The Iranian Quagmire: Toward A New ‘Vietnam Syndrome’ For The United States – Analysis

The military conflict initiated by the U.S. and Israel on February 28 continues to escalate into a large-scale crisis. Despite the tactical calculations and plans devised by CENTCOM and other allied agencies, the interests of the coalition forces have not been secured. Instead, the conflict has breached Iranian borders, engulfing the Middle East, the Arabian Peninsula, and all Gulf-dependent nations. The crisis is deepening, and the United States is increasingly sinking into a quagmire of Iran’s making.

As I detailed in my previous analysis before the transition to active warfare, I warned that the U.S. would face severe obstacles in this conflict. This escalating tension and the resulting “quagmire” are poised to inflict significant damage on both the Trump administration and the American state. Consequently, the U.S. finds itself in an undesirable position – specifically, facing the looming specter of a modern-day “Vietnam”.

After more than 12 days of combat, the theater of war has expanded significantly. The initial U.S.-Israeli strategy relied on the assumption that precision airstrikes in the early days would neutralize Iran’s potential for resistance. Furthermore, it was anticipated that the elimination of Supreme Leader Khamenei on the first day would collapse the Iranian will to fight. However, subsequent events and Iran’s intensive retaliatory strikes have proven these plans futile, failing to achieve the expected results.

On the contrary, the loss of their religious leader has only driven the regime to respond with increased aggression. This time, the targets extended beyond Israel to include all U.S. military bases stationed across the region. Nations such as Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Bahrain have faced severe attacks. Military bases in these countries were heavily struck, with their infrastructure and facilities systematically dismantled or destroyed.

Furthermore, the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for 25% of global oil trade, has been forced to cease operations. Iran’s closure of the strait, the targeting of tankers carrying oil and other goods, and the mining of the sea are intensifying the crisis in the global oil and gas markets, exerting immense pressure on international exchanges and diplomatic relations.

Despite Donald Trump’s assertions that the situation remains stable and his efforts to release strategic petroleum reserves through partner nations to lower fuel costs, these measures fail to address the underlying crisis. At best, such actions offer only temporary price stabilization. Overall, global oil and gas prices continue to surge as demand reaches peak levels, accompanied by rising costs for non-oil commodities. In short, an intervention that the U.S. initially deemed an “easy target” is now manifesting as a severe global crisis.

Another critical issue is the subjection of regional Arab states to heavy missile and drone strikes by Iran. This represents a significant setback for the United States. The failure to protect its host nations or provide them with adequate air defense (AD) resources has severely damaged U.S. credibility among Arab allies and fostered deep uncertainty across other countries hosting U.S. bases.

Furthermore, a sentiment expressed both directly and indirectly by Arab nations is that the U.S. has “betrayed” them in favor of Israel. While existing stockpiles and air defense systems were dispatched to Israel, Gulf nations were left neglected. In the bid to save Israel, other presumed allies were marginalized. Consequently, states such as Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain have suffered extensive destruction, seen their economic potential minimized, and realized the extent of their vulnerability.

Compounding these challenges is the failure to fully account for Iran’s proxy forces, which is triggering a secondary wave of strikes against U.S. and Israeli interests. Rocket attacks by Hezbollah from Lebanon and the guerrilla tactics employed by partisan forces against the Israeli military – resulting in the destruction of hardware and ammunition – have become a renewed source of loss for Israel. When factoring in the anticipated involvement of the Houthis in these operations, Israel’s capacity to withstand a three-pronged assault becomes a matter of serious debate.

Another factor triggering the “Vietnam Syndrome” for the U.S. is Iran’s transition to a total, uninhibited, and comprehensive offensive. Initial calculations assumed that the death of the Supreme Leader would fatally weaken the leadership, prompting local dissenters to rise and topple the regime from within. However, none of these expectations materialized. On the contrary, the elimination of the Supreme Leader and the targeting of strategic assets and high-ranking officials have propelled Iran into an “endless war” posture. 

Currently, Iran is participating in this war with a “nothing-to-lose” psychology, rendering it fearless in this psychological and political climate. This has escalated their offensive intensity to unpredictable levels. Their singular focus on warfare, stripped of any remaining stakes, transforms them into a force more dangerous to the U.S. than Vietnam ever was.

Despite U.S. officials claiming that operations are nearing completion and victory is within reach, reality suggests otherwise. Despite U.S. officials claiming that operations are nearing completion, the reality on the ground reflects a different story. With daily military expenditures now exceeding $1.5 billion, and direct costs for munitions and operations alone surpassing $11 billion in the first week, Washington is facing a significant financial and strategic fiasco. In less than two weeks, the U.S. has suffered over $20 billion in material losses, a decline in regional influence, the destruction of military bases and infrastructure, a lack of concrete military victory, and the failure to overthrow the Iranian regime. This is a significant fiasco and a defeat for Washington. Under these circumstances, it is virtually impossible for the U.S. to halt military operations, indicating that the conflict will persist in the coming days and weeks. Should ground forces be deployed, this duration could extend from several weeks to several months.

In conclusion, the euphoria that gripped the U.S. has proven to be a massive delusion. The ongoing processes in Venezuela, along with the strategic advantages and minor successes gained over smaller nations such as Cuba and Panama, fostered a dangerous sense of complacency within the U.S. leadership. Furthermore, the assumption – rooted in the 12-day conflict against Iran in June 2025 – that Iranian reserves were exhausted and they lacked the capacity to retaliate has led the U.S. into a strategic dead-end.

Having lost its Supreme Leader and suffered heavy blows to all vital structures and infrastructure, Iran has engaged in a full-scale struggle with the psychology of a party that has nothing left to lose. Consequently, it has mounted a resistance and launched counter-attacks that no one anticipated. This serves as a stark reminder that strategic calculations are not always accurate; every unplanned step leads to grave errors and consequences. This war, initiated by the U.S.-Israeli alliance and met with a massive Iranian response, is heading toward a global crisis, and the cost of this conflict will undoubtedly be heavy for many.

About Nurlan Umudov

Nurlan Umudov is an independent political researcher and strategic analyst specializing in national security, geopolitical forecasting, and regional infrastructure, with a particular focus on the South Caucasus, Euro-Atlantic, and Indo-Pacific regions. He holds a Master's degree in National Security and Political Strategy and is recognized for his predictive analyses of global security shifts.

View all posts by Nurlan Umudov →

Get the Eurasia Review newsletter

Selected analysis, news, and opinion delivered by email.

Like what you read?

Please consider supporting Eurasia Review. Thank you for your consideration!

Nurlan Umudov

Nurlan Umudov is an independent political researcher and strategic analyst specializing in national security, geopolitical forecasting, and regional infrastructure, with a particular focus on the South Caucasus, Euro-Atlantic, and Indo-Pacific regions. He holds a Master's degree in National Security and Political Strategy and is recognized for his predictive analyses of global security shifts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *