Global Pandemic Fears Rise As WHO Treaty Falters

By

Attempts to agree a treaty to manage future pandemics risk losing momentum, health leaders gathered at the World Health Assembly warned, as fears grow over outbreaks of bird flu in the US and mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Crowded cities, global travel and climate change heighten the risk from zoonotic viruses – those transmitted between humans and animals – raising the spectre of another pandemic like COVID-19, or worse.

Scientists are particularly concerned about growing cases of bird flu – known as H5N1 – among US cattle, and an outbreak of mpox – formerly known as monkeypox – raging in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

“We have H5N1 knocking on the door,” said Ayoade Alakija, chair of FIND, a nonprofit in Geneva that promotes the development of diagnostic technology.

“We don’t have time to wait.”

The US Centers for Disease Control has warned of an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo of a strain of mpox – known as clade I mpox – which is significantly more severe than the clade II strain which spread around the world in 2022.

“The increasing number of reported suspected clade I mpox cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo poses a global threat for potential spread,” the agency said last month, adding that there had been more than 20,000 suspected cases and 975 deaths reported in the country since January 2023.

It comes as the 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) ended their annual gathering in Geneva, Switzerland, on Saturday (1 June) without the agreement they had planned to reach on the much-debated Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Agreement.

Negotiations will continue, buoyed by the last-minute success in Geneva of a less-noticed, parallel effort to update the International Health Regulations (IHR), a set of rules aimed at preventing the spread of disease across borders.

However, disease experts at the meeting expressed concern that with pandemic threats looming, both agreements may be too little, too late. Neither will come into force until 2027 at the earliest.

Stockpiles

After failings in the international response to COVID-19 left lower-income countries unable to acquire adequate vaccines, while rich countries stockpiled millions of doses, few dispute that the world needs better ways of managing pandemics.

Negotiations for a treaty were launched in December 2021 while COVID-19 was still rampaging, with 2024 set as the deadline.

By the end of planned negotiations on 24 May, negotiators in Geneva said they had resolved 80 per cent of their initial disagreements. The US called it “an integral part of a wider effort to improve the global health infrastructure”, while all 55 members of the African Union declared they “spoke with one voice” in support of the treaty.

However, “fundamental differences remain in core issues”, US health secretary Xavier Becerra told delegates. Those issues mostly involve what delegates in Geneva called the treaty’s “grand bargain” – pathogen access and benefit sharing.

This calls on countries, including low-income countries where the risk of new diseases is highest, to share pathogen samples and genomic sequencing data to allow scientists to track pathogens and design vaccines, drugs and diagnostics against them. In return the mostly high-income countries that produce these countermeasures pledge to share them with low-income countries, along with the know-how to manufacture them.

The treaty also calls for a global supply chain and logistics network to see that vital supplies, such as vaccines, vials and syringes, are shipped to where they are needed.

However, high-income countries are reluctant to give products away, especially know-how protected by intellectual property rights. In the talks, Thiru Balasubramaniam of Knowledge Ecology International accused leaders of giving “primacy to industrial and trade goals at the expense of health”.

As midnight approached in Geneva on 1 June, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told exhausted delegates the treaty negotiations would continue until the 2025 assembly “at the latest” – a compromise between African countries that wanted a December deadline, and the US, which warned the complex issues could take two years to settle.

But some fear momentum may be waning.

“When we decided to draft this accord, we all wore masks,” Precious Matsoso of South Africa, co-chair of the negotiations, said in Geneva. Now, with the emergency over, “the window of opportunity is closing,” she warned.

If talks drag on, she fears, “it will almost be like COVID never happened”.

Negotiators are encouraged, however, by the last-minute agreement in Geneva of revisions to the IHR, which require countries to detect, report and respond to outbreaks that can affect trade and travel, not just potential pandemics.

Pandemic emergency

In 2005 the framework was updated to define the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the strongest warning the WHO can give for an outbreak – which it did for COVID-19 in January 2020.

But after squabbles over the 2009 swine flu outbreak, WHO abandoned the word “pandemic”. Without it, many countries did not take warnings about COVID-19 seriously until WHO finally did call it a pandemic in March 2020 – too late for many to respond effectively.You might also like

Now the IHR will define a “pandemic emergency”, a “PHEIC-plus” for diseases that might go global.

The revisions, reached at the last minute of talks which some nights ran until 4 am, also create networks of countries to address the need for greater investment in disease surveillance and response capacity in low-income countries.

The biggest problem with treaties, however, is enforcement, says Mark Eccleston-Turner, senior lecturer in global health law at King’s College London.

He says there is little in the revised IHR, or the draft pandemic treaty, that would prevent countries ignoring the rules when it suited them, which is exactly what happened during COVID-19, starting with China’s slowness to alert the world.

An extremist campaign on social media claimed the IHR and pandemic treaty were bids by WHO to grab countries’ sovereignty, claims repeated on a bus that circulated in Geneva throughout the meeting and shouted by demonstrators outside UN buildings.

National delegates repeatedly told the meeting that no health measures would infringe their sovereignty, while Tedros took to social media to call the claims fake news.

The updated IHR states that the WHO will verify reports of a disease outbreak by offering to help the country involved investigate.

If the country refuses access, as China did early in 2020, WHO “should” tell other countries about it. An alternative wording, that WHO “shall” do this, was rejected as too extreme.

This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Global desk.

Debora MacKenzie

Debora MacKenzie is a Canadian science journalist who lives in Europe and has worked since the 1980s, for New Scientist magazine and a wide range of newspapers and magazines. In 2020 she wrote the first book to appear on the science surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, published by Hachette US, followed in 2021 by a second, expanded edition, called Stopping the Next Pandemic: how COVID-19 can help us save humanity. She trained as a biomedical researcher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *