By Karen Parrish
A confluence of circumstances in the Air Force has “birthed a national aircrew crisis,” the service’s manpower chief warned the House Armed Service Committee’s military personnel subcommittee Wednesday.
Several factors contribute to the crisis, Lt. Gen. Gina M. Grosso, Air Force deputy chief of staff for manpower and personnel services told the House panel.
Those factors include 26 years of high operational tempo, commercial industry’s demand for pilots and “cultural issues that affect the quality of life and service for our airmen,” she said.
Grosso testified about aviation shortfalls alongside Marine Corps Deputy Commandant for Manpower and Reserve Affairs Lt. Gen. Mark A. Brilakis, Chief of Naval Personnel Vice Adm. Robert P. Burke and director of Army Aviation Maj. Gen. Erik C. Peterson.
Air Force Short More Than 1,500 Pilots
Grosso cautioned the representatives that the Air Force’s ability to be “always there” isn’t cheap.
“Being ‘always there’ comes at a cost to equipment, infrastructure and most importantly, our airmen,” she said. “And we are now at a decision point: sustained global commitments and recent funding cuts affect capacity and capability for a full-spectrum fight against a near-peer adversary.”
At the end of fiscal year 2016, Grosso said, the Air Force’s active and reserve components were short a total of 1,555 pilots, including 1,211 fighter pilots. The cost to train a fifth-generation fighter pilot, she noted, is around $11 million.
“A 1,200 fighter-pilot shortage amounts to a $12 billion capital loss for the United States Air Force,” she said.
Commercial Firms Offer Stiff Competition
Grosso told the subcommittee an upcoming surge of mandatory retirements for commercial airline pilots and an increasing market for global commerce is causing the civilian aviation industry to begin hiring “at unprecedented rates.”
She acknowledged money is a primary factor in the squeeze on military pilot ranks. Major airlines hired more than 4,100 pilots last year, and the average pay increase for commercial pilots was 17 percent, she said.
“These annual hiring levels are expected to continue for the next 10 to 15 years,” she added.
Grosso said a 2015 exit survey revealed reasons the Air Force is losing talent include “too many duties unrelated to flying, inability to maintain work-life balance, and availability of civilian jobs, in that order.”
‘Holistic Strategy’ Against Pilot Shortage
The Air Force will take a three-pronged approach to the shortage crisis, the general said: reduce requirements, increase production and increase retention.
The service already has cut the number of pilots filling operational planning positions to prioritize manning at flying squadrons, she said, and will expand undergraduate pilot training to the maximum capacity of 1,400 pilots a year.
However, Grosso said, “future increases in throughput will require additional manpower, infrastructure, operations and maintenance resources.”
The Air Force is working to improve retention through a number of “nonmonetary programs” to improve quality of life, ranging from reducing additional duties to outsourcing some routine administrative tasks in operational squadrons, she said.
“All of these efforts give time back to our aviators so they can focus on their primary duty – flying,” Grosso said.
The Air Force also offers an aviation bonus of $35,000, she said. The bonus increase from an 18-year-old cap of $25,000 per year was authorized by last year’s defense authorization act, but it fell short of the service’s request to raise the limit to $48,000.
The service will keep exploring ways to bolster retention, Grosso said.
“The Air Force is committed to a holistic strategy to maintain our pilot inventory as we face external and internal challenges,” she said. “While we aggressively pursue creative means to respond to the demands on our pilots, our attention will be focused on developing an agile set of solutions.”
Enjoy the article?
Did you find this article informative? Please consider contributing to Eurasia Review, as we are truly independent and do not receive financial support from any institution, corporation or organization.