Is Letting Pakistan Collapse An Option?

“The News”, a daily of Pakistan, has carried on December 24, 2010, an analysis by Amir Mir, the well-known Pakistani journalist, of acts of suicide terrorism in Pakistan during 2010. It covers data up to December 23.

According to this analysis, till December 23, there were 52 acts of suicide terrorism resulting in 1224 fatalities as against 80 acts in 2009 with 1217 fatalities. Though the number of suicide attacks came down from 80 in 2009 to 52, the lethality of the attacks increased with the largest number of fatalities in a year since the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the anti-Shia Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LEJ) and their associates such as the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) and the Islamic Jihad Union (IJU), another Uzbek group, stepped up their acts of suicide terrorism after the Army raid in the Lal Masjid of Islamabade in July,2007.

According to Amir Mir, the number of fatalities due to suicide terrorism rose from 837 in 2007 to 965 in 2008. It went up to 1217 in 2009 and 1224 till December 23,2010. During 2010, the largest number of attacks were in the Khyber Pakhtunkwa province (KP) with 25 attacks resulting in 416 fatalities. There were 12 suicide attacks in the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) with 381 fatalities followed by Punjab with seven acts of suicide terrorism resulting in 312 fatalities. There were four incidents in Balochistan with 81 deaths, two in Sindh with 28 deaths and another two in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) with six deaths.

The Pashtun belt in KP and the FATA continued to be the worst affected. Thirty-seven of the 52 attacks were in the Pashtun belt with 797 deaths. There were 15 attacks in the non-Pashtun areas with 427 deaths. Muslims killing Muslims and Pashtuns killing Pashtuns has become the defining characteristic of the Pashtun Taliban. As against this, the Punjabi Taliban has concentrated its attacks in Pakistani territory on non-Deobandi and non-Wahabi Muslims consisting of the Shias, the Barelvis and the Ahmadiyas. The expression Punjabi Taliban is applied in Pakistan to the LEJ, the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET), the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HUJI), the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HUM) and the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JEM). Of these, the LET, which is the closest to the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), did not indulge in any act of terrorism in Pakistani territory. Its main focus was on India and Afghanistan.

Of the 1224 fatalities till December 23,2010, 1055 were civilians as against 863 out of 1217 in 2009 and 169 belonged to the security forces. Of those from the security forces killed,62 belonged to the police, 48 to the armed forces, 26 to the Frontier Constabulary, 24 to other para-military units and nine to the ISI. Of the civilians killed, 151 were Shias and 103 were Ahmediyas. Three American nationals were among those killed in 2010. On an average, suicide bombers killed 102 persons per month in 2010, compared with 2009’s average of 101 killings a month.

Earlier on August 5,2010, the “Dawn” of Karachi had carried an analysis of suicide terrorism in Pakistan by Manzar Zaidi, a strategic affairs analyst. His analysis covered all suicide terrorism before and after the Lal Masjid raid. It brought out two facts. Firstly, before the Lal Masjid raid, suicide terrorism in Pakistan was largely a Punjabi phenomenon confined to Sindh and Punjab. There were no acts of suicide terrorism in the Pashtun belt. After the Lal Masjid raid, it has become a largely Pashtun phenomenon with the Pashtun belt being the worst affected. Secondly, there has been an increase in attacks on military-connected targets after the Lal Masjid raid.

The analyses carried by the “News” and the “Dawn” covered only acts of suicide terrorism. They did not cover other acts of terrorism such as the targeted attacks on Shias by the LEJ in Karachi and in the cities of Pakistani Punjab and acts of ethnic terrorism involving the Mohajirs and the the Pashtuns in Karachi. Interestingly, there have been no acts of suicide or suicidal terrorism involving the Afghan Taliban in the non-Pashtun belt. The attacks of the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani group, headed by Jalalludin Haqqani, have been confined to the Kurram Agency in the FATA where there are a large number of Shia Pashtuns, who have become the victims of frequent attacks by the Pakistani as well as the Afghan Taliban as well as by the LEJ.

Neither the intensified operations of the Pakistan Army in the Malakand Division of KP and in South Waziristan, Bajaur and Mohmand agencies of the FATA nor the intensified Drone (unmanned planes carrying missiles) strikes by the US in the FATA have dented the motivation of the Pashtuns—-Pakistani and Afghan— taking to suicide acts of terrorism directed against the civilians and suicidal attacks (fedayeen attacks) against the Pakistani security forces.

The insincere counter-terrorism policies of the Pakistan Army come in the way of the restoration of law and order in the Pashtun belt. The worsening internal security situation and the persistent US criticism of its inaction against the Talibans and Al Qaeda demand that the Pakistan Army act firmly at least against the Pakistani Taliban. But,its interest in recovering its strategic depth in Afghanistan dictate that it avoid firm action against Pashtun terrorism. Its continued use of Punjabi terrorism against India demands that its support to the Punjabi terrorist organizations remain undiminished. The Pashtun terrorists are its strategic assets in Afghanistan. The Punjabi terrorists are its strategic assets against India.

Unless there is an end to these contradictory and insincere policies, the US-led NATO forces are not going to prevail in Afghanistan. Nor is the US going to prevail against Al Qaeda in North Waziristan. Despite two years of intensified Drone strikes, the US is nowhere near victory against either Al Qaeda or the Talibans. Ground operations in Pakistani territory could lead to a disruption of NATO’s logistic supplies to its troops in Afghanistan through Pakistani territory. They are, therefore, unlikely. Deniable covert actions with the help of Pakistani assets well-disposed to the US could be an alternative, but the US has avoided building up a covert action capability which can be tried on the ground.

The fear of Pakistan becoming a failed State prevents the US from acting tough against it. Soft options have failed to nudge Pakistan into acting against the terrorists. Hard options such as the denial of military and economic assistance are avoided lest there be a collapse of the State of Pakistan. The time has come to examine whether the collapse of Pakistan is something to be dreaded. A collapse could lead to a spell of sectarian anarchy, but not necessarily to the triumph of Al Qaeda and the Talibans. The very fact that the international community is prepared to let Pakistan collapse could induce some good sense in the thinking of its army and intelligence establishment. The army thinks that the world cannot afford to let Pakistan collapse. It has to be told that the world is prepared to let it collapse if it does not act against terrorism emanating from its territory effectively.


Enjoy the article?

Did you find this article informative? Please consider contributing to Eurasia Review, as we are truly independent and do not receive financial support from any institution, corporation or organization.


 

B. Raman

B. Raman is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai and Associate, Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: [email protected]

9 thoughts on “Is Letting Pakistan Collapse An Option?

  • December 26, 2010 at 12:14 pm
    Permalink

    Letting Pakistan fall is the very best option. It should have been the absolute strategic goal while the US was on the ascendancy within Afghanistan.

    The common people of Pakistan, on the street, will be much better off in the long run in a non-Islamabad, non-Punjabi run state.

    Give me Balochistan, give me Afghanistan, give me Sindh….it is time the Punjabi be straight on in the heart.

    Reply
  • December 26, 2010 at 9:45 pm
    Permalink

    What is the British position on this “Pakistani failed state” scenario?

    Reply
  • Pingback: Is Letting Pakistan Collapse An Option?

  • December 27, 2010 at 6:18 am
    Permalink

    Pakistan isn’t even a proper state to begin with. It’s just an aberration caused by confused “holier-than-thou” Islamist ideology that has become more rabid and confused with time. Religion never held a country together, least of all Pakistan which was broken in 2 within 25 years of it’s creation. Another division will be good for world peace, not against it.

    Reply
  • December 28, 2010 at 2:05 pm
    Permalink

    Its literally feels like a joke when you read the name at the bottom of this article and know that its coming from an Indian.

    Its widely known that the Pakistan military and secret services have a huge amount of evidence that India is involved in the insurgency movements in Balochistan and Paktoonkhuwa (NWFP), but this Dubai-made-deal-hence-come-democracy regime lead by an ever so apologetic president such as Zardari (who gives clarifications of Indian jet planes entering Pakistani borders) don’t make those evidences public for obvious reasons. Just recently we heard Shahzain Bugti admitting on TV that he’s calling the US embassy after he gets called for terrorist activities. (Makes me wonder quite a lot about why India has so many consulates in Afghanistan after 9/11)

    Its even more pathetic that this is coming from a man from India which is dealing with 30+ separatist movements, with a huge red-zone dominated by Naxalites and others, whose very own Congress’ general secretary admitting that the Hindu extremism and terrorism is a much bigger threat than anything else. So it seems that the author seems to be testifying to the whole world here, that Indians like him, are in fact still fancying a breakup of Pakistan! And this by the way, is a hostile behavior by any standards.

    So although the Indians tried a lot to get President Obama to say something harsh against Pakistan while he was visiting Delhi, all they managed to do is to hear some praising remarks about the efforts in this so-called “War on Terror”, now they come up with such articles ignoring all of their internal problems and weaknesses.

    The bottom line for Pakistani people is to get their country back from these foreign sponsored puppets posing as their leaders (which is part of this 4th generation warfare inflicted upon them) and build a strong distinction between friends and foes.

    Reply
    • January 4, 2011 at 5:40 pm
      Permalink

      Imran,

      It’s not hard to find crazy rants throughout the Internet like your screed. Consider the following:

      1. Pakistan published false Wikileaks cables claiming exactly what you said, “Its widely known that the Pakistan military and secret services have a huge amount of evidence that India is involved in the insurgency movements in Balochistan and Paktoonkhuwa (NWFP).” Of course, it took the Guardian, a Western paper, to debunk this nonsense. But hey, if you keep repeating it, maybe even you might believe it.

      2. “And this by the way, is a hostile behavior by any standards.” Actually, no it isn’t. Hostile behaviour is attacking Danish nationals when someone in their country draws a cartoon, which your country advocates.

      I could go on. Pakistan’s failed states ranking, how it handled the flooding, a virtual economic recession in the country, the killing of the Punjab governor, Christians condemned to death due to blasphemy laws, etc. You’d think that people like you would get the idea after virtually no citizens in the West, the Middle East, Asia, or anywhere else one wanted to donate aid relief to your country. But hey, instead of dealing with Pakistan’s problems, let’s look at India! Or blame the US for your own failings.

      Like most people who aren’t Pakistani, 2015 will hopefully be a great year. It’s the year the CIA predicts your “country” will finally collapse. Looking forward to it!

      Reply
  • December 28, 2010 at 6:45 pm
    Permalink

    Peculiarly, their nukes are left out of the analysis within this article.

    Reply
  • December 29, 2010 at 3:43 am
    Permalink

    Imran / Akram:
    You are absolutely right about every single point you have made. Kudos to you man! To be so young, as is evident in your pic … and to be have such great intimacy with high placed sources across India, the White House and Pakistani Army / ISI … is indeed a great achievement. I am a talent scout who specializes in placing up and coming rising stars of propaganda to work for seriously intellectual publications like The National Inquirer. We need fresh young minds like you to put the world on fire … so please do sign up with me. I can promise you a monthly salary of 1000 Pakistani Rupees, provided you promise to write pro-India articles.

    Imran / Akram: DO NOT PASS UP THIS OFFER.

    Reply
  • March 17, 2011 at 8:41 pm
    Permalink

    Pakistan is destained to collapse. Nothing will stop her from collapsing. It is on her death bed taking last breaths being oxygenated by US AID money,World abndk and IMF Loans. How long you can keep people from diffrent ethenic origin under religious banner. If it was the case the Otman empire would not collpase, which was more stronger. Pakistan’s assets are Taliban and Al-Qaida. The day this game is over, Pakistan will collpse and disapper from world map. The sooner the btter for world peace and stability.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CLOSE
CLOSE