ISSN 2330-717X

The Mekong Delta’s Transboundary Water Problems – Analysis

By

By Thong Anh Tran*

Advertisement

The Mekong River is the lifeblood of countries in the Mekong region, but the past few years have seen water flows recurringly decline and processes of saltwater intrusion accelerating in the Vietnamese Mekong delta. These transboundary hydrological challenges have detrimental effects on millions of people living in the delta, whose livelihoods depend on the Mekong.

Climate change has played a role through the effects of reduced rainfall, rising temperatures, and extreme weather events. But many scholars argue that these transformations cannot solely be attributed to climate change — and that an important part of the explanation lies in the operation of large-scale hydropower dams in the upper stretches of the river.

With a controlling role in the delta, some argue that China holds back a significant amount of water for the sake of its own development, with knock-on implications and costs for downstream users. The Mekong Agreement of 1995 provides China with the statutory authority and mechanisms to retain water for its own ‘reasonable and equitable use’, though this definition is nuanced and complicated, as noted by the Mekong River Commission. Downstream countries, notably Laos, also contribute to the problem by pursuing the construction of a wide array of dams, both in tributaries and the mainstream.

Ongoing debate about the mediating role of Chinese dams in regulating downstream water flows continues. Many express their doubts about the role that the Mekong River Commission plays in monitoring the hydrological regimes across the geographical span of the Mekong River, aside from the well-functioning knowledge hub it provides for the Mekong countries.

The fragmentation of the Mekong due to the construction of large-scale hydropower dams illustrates the inability of downstream states to shape the definition of ‘reasonable and equitable’ use into one focussed on regional aims, rather than centred around national interests.

Advertisement

But there have been some successes. Most notably, the moratorium on the building of two mainstream hydropower projects — Sambor and Stung Treng — by the Cambodian government is a positive sign that downstream countries are recognising and responding to negative transboundary implications. That said, the decision may only be short-term, as it is a national commitment with narrow jurisdictional limits. The complexity of the transboundary water implications cannot be meaningfully tackled through fragmented national actions.

There are concerns as to whether Vietnam is able to address the complexity of the transboundary water challenges faced by agrarian communities in the delta. Hydropower dams in the Central Highlands of Vietnam devastatingly impact downstream areas. This puts Vietnam in an awkward position considering the engagement of Vietnamese companies in the construction of the mainstream hydropower Luang Prabang dam, and other dams in Laos. Whatever the rationale behind this investment in the Luang Prabang project, benefitting from upstream developments in this way undermines any arguments that Vietnam might make about the negative downstream consequences in the delta.

There is much uncertainty about the longer-term changes to the Mekong’s hydrological regime. But a significant out-migration from the delta is already occurring, with the rural poor abandoning the delta in search of employment in urban areas. How national governments will respond to the effects of climate change, however, is unclear. Will Cambodia, for example, decide to reactivate its dam-building plans? If so, processes that are already underway in the delta would accelerate, with significant implications for the delta’s population.

Transboundary hydrological transformations present unprecedented risks to the delta. At the local scale, a mix of control and adaptive measures have been undertaken to deal with externalities. But these local efforts are insufficient as a long-term solution to the emerging challenges. Rather, it demands the strong determination of Vietnam’s government to push forward an agenda that will establish a Mekong-wide dialogue platform to diagnose and resolve the challenges of transboundary water management. Meaningful cooperation towards improving Mekong hydrological conditions must also be facilitated, and benefits shared between upstream and downstream countries.

At the regional scale, it is time for Mekong riparian countries and the Mekong River Commission to look beyond their business-as-usual practices. Instead of solely relying on hydropower projects that have caused detrimental transboundary consequences, alternative energy solutions must be ramped up. There is great potential to invest in solar and wind projects, especially on the coast of Vietnam. But while these energy development pathways are progressing, the lives of millions of Mekong residents still hang on the uncertainty characterised by the sporadic benevolence of upstream countries as well as their strong political will to increasingly squeeze the Mekong flows.

*About the author: Thong Anh Tran is an Honorary Lecturer at the Fenner School of Environment and Society, College of Science, The Australian National University, and a Research Fellow at Fulbright University Vietnam.

Source: This work is published by East Asia Forum and comes under the project ‘Sustainable Governance of Transboundary Environmental Commons in Southeast Asia’, funded by the Social Science Research Council of the Singapore Ministry of Education.

East Asia Forum

East Asia Forum is a platform for analysis and research on politics, economics, business, law, security, international relations and society relevant to public policy, centred on the Asia Pacific region. It consists of an online publication and a quarterly magazine, East Asia Forum Quarterly, which aim to provide clear and original analysis from the leading minds in the region and beyond.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.