ISSN 2330-717X

Why Are Anti-Environmentalists Still Pushing For The Lake Powell Pipeline? – OpEd

By

The folks who are opposed to actions to slow global warming act like believing in global warming is optional, in the same way that we might think that enjoying baseball is optional. Of course, people can believe whatever they want, but the fact is that the planet is getting warmer, and we stand to get screwed in a thousand different ways if we don’t take steps to stop it.

Advertisement

And, nothing changes in this story by people opting not to believe in global warming. Their beliefs are not going to help the billions of people who will suffer the consequences in the decades ahead, just like it doesn’t help a shooting victim if the guy pulling the trigger doesn’t believe that bullets hurt people.

A great example of nonsense antienvironmental beliefs affecting action is the effort to construct the Lake Powell Pipeline (LPP). This is a pipeline that would transport 83,800 acre-feet of water a year from Lake Powell to Washington County, Utah. Washington County has a rapidly growing population, and the argument is that it will need water from Lake Powell to serve its needs.

Apart from the question of whether the pipeline is really needed, there is also the problem that Lake Powell doesn’t have the water. Even without the pipeline draining more than 80,000 acre-feet of water a year, the lake is already approaching the critical level at which point the Glen Canyon dam will no longer be able to supply power to 5 million people in the Southwest.

While the lake’s level is already below the danger point, where it no longer has the targeted margin, it would have been even closer if we had LPP operating for the last fifteen years. We would already be below the critical level of 3490 feet if the LPP had been operating for the last 30 years.

Source: Bureau of Reclamation and author’s calculations.

Incredibly, our antienvironmentalists are still pushing for the pipeline spending, millions of dollars on planning and studies. It’s hard to imagine a worse use of money, except for actually building the pipeline.

Advertisement

The reality is that because of global warming, we are seeing much less rain and snowfall in the area than in prior decades. There is no reason to think this picture will get better in the years ahead. That means we will have problems maintaining energy production from the dam even without the LPP. If we were to build the LPP, we would very quickly need another energy source for 5 million people in the area.

But, the antienvironmentalists are like little kids. They have to be humored with the idea that we could build the LPP, even though it makes no sense. So, we will spend millions more doing pointless analyses of the LPP’s costs and benefits, even when its obvious that costs swamp the benefits, since the water simply is not there.

It is expensive to have a large segment of the population living in Never-Never Land.

This first appeared on Dean Baker’s Beat the Press blog. 

Dean Baker

Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of Plunder and Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy.

One thought on “Why Are Anti-Environmentalists Still Pushing For The Lake Powell Pipeline? – OpEd

  • April 11, 2022 at 2:17 am
    Permalink

    We have a similar situation in California. Twenty-two rivers flowing out of twenty counties form the Sacramento/San Joaquin River system that drains into San Francisco Bay. Humans are already taking 2/3rds of that water for human use and leaving 1/3rd for the fish. It isn’t enough. The humans want more. Every year it’s a huge battle to get any water for the fish that the farmers want. They want more water and every year it’s a battle. The pitiful truth of the matter is that if the humans took 100% of that water and left none for the fish it still wouldn’t be enough. The humans would want more.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.