Trump’s Campaign Dangerously Flubs Response To Latest Clinton Trap Re Russia – OpEd


Meet the Press host Chuck Todd to Trump campaign manager Paul J. Manafort:

“What was your role in the Republican platform’s call for bombing North Korea?”

Manafort to Todd: “I had none.”

What’s the takeaway from this hypothetical conversation? Manafort validated Todd’s assertion that there is a plan for bombing, while claiming to have had no part in it. But the facts show there never was any such plan in the first place. Todd asked a trick question, and Manafort fell for it.

That pseudo-conversation illustrates what just happened in real life.

The subject is not North Korea, but Ukraine and the recent Clinton allegations that Trump is in cahoots with Vladimir Putin.

Huffington Post ran the headline, “Trump Pushed for GOP to Change Ukraine Position.” This supports the ongoing Clinton suggestion that Trump is tainted by his alleged connections with Vladimir Putin. HuffPost went on to say, “The pro-Russia change was the only party platform tweak the Trump camp cared about, sources say.”

By the way, I told Huffington Post that I could find no primary source for the issues their story raises, and asked if they have one. There was no immediate response.

Now to the true-life interaction between Manafort and Todd: Sunday morning, July 31, Manafort appeared with Todd on Meet the Press. Todd brought up the platform issue of sending lethal weaponry to Ukraine.

He asked, “How much influence did you have on changing that language?”

Manafort answered, “I had none.”

Bingo. That’s the same trick from the North Korea analogy. It’s almost like the old “when did you stop beating your wife?” joke question. Todd set up a false premise and cast an aspersion of Manafort’s complicity.

But, instead of denying the legitimacy of the premise, Manafort’s first response was to deny his culpability. In doing so, he validated the false premise.

Manafort added, “In fact I didn’t even hear about it until after our convention was over.” Again, another validation of the false premise.

What Manafort should have told Todd right off the bat is: “There was no such change in the platform.”

This Meet the Press exchange is covered in an August 1 TMP story titled “Changed GOP Platform on Ukraine.” While this article piles-on Manafort over Todd’s allegations, it also, perhaps unwittingly, sabotage’s the Todd-TMP premise of a platform change.

TMP references a July 18 Washington Post article by Josh Rogin as its source, and summarizes:

“When a platform committee member offered an amendment to the platform that called for supporting Ukraine, members of the Trump campaign who were not members of the committee jumped in to edit the amendment, Rogin reported. They stripped language from the amendment saying the U.S. should help Ukraine by “providing lethal defensive weapons” and instead wrote that America should offer “appropriate assistance.”

Do you see the flaw in the Todd-TMP argument? An amendment was offered to inject a call for sending lethal weaponry. Trump didn’t have the platform changed. It didn’t call for lethal weapons in the first place. Someone else tried and failed to make a change.

What’s more, it seems like the Trump camp worked to strike up a compromise instead of outright defeating the proposed amendment.

Based on the TMP report it sounds like the amendment would politically mandate sending deadly weapons. The compromise amendment calls for offering “appropriate assistance.” Logically if sending lethal weaponry should show itself as appropriate, it would be permissible.

The original proposal was to send the weapons whether they were appropriate or not at any given time. What a dangerous condition that would have created. Thank goodness a compromise was worked out.

Manafort is a sharp, experienced guy. But he’s sure blowing it when it comes to the Russia issue.

Actually Manafort is Paul J. Manafort, Jr. He grew up in the city where I live. I knew his late father. He was a popular former mayor. We have a street named after him, “Paul Manafort Drive.” I can remember sitting with the senior Manafort one presidential election night years ago in front of a TV. “PJ” had tipped him off to the time when he would be speaking on a national broadcast network. Paul Sr. was proudly awaiting the appearance of PJ.

I think it’s sad to see that PJ is unsuccessfully handling the challenges the Clinton campaign are throwing him over Russia. Perhaps Manafort has poor staff support in this area.

Nonetheless we still see the specious Clinton allegations, Todd’s successful attempt to put Manafort in a compromised position, and also TMP’s me-too article. Lies, lies, lies, everwhere lies.

The Trump team seems to be the only truthful player here. Yet Trump is getting his clock cleaned over Russia.

This Clinton gamesmanship continues to push the US-Russia relationship dangerously toward the brink. I think the most effective way to halt that nonsense is to turn the issue back around on Clinton. That should be done. It can be done. But no one’s doing it. Alas.

William Dunkerley

William Dunkerley is a media business analyst, international development and change strategist, and author of numerous books, monographs, and articles. He has been editor and publisher of media industry information, and has additional expertise in post-communist media business and content.

2 thoughts on “Trump’s Campaign Dangerously Flubs Response To Latest Clinton Trap Re Russia – OpEd

  • August 2, 2016 at 10:47 am

    Don’t worry. Clinton’s brinkmanship trying to vilify Trump at every moment and based on every word he says, will backfire very soon. Not only are people tired of her having no genuine arguments against Trump and vilifying him on trifles and based on invented facts, but they increasingly hate her moralism. Just as most heads of state disliked her because she was a moralist and they didn’t like that. It came flying back at Obama’s head time and again: “we won’t tolerate such behavior by the USA” as Clinton accused them that the US won’t tolerate such behavior from them. It will be the same with the vilification. If Trump’s comments are analyzed, he is in fact right and puts the finger exactly on Hillary’s racism and indifference towards women – the points she counts on most.

    The media and the public at large won’t see the finesse in Trump’s comments. But in time it will come to them. Then it will turn the scale against Hillary the same way that Trump’s short comments on Ted Cruz and that there aren’t a lot of evangelicals coming from Cuba, ultimately sank Cruz.

    As to Trump being in cahoots with Putin, that is just simply preposterous. There is a much more important reason to prevent shipping lethal weapons to Ukraine: to prevent the war in Ukraine from escalating into Russia and leading to a direct confrontation with Russia in Europe. No only would that be the start of WW3 and nuclear war going down over the US homeland as well, but it would in fact end pretty much any world trade and economy. Trump wants trade instead of war. Hence war has to be prevented by not sending lethal weapons unless there is a more stringent reason. Hillary wants war and still believes that the US can win a nuclear war. When the US lies in ruins Hillary will then “have evaluated” and admit it was “a mistake”. Trump wants to prevent such atrocity. Thank Trump for being rational.

  • August 2, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    Mr. Trumps knows better than Secretary Clinton and the Obama administration. Mr. Trump is not a war criminal. Mr. Trump has not killed thousands of Muslims by Drones. Mr. Trumps has not invaded Iraq and killed 1.5 million Iraqis. Mr. Trump has not destroyed Mosques and hospitals and universities. Mr. Trump has not destroyed roads and bridges. Mr. Trump has not killed any person in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan. Mr. Trump has not sent classified emails to any person. Whoever has disclosed the email information is a hero because he or she has provided the public with very useful information about corruption committed by Secretary Clinton. President Putin and Islam and Muslims have been used by the Democrats for Secretary Clinton to become the President. They are making humanities chocolate bars to use to satisfy their political desire and goal. All Democrats are doing injustice to Mr. Trump. Secretary Hillary Clinton and President Obama have killed millions of Muslims and most of them are innocent people. Any Muslim defends Secretary Clinton and President Obama is ignoring and justifying war crimes against humanity and Muslim people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Egypt, Turkey, Tunis, Algeria, Palestine, and other people in France and Belgium. Finally, Mr. Trump has said all the true information about Secretary Clinton. For your information, even President Clinton had committed war crimes against Iraq, Serbia, Sudan, and other countries and now he is using Islam and Muslim to go back to the White House again.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *