Keep An Eye On China’s Ingress In US Backyard – Analysis


By Harsh V. Pant and Kalpit A Mankikar

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Beijing last month to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping and the mandarins at the helm of diplomatic affairs in a bid to stabilise the US-China relationship. During the talks, Blinken’s counterpart, Qin Gang, conveyed a sense of alarm, cautioning that relations were at its nadir since the establishment of diplomatic ties more than four decades ago.

The wheels of engagement began to turn after US President Joe Biden and Xi met in Indonesia during the G20 summit in November 2022, when an understanding was reached about keeping open the channels of communication. The May 2023 G7 summit saw Biden raising the prospect of a thaw in relations, and signalled a shift in the approach from “decoupling” to “derisking and diversifying”.

The drivers of this recalibration were a dissonance in the ranks as evidenced from European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen’s assertion that decoupling from China was unviable and not in Europe’s interest. For Xi, the prospect of a rapprochement held out the possibility of a visit to the US on account of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in November 2023.

On the outcome of the visit, the devil looms in the details. Biden publicly patted Blinken on the back and said US-China relations were on the right track. But veteran Chinese scholars such as Wu Xinbo, director at Fudan University’s Center for American Studies, did not see any silver linings. US treasury secretary Janet Yellen is scheduled to visit Beijing in July, even as Washington’s economic bureaucracy is in the process of rolling out financial restrictions that may constrict the flow of American capital into China. This may further cement the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) notion of US suppression of its rise.

The issue of Taiwan is not out of the woods yet and will continue to be the bone of great power contention. Taiwan figured prominently during Blinken’s talks with Wang Yi, who helms CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Office. Wang underlined that national unity was the “core of core interest and that it was also the CPC’s national mission”. He also underscored that the US must oppose Taiwan’s independence. Blinken emphasised the importance of maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, affirming that there was no change in the American position.

The Taiwan Relations Act mandates the US government to come to the defence of the island, and resist attempts by Beijing to change the status quo. Among the six assurances given to Taiwan are that the US would not ask the island to negotiate with China about its future, and that there would be no cut-off date for ending the sale of arms. Thus, we must evaluate these objections by China in light of Xi’s threats that “(On Taiwan) China will not renounce the use of force.” Other questions that have the potential to upset the putative China-US thaw are linked to whether incumbent vice-president Lai Ching-te, who earlier took a strong position on Taiwan’s independence, wins re-election.

There are other landmines in America’s backyard, in the form of China’s tightening embrace of Cuba. On the back of reports highlighting the construction of facilities in Cuba that enable Beijing to collect electronic intelligence, it has now emerged that Chinese telecom majors such as Huawei are bolstering snooping facilities.

More damaging for the US is China’s design to build an installation to house People’s Liberation Army personnel on America’s door. While the Biden administration has reportedly opened lines of communications with the Cubans, hoping to get the deal nixed, the issue of China’s expanding footprint in America’s backyard has the potential of snowballing into an important issue ahead of the US presidential election. Meanwhile, neighbouring Honduras was rewarded with a sweetheart trade deal by Beijing for switching diplomatic allegiances a few months ago. If other dominoes continue to fall in America’s backyard, it can certainly feed into the US political debate on America’s decline.

New Delhi’s response to Chinese belligerence has been to partner with the US, Australia and Japan. But given that India is alone in this quartet to share a land border with China, how America counters Chinese ingress in its backyard will be an important touchpoint in crafting its future approach.

About the authors:

  • Professor Harsh V. Pant is Vice President – Studies and Foreign Policy at Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. He is a Professor of International Relations with King’s India Institute at King’s College London. He is also Director (Honorary) of Delhi School of Transnational Affairs at Delhi University.
  • Kalpit A Mankikar is a Fellow with Strategic Studies programme, and is based out of ORF’s Delhi centre. His research focusses on China, specifically looking at its rise and domestic politics.

Source: This article was published by The Observer Research Foundation and originally appeared in Hindustan Times.

Observer Research Foundation

ORF was established on 5 September 1990 as a private, not for profit, ’think tank’ to influence public policy formulation. The Foundation brought together, for the first time, leading Indian economists and policymakers to present An Agenda for Economic Reforms in India. The idea was to help develop a consensus in favour of economic reforms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *