EU Countries Split Over Serbian Bid


By Marija Ristic

Ahead of a meeting of EU foreign ministers, member countries remain divided over whether to offer Serbia a start date for membership talks this year or next.

Senior officials in Brussels officials say that a split has emerged among EU member states on Serbian membership negotiations ahead of Tuesday’s meeting of foreign ministers.


“Italy, Austria, Greece and Cyprus favour rewarding Serbia with a conditional start to negotiations at this meeting, which would be put into action at the beginning of the year, as was done with Montenegro,” the source told Balkan Insight.

“But Germany, Britain and The Netherlands believe that while Serbia and Kosovo have made progress in negotiations, their agreements are yet to be implemented, and their stance is that the [European] Council should discuss Serbia’s membership talks in March,” the same source added.

Montenegro obtained a so-called conditional date for start to EU negotiations in December 2011, obliging it to meet specific criteria in order to open negotiations in June 2012.

Serbia obtained EU candidate status in March and is hoping to get the start date for accession talks by the end of this year.

Normalization of relations with Pristina is the key precondition for Serbia’s further progress on the EU path.

On Tuesday the EU ministers will prepare for the European Council meeting on December 13-14 and discuss draft conclusions to be submitted to EU heads of state or government.

Balkan Insight

The Balkan Insight (formerly the Balkin Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN) is a close group of editors and trainers that enables journalists in the region to produce in-depth analytical and investigative journalism on complex political, economic and social themes. BIRN emerged from the Balkan programme of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting, IWPR, in 2005. The original IWPR Balkans team was mandated to localise that programme and make it sustainable, in light of changing realities in the region and the maturity of the IWPR intervention. Since then, its work in publishing, media training and public debate activities has become synonymous with quality, reliability and impartiality. A fully-independent and local network, it is now developing as an efficient and self-sustainable regional institution to enhance the capacity for journalism that pushes for public debate on European-oriented political and economic reform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *