Amnesty International Report Condemns Revival Of 1930s-Style ‘Us-Them’ Rhetoric – OpEd

Many governments around the world over the last year have cynically revived 1930s-style rhetoric of dividing people into “us” and “them” and the movement away from the defense of human rights by major countries is pushing others to adopt “an analogous course,” according to Amnesty International’s annual report.

In 2016, Salil Shetti, Amnesty International’s secretary general says, many leaders “began to use rhetoric directed at the dehumanization of whole groups of the population, refugees and migrants, foreigners and representatives of other confessions” in order to gain power by “manipulating collective identity” (amnesty.org.ru/ru/air201617/).

“Ever more leaders of states and politicians who call themselves battlers against the establishment are introducing policies based on persecution, dehumanization and blaming particular groups of people for social problems,” thus undermining human rights in general and opening the way to repression.

The 175-page report on the state of human rights in 159 countries says that “the situation in the former USSR is generating growing concern.” In most former Soviet republics, it says, “repressions of dissidents and the political opposition continued.” The situation in Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Belarus was “especially bad,” and both Russia and Azerbaijan continued to limit the space “for basic freedoms.”

Over the course of 2016, civil society in Russia continued to lose ground to state repression. Ever more NGOs were put on the register of “foreign agents,” and three foreign NGOs were declared “undesirable organizations.” Moreover, the regime “ever more actively used anti-extremist laws against is opponents.”

In Tajikistan and Kazakhstan, Amnesty International continues, the human rights situation in Tajikistan and Kazakhstan continued to deteriorate rapidly. And as in 2014-2015, the conflict in the Donbass “negatively affected the situation with regard to human rights in Ukraine.”

Both the Ukrainian government and the pro-Moscow forces in the eastern portion of Ukraine violated the rights of many, with the latter seriously restricting the media to work freely on the territories of the “’self-proclaimed’” republics and the former violating media rights as well.

In Crimea, which Russia illegally annexed in 2014, the situation is far worse, with the occupiers restricting the rights of residents far more severely than Kyiv. The particular target of such abuse, Amnesty says, are the members of the Crimean Tatar Milli Mejlis, civic activists and independent journalists.


Enjoy the article?

Did you find this article informative? Please consider contributing to Eurasia Review, as we are truly independent and do not receive financial support from any institution, corporation or organization.


 

Paul Goble

Paul Goble

Paul Goble is a longtime specialist on ethnic and religious questions in Eurasia. Most recently, he was director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy. Earlier, he served as vice dean for the social sciences and humanities at Audentes University in Tallinn and a senior research associate at the EuroCollege of the University of Tartu in Estonia. He has served in various capacities in the U.S. State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the International Broadcasting Bureau as well as at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Goble maintains the Window on Eurasia blog and can be contacted directly at [email protected] .

One thought on “Amnesty International Report Condemns Revival Of 1930s-Style ‘Us-Them’ Rhetoric – OpEd

  • February 26, 2017 at 8:26 pm
    Permalink

    I read the article and said this has to have been written by Paul. Sure enough when I checked the author it was PAUL G.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CLOSE
CLOSE