Give Me Missiles: Gina Rinehart And The Pathologies Of Mining – OpEd

By

Power should only ever be vested carefully, and certainly not in the hands of mining magnate Gina Rinehart, a creature so comically absurd as to warrant immediate dismissal in any respectable commentary.  But Australia’s richest human being demands to be noticed, given the insensible influence she continues to exert in press and policy circles.  Rants of smelly suggestion become pearls of perfumed wisdom, often occasioned by large amounts of largesse she disgorges on her sycophantic following.  

Of late, she has been busy in her narcissistic daftness.  At the National Bush Summit held last month, she proved particularly unstoppable.  While advertised as a News Corp project backed by a number of Australian corporate heavies (NBN, CommBank, Woolworths and Qantas), Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting left its unmistakable mark.  The events offered a Rinehart Hall of Mirrors, self-reflecting her purchased eminence.  She funded much of it; she structured it; she brought the necessary tyrannical boredom in tow.

Before remarking on some of the observations, brief mention should be made about the source of Rinehart’s animal spirit.  One should never condemn, outright, the children for the sins of their parents.  But she is the exception that proves the rule.  Her father, Lang Hancock, was an elemental Australian version of a 20th century conquistador, an enterprising plunderer of the land and equally immune to cultural refinements and such novel notions as human rights.  With barbaric clarity and genocidal suggestion, he proposed in 1984 that unassimilated members of the Indigenous populace be given the following treatment: “dope up the water up, so that they were sterile and would breed themselves out in the future and that would solve the problem.”  

At the Port Hedland leg of the Bush Summit, Rinehart fantasised about having the military styled comforts offered by the US firm Rafael Advanced Defense Systems in 2011 to Israel.  The Iron Dome system, used to shield Israel from rocket attacks, could just as well be deployed in Australia.  But instead of focusing on protecting civilians, the batteries would be invaluable in protecting Rinehart’s own mining assets in the Pilbara.   

A gorged ego, the country’s perceived welfare and mining interests are all fused in an unsteady mix of justified plunder under the cover of military protection for Hancock Prospecting.  “It is no good having the resources of the Pilbara unless we can ship it out.  Hence, we should have defence to keep our railways and ports open, and defend our sea lanes.”  To the defensive dome could also be added “war drones, and smart sea mines.”    

The next target in this spray of barking madness was government regulation – at least the sort that impairs her extractive practices.  With brattish petulance, she even claimed that Canada had treated the mining industry with greater aplomb and respect, despite having, in her words, a “socialist” Prime Minister in the form of Justin Trudeau.  Various taxes, such as the Fringe Benefits Tax, should be ditched, given the damage it was doing to Northern Australia.  

Others in the primary industry market such as farmers and pastoralists also deserved relief from the stifling burden of red tape. “The size, expense, and intrusion of government has all grown massively in recent times, adding to businesses costs, record business failures, rising house costs and our own living costs, and delaying revenue earning projects.”   Some of these observations are far from untrue, but coming from Rinehart, they suggest a grotesque self-interest at work.

In Bendigo, Victoria, her video address fumed at the state of Australia’s “woke” education system.  Australia’s children and grandchildren, some “as young as three in pre-schools” were “being let down” by insidious practices, including lessons on the evils of the police and plastics.  “They and others in school classes are no longer taught to be proud of our country, quite the opposite.”  

Such vulnerable creatures, made to feel anxious about the effects of climate change, were also being deprived of a true understanding of mining, coal and iron ore.  “In the entire high school curriculum iron ore is referenced only twice,” she sulks.  “Yet climate change and renewable energy are mentioned 48 times.”

All liberal democracies face similar challenges:  how to make sure the thick of mind remain distracted and resistant to riot, and keeping the malevolently wealthy contained within the realm of accountability.  Rinehart’s commentaries suggest a desire to escape that orbit of accountability, operating as an unelected politician’s wish list.  And being unelected is exactly how she likes it.  The compromise and messiness of parliamentary debate and the making of policy would prove too excruciating and intolerable.  Far better to intimidate elected representatives from afar, using platoons of paid-up lobbyists, consultants and cheering propagandists.  When feeling generous, give them a confessional platform to ask forgiveness for their sins.

Were the fossil fuel lobby to be equipped with actual weapons, a coup would not be off the cards.  A few Australian prime ministers have already had their heads, politically speaking, served on a platter to the mining industry, with Rinehart’s blessings.  A depressing conclusion can thereby be drawn.  Australia is a country where rule is exercised by those outside parliament.  It’s Rinehart on minerals and metals and the Pentagon and the US military complex on weapons and military bases.  What a stupendous state of affairs Australians find themselves in.

Binoy Kampmark

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: [email protected]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *