Patrick Buchanan: Ron Paul The True Believer – OpEd

By

Last May, Ron Paul filed his financial disclosure form, and The Wall Street Journal enlisted financial analyst William Bernstein to scrutinize his investments.

“Paul’s portfolio isn’t merely different,” said an astonished Journal, “it’s shockingly different.”

Twenty-one percent of his $2.4 to $5.5 million was in real estate, 14 percent in cash. He owns no bonds. Only 0.1 percent is invested in stocks, and Paul bought these “short,” betting the price will plunge. Every other nickel is sunk into gold and silver mining companies.

Bernstein “had never seen such an extreme bet on economic catastrophe,” said the Journal.

“This portfolio,” said Bernstein, “is a half step away from a cellar-full of canned goods and 9-millimeter rounds.”

“You can say this for Ron Paul,” conceded the Journal. “In investing as in politics, (Paul) has the courage of his convictions.”

Indeed, he does. Paul’s investments mirror his belief that the empire of debt is coming down and Western governments will never repay — in dollars of the same value — what they have borrowed.

And here we come to the reason Paul ran a strong third in Iowa and a clear second in New Hampshire. He is a conviction politician and, like Barry Goldwater and George McGovern, the candidate of a cause.

Aware it is unlikely he will ever be president, the 76-year-old soldiers on in the belief that this cause will one day triumph in a party where he was, not long ago, seen as an odd duck, but a party where today he speaks for a national constituency.

It is easy to understand why the young are attracted to him. There is a consistency here no other candidate can match.

Republicans may deplore the GOP Great Society of Bush 43. Paul stood almost alone in voting against every Bush measure. By two-to-one, Americans now believe the Iraq War was a mistake. Paul, alone among the candidates, opposed the war.

And because his campaign is about a cause larger than himself, it is a safe bet he will not quit this race until the last caucuses have met and the last primary has been held.

Prediction: Paul will go into the Tampa, Fla., convention with more delegates than any other candidate save the nominee of the party.

There is a gnawing fear in the GOP that Paul will quit the party when the primaries are over and run as a third-party candidate on the Libertarian or some other line in the November election.

Not going to happen. Such a decision would sunder the movement Paul has pulled together, bring about his own and his party’s certain defeat in November, and re-elect Barack Obama.

Paul would become a pariah in his party, while his son, Sen. Rand Paul, who would be forced to endorse his father over the GOP nominee, would be ruined as a future Republican leader.

Why would Dr. Paul do this, when the future inside the GOP looks bright not only for him but for his son?

The course Ron Paul will likely take, then, is this.

Commit to this nomination battle all the way to Tampa, contest every primary and caucus, amass a maximum of delegates.

If Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich lose in South Carolina, they will lose in Florida, and begin to peel off and drop out, for none is a cause candidate and each will soon come to realize that his presidential aspirations are done for now if not for good.

Their departure will leave the Republican contest a Romney-Paul race, giving Paul half a year on the campaign trail to increase his visibility, enlarge his following, grow his mailing lists and broaden his donor base.

In return for a commitment to campaign for the ticket, Paul should demand a prime-time speaking slot at the convention and use the speech to emulate Barry Goldwater in 1960 when he admonished conservatives at the convention to “grow up,” so that “we can take this party back.”

Assuming the nominee is Mitt Romney, should he win in the fall and Paul has campaigned for him, Paul will not only have a friend in the White House, but be a respected figure in the party with a constituency all his own.

Most important to Paul are the issues he has campaigned on: a new transparency and accountability for the Federal Reserve, a downsizing of the American empire, and an end to U.S. interventions in foreign quarrels and wars that are none of our business.

Whether Paul goes home to Texas when his last term in Congress is over in January 2013, or whether he remains in Washington in a policy institute to advance the causes he believes in, his views will be sought out by the major media on all the issues he cares about.

Moreover, his fears of a coming collapse, manifest in his portfolio, could come to pass, making of Ron Paul a prophet in his own time.

Patrick J Buchanan

Patrick J. Buchanan is an American conservative political commentator, author, syndicated columnist, politician and broadcaster.

6 thoughts on “Patrick Buchanan: Ron Paul The True Believer – OpEd

  • January 13, 2012 at 4:39 pm
    Permalink

    On CNBC today, there were several suggesting yet another run up coming in gold, due to the lack of stability in Europe. Paul predicted all this in great detail in 2002, asking specifically that it be reviewed in 10 years (now).

    Paul’s predictions:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJG_oFFDK0

    Reply
  • January 13, 2012 at 5:55 pm
    Permalink

    It’s high time that Morning Joe, Bill O’Reilly, Brit Hume, Bob Schieffer, David Gergan and the list goes on….start licking Ron Paul’s boots.
    The man is spot on with everything he has said!
    He is our last link to any kind of honest government in this country. It is truly time to “call a spade a spade”.

    Reply
  • January 13, 2012 at 6:25 pm
    Permalink

    Keep spewing the nonsense that Ron Paul will never be president. Then you can EAT HIS BOOTS!

    Ron Paul 2012 – or none at all!!!!

    Go Ron!

    Reply
  • January 14, 2012 at 12:23 am
    Permalink

    Ron Paul is the only candidate who can take Obama’s voters and use them against him and beat him.

    Ron Paul’s machine is much stronger than Obama’s this time around and if nominated, would beat Obama by a landslide.

    It’s too bad the GOP don’t want to admit it that Ron Paul can beat Obama but, of course one has to realize that most of the MSM fall under the Clear Channel Corp which is run by Bain Capital!

    People need to wake up. This is your last chance to save this nation and Romney cannot beat Obama when the GOP has the smallest base in the country.

    Unless Ron Paul gets the nomination, then we will have 2008 repeat. The GOP keeps doing the same thing over and over expecting different results!

    Reply
  • January 14, 2012 at 3:45 am
    Permalink

    I am afraid your making the same hopeful assumption that the rest of the pundits are following. Ron Paul is the leader of a cause or a movement, you are correct. The problem is that while Paul speaks for his Posse, he doesn’t own them. The Kool-Aid he is so successfully selling is the antithesis of Romney and the current GOP platform. Every time he pulls in another convert, it is another GOP vote lost to their leadership.

    Romney may win this nomination, although I have serious doubts, he will not be able to collect enough of Paul’s flock to win the nomination. There are simply too many third party options that are closer to what Paul’s platform is. It will also probably be the end of the 2-party system.

    Reply
  • January 14, 2012 at 12:11 pm
    Permalink

    As far as I see it, Ron Paul has started a brush fire that will continue to grow into a raging inferno. Granted that he is 76 and his time is almost over, I’m sure that those who agree with his views won’t give up the good fight when RP leaves the scene for a much deserved retirement. As Pocho Villa said, “First we take Mexico City, then we find another Madera.” The Liberty movement will do the same. They will find another Ron Paul, and this Nation will be returned to the People. Its only a matter of time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Maggie Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *