ISSN 2330-717X

Colombia: Peace Talks With Terrorists: Declarations Of Santos – Analysis

By

By Darya Vakulenko

On September 4, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos unveiled more details about the peace talks being scheduled with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC. It was the president’s second speech regarding the peace developments within the last two weeks; the first taking place on August 27 when the start of “exploratory talks” with FARC was declared. This renewed peace process represents a monumental shift in the attitude of the Colombian government towards the notorious terrorist group and gives hope to force the end the guerrilla conflict.

Juan Manuel Santos
Juan Manuel Santos

The FARC has been terrorizing, assassinating and kidnapping, keeping many Colombians and foreign visitors in fear. In order to maintain its decade-long open conflict with the government forces, the guerrilla group has been financing its activities with coca production and distribution. By the best estimates, the number of casualties caused by FARC from 1975 to 2011 is approximately 14,645 people. Additionally, former President Uribe, from 2002 to 2010 presided over the worst two years of casualties.[1] The growth of violence during Uribe’s term is largely attributed to his exclusive use of military force in attempts to exterminate the guerrilla groups, while blocking any negotiations.

On August 27, Colombia’s current president, Santos, declared in a televised address that although negotiations will take place, “operations and military presence will be maintained on every centimeter of national territory.”[2] President Santos also stated that, “the process has to lead to an end to the conflict, not to its prolongation” and “learning of the past mistakes” must be key objectives in these negotiations. Such “past mistakes” included former President Pastrana’s ill-fated peace talks in 1999, in which he granted to FARC an area in southern Colombian as large as Denmark.[2]

By the time President Pastrana took office in August1998, he already had held talks with FARC leader Manuel Marulanda Velez or “Tirofijo”. The peace process continued throughout his presidency, as he had four years until the next elections to achieve success in negotiating with FARC–through which he hoped to attract electoral support. However those peace negotiations failed, contributing in part to Pastrana’s loss to Uribe and his assurance that no future negotiations with FARC would likely to take place.

During the following eight years of Uribe’s presidency a strong military response to FARC’s violent actions prevailed. In October 2006, Uribe declared, after a car attack staged by FARC close to the Military Academy hadleft 23 people injured, that all peace negotiations with FARC would be ceased while under his rule.[3]President Uribe’s tactics were similar to then-current Mexican President Calderon’s fight against drug cartels in that he increased the military presence with significant financial and material support from the United States, expecting success through force alone. Nonetheless, important policy change can be seen in Peña Nieto’s victory in Mexico, an oppositional presidential candidate from the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, with his primary electoral goal of lowering the level of violence, rather than hunting down the leaders of the drug cartels. Now we see Juan Manuel Santos shifting its tactics towards peace talks, rather than increasing his reliance on an enhanced military presence, a strategy he would have followed when he was Colombia’s defense minister.

The President’s most recent speech, delivered on September 4 in Bogota, describes three phases of negotiations. The first phase, which has been finished successfully, set out the “rules of the game” through the preliminary meetings. The second phase will take place in Oslo and Havana starting October and will include direct sessions and wide open dialogue between the government and FARC. The last one is the implementation of the agreement itself.[4] This declaration has shed light on what is usually a secretive process, a sign that Santos’ plan might be different from some of his predecessors, who tried to bring peace to Colombia through negotiations with terrorists.

Despite the validity of Santos’ ideas, he must race against the ticking election clock. After his Monday declaration, the results of the peace negotiations will become a defining issue for the upcoming elections in 2014. He has two more years to secure a positive settlement; less time than Pastrana had in 1999. President Santos decision to reconcile with FARC is motivated by various issues such as the will to differentiate himself from Uribe’s “no negotiation” position, the attraction of new voters, the economic hardships of funding a large army to fight guerilla forces, and most importantly, a shift within Colombian society towards search for democratic solutions rather than violence. Moreover, in a country torn by a decades-long troubled coexistence with the guerrillas’ violent practices, news of a possible peace agreement has received positive feedback from various organizations like Colombians for Peace as well as from the public.[5]

As LatinNews reported on August 28, talks between the Colombian government and FARC will take place in Oslo, Norway on October 5 with later negotiations to be held in Cuba.[6]Santos’ strong desire to end the conflict via peaceful means demonstrates a departure from previous policy in relations with guerrilla groups, and the popular support that has since been forthcoming suggests that it is an appropriate time for such negotiations to commence. The next two years will reveal the costs and risks Santos and his government are willing to run.

Darya Vakulenko, Research Associate at Council on Hemispheric Affairs

[1] UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia. Uppsala Universitet. Colombia http://www.ucdp.uu.se/gpdatabase/gpcountry.php?id=35&regionSelect=5-Southern_Americas#

[2] Declaración del Presidente de la República, Juan Manuel Santos. Presidencia, Republica de Colombia official web site. http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Prensa/2012/Agosto/Paginas/20120827_01.aspx

[3] “Se colmo la copa”. La semana. October 21, 2006. http://www.semana.com/nacion/colmo-copa/97693-3.aspx

[4] Pena, Andrea. Santos sobre el proceso de paz: “Las operaciones militares van a continuar”. El Pais. September 4, 2012. http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2012/09/04/actualidad/1346773826_901525.html

[5] “Colombianos por la Paz pide que EE. UU. respalde contactos con Farc”. El Tiempo. September 5, 2012. http://www.eltiempo.com/politica/colombianos-por-la-paz-pide-que-ee-uu-respalde-contactos-con-farc_12171502-4

[6] “Santos un-pockets the keys to peace”. LatinNews Daily Report. 28 August 2012 http://www.latinnews.com/component/k2/item/52910.html?period=August+2012&archive=3&cat_id=789219%3Asantos-un-pockets-the-keys-to-peace&Itemid=6

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

COHA

COHA, or Council on Hemispheric Affairs, was founded in 1975, the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA), a nonprofit, tax-exempt independent research and information organization, was established to promote the common interests of the hemisphere, raise the visibility of regional affairs and increase the importance of the inter-American relationship, as well as encourage the formulation of rational and constructive U.S. policies towards Latin America.

One thought on “Colombia: Peace Talks With Terrorists: Declarations Of Santos – Analysis

  • September 6, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    Permalink

    It’s very easy to call the FARC ‘terrorists’, while forgetting the atrocities committed by the government, which included betraying a previous peace deal by exterminating a whole, legal political party, or the association of Uribe’s family and close collaborators with drug dealing and the Paramilitaries. Or forgetting that many of the FARC soldiers are displaced peasants, evicted from their land by wealthy land owners, while authorities did nothing to protect them, or aided their eviction. One of the reasons Latin America has turned against U.S policy in the region is such monodimensional, simplistic views, as expressed in the article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.