And ChinaBy Sriparna PathakThe United Nations (UN) Human Development Report of 2009 rated Afghanistan as the world’s second most impoverished country. ... Analysis | Wednesday, 1 September 2010 | Hits: 131 | Comments Read more |
Defining The Obama Doctrine, Its Pitfalls And How To Avoid ThemBy Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D. and James Carafano, Ph.D. American Presidents become known for “signature” statements and responses to foreign policy ... Analysis | Wednesday, 1 September 2010 | Hits: 106 | Comments Read more |
It is sadly unsurprising that Prime Minister Cameron's highly publicized trip to Turkey went with no mention of that country's continued denial of the Armenian Genocide, and its suppression of Kurdish and Armenian minorities. Indeed when Turkish leader Erdogan discussed his threats of ethnically cleansing Armenians in the UK, Gordon Brown made no more comment on the matter than if Erdogan had been discussing his favorite television programs.
It is in keeping with that conspiracy of silence, that Cameron made no mention of the thousands of political prisoners in Turkish jails, there often for merely expressing an opinion at odds with the state, for singing a folk song, or delivering an official speech in Kurdish. Naturally Cameron did not think to raise the issue of Leyla Zana, the first Kurdish woman elected to the Turkish parliament and a winner of the Sakharov Prize, who is still in jail today. Cameron could have at least raised the subject of Aysel Tuğluk, a member of the Turkish Human Rights Association, who was illegally stripped of her parliamentary immunity and sent to jail for handing out leaflets in the Kurdish language, and is now due to be sent to jail yet again.
But rather than standing up for human rights, Cameron instead pandered to the radical Islamists who were his hosts, by feeding their appetite for hate directed at Israel. And it did not begin or end with Israel.
Instead Cameron sold out the rest of Europe, declaring that he was "angry" at how long the negotiations to bring Turkey into the EU were taking, and declaring himself the "strongest possible advocate for EU membership". He slammed France and implicitly Germany, for refusing to rush forward to support bringing Turkey into the EU. Cameron sided with Turkey, over France and Germany, betraying allies for enemies. And worse was yet to come.
Not only did Cameron ignore Turkey's ongoing occupation of Cyprus, but he signed a strategic agreement with Turkey that calls for ending the "isolation" of the Turkish Cypriots by upholding their "right to representation" in the European Parliament, and promoting political and cultural contacts with the Turkish Cypriots. What that means is that Cameron committed himself to supporting Dervis Eroglu from the radical National Unity Party, which calls for Turkish annexation of occupied Cyprus. The strategic agreement signed by Cameron, moves the UK closer to recognizing the Turkish occupation of Cyprus, which currently only Turkey itself recognizes.
Again Cameron makes no criticism whatsoever of Turkey's illegal occupation of Cyprus. He does not mention the fact that he signed an agreement promoting the flow of goods from occupied Cyprus to the UK, while Turkey refuses to accept goods from Greek Cyprus. Of course not. No more than his predecessor was willing to.
Did Cameron do any of this out of principle? Nonsense. Cameron knows as well as anyone about Turkey's state of domestic terror, its persecution of the political opposition, and how unworkable Turkish membership in the EU would be. Instead like Brown before him, Cameron pandered to the Turkish thug-in-chief for a few pounds, hoping to boost British exports to Turkey. In the hope of a few million pounds, Cameron betrayed fellow European nations, signed off on Turkey's occupation of Cyprus, ignored the thousands of political prisoners in Turkish jails, and whitewashed Turkey's real record on Islamic terrorism. And while he and his businessmen friends beamed and shook hands with Turkey's chief terrorist-- others were left to stand up against the violence and brutality of the Turkish regime on their own.
In his rambling speech, Cameron praised Turkey for fighting against terrorism. The reality however is that the only "terrorism" that Turkey fights against, is Kurdish guerrillas, from its large Kurdish minority who want to have their own state, or at least some basic human rights. And when Cameron shook hands with Erdogan, he was shaking hands with a man whose patron, Yassin Qadi, funneled millions of dollars to Al Queda, and whose own advisor, Cuneyt Zapsu, donated 300,000 dollars to Al Queda. Al Queda operates its magazine freely in Istanbul, which is convenient because Erdogan claims there's no such thing as Islamic terrorism.
If Turkey, as Cameron says, is guarding the flank of Europe... then who in G-d's name is guarding Europe from Turkey? Certainly not Cameron.
Cameron's despicable toadying to Turkey's Thug-in-Chief was one long collection of lies. In his speech, he claimed that "Europe will draw fresh vigour and purpose from a Turkey that embraces human rights and democracy". Turkey's democracy is such that its opposition is routinely jailed. Its human rights has sent 12 year olds to prison for singing folk songs. It has no concept of democracy or human rights. Its 10,000 political prisoners could testify to that. Almost a 1000 of them opposition politicians.
The sham continued as Cameron congratulated Turkey on "its efforts to achieve the ambition of zero problems with all its neighbours, including Iraq". This after Turkish troops repeatedly invaded Iraq just just last month, murdering a 15 year old girl, among others. The Iraqi government protested, to no effect. Cameron, who is supposed to be committed to guaranteeing Iraq's security, instead shamelessly praises the invaders. The only casualties he mentions are those of the Turkish invading forces, not their victims. Never their victims.
And so it goes. Cameron babbles on about Turkey's religious tolerance, while the level of hateful incitement spirals out of control. He talks about the true tolerant Islam, to a man who was at one point imprisoned for his own Islamic radicalism. He takes up arms against all those damned obstructionists who are preventing a lovely regime like Erdogan's Turkey from joining the EU. He vows to fight them everywhere, like a latter day Churchill, proclaiming not, "There will always be an England", but rather, "There will always be a Turkey in the EU".
If there was any Turk in that room who had the slightest respect for England before Cameron began to speak, it was sure to have vanished in a whiff of contempt. Cameron's speech reminds one of English socialists visiting the Soviet Union and heaping praise on Stalin and the wonderful revolution, before going off to collect their blood money. And now Cameron has done them one better, demanding that a radical Islamist regime share open borders with the EU.
In a speech given while Erdogan prepares to round up political opponents before the election on fraudulent charges of "inciting" Kurdish riots-- Cameron made only one criticism of human rights. Not of Turkey of course. Or of Erdogan, who has jailed about as many of his opponents as Saddam Hussein. No, Cameron courageously blasted Israel, for standing up to Erdogan's IHH thugs, after they beat and stabbed Israeli soldiers inspecting their flotilla carrying aid to Hamas run Gaza.
Cameron blasted the response of Israeli soldiers who fired back after they Turkish Islamist thugs tried to murder them, as "completely unacceptable" and called Gaza, a "prison camp". He demanded a "swift, transparent and rigorous" inquiry. No such demand was of course issued to his hosts for their 10,000 political prisoners, their illegal invasion of Iraq and murder of civilians-- or that Armenian genocide matter. Of course no inquiries are demanded there.
Let us be clear what Cameron has done. He has sold out Europe and the free world by signing on the dotted of an agreement which explicitly trades English support for EU membership for increased exports. This is about money, pure and simple. There are no principles of any kind here. And what does Europe get out of all this? Here is a brief preview of coming attractions;
It is mainly young people who take to the streets, with Turkish flags in their hands, whistles in their mouths and hatred in their eyes.
"We have waited long enough," reads one poster. "Allah wants this war," is the message on another.
European tolerance Islamized Turkey. The pandering of unprincipled leaders like Cameron will take it to the brink and beyond.
Daniel Greenfield is a columnist born in Israel and currently living in New York City. He is a contributing editor at Family Security Matters and writes a daily blog column on Islamic Terrorism, Israeli and American politics and Europe's own clash of civilizations which can be found at Sultanknish.blogspot.com.
When Markets FailOne of the great mantras of the modern economics profession is that markets know best, and that the ... Read more |
Black Civil Rights Mafia Betrays Black AmericaI am a black man alerting my fellow Americans about a tremendous evil which is going on in our great ... Read more |
The War Of ClimateThermometer measurements show that the earth has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit since the Industrial Revolution, when humans began ... Read more |
Qaddafi's Remarks On Preventing A 'Black Europe' UnacceptableIn the 41 years since Muammar Qaddafi seized power in Libya, he has earned himself a reputation for political views ... Read more |
Interview With Lev PonomarevRussia-watchers are no doubt aware of the recent arrest of my good friend Lev Ponomarev. Lev is one of ... Read more |
New Orleans, Mr. O And Mr. GoFive years ago this week, a beast drowned New Orleans. Don't blame Katrina: the lady never, in fact, touched the ... Read more |
Burning Down The US House MarketThe howls of surprised economists were everywhere last week as the government reported on Tuesday that July had the sharpest single-month plunge in existing home sales on ... Experts | Thursday, 2 September 2010 | Hits: 20 | Comments Read more |
Are The Millennium Development Goals Counter-Productive?By Oladiran Bello The EU’s discourse on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) remains unhelpfully inward-looking. Heavy on chest-beating reassertions of Europe’s unmatched development spending, the official rhetoric falls short on concrete ... Experts | Wednesday, 1 September 2010 | Hits: 92 | Comments Read more |