ISSN 2330-717X

Fish Feed Greatest Contributor To Greenhouse Gas Emissions In China’s Aquaculture Industry

By

The term aquaculture describes the breeding, rearing and harvesting of organisms such as fish, shellfish and algae in all types of water. It is becoming an increasingly important source of protein for people in many countries and regions.

Advertisement

However, this expansion of aquaculture is accompanied by a corresponding rise in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which are a major contributor to global warming and climate change.

As China is a world leader in aquaculture cultivation, a research group led by the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, conducted a study to discover the GHG emission levels produced by the country’s aquaculture. Their results, published in the KeAi journal Water Biology and Security, show that the production of feed used to nourish the fish is one of the most significant contributors to the industry’s GHG emissions.

According to Prof. Jun Xu, group leader of the study, the team began by measuring the GHG emissions of four key aquaculture processes. They considered energy use, for example, the energy used to pump water, provide lighting and power vehicles on aquaculture farms. They also looked at nitrous oxide generated by the animals’ excreta and excess food in the water, and they studied the production of synthetic fertiliser applied to increase productivity. The fourth element they considered was the manufacture of feed, raw materials such as soybean meal, wheat and fishmeal, and the emissions from their production, processing and transport. They then measured the carbon footprint of each of these processes over the past 10 years, splitting the results by region and by nine major fish species groups.

Prof. Xu notes: “The results show that the production of feed materials contributed most to the GHG emissions. Spatial analysis showed that Guangdong, Hubei, Jiangsu and Shandong had the highest GHG emissions of all the 31 studied provinces, accounting for approximately 46% of all emissions.”

The team also found a significant positive correlation between regional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and GHG emissions in every province (> 0.6). Prof. Xu explains: “The aquaculture and mariculture industries have developed rapidly in China, and increased production is often accompanied by higher regional GDP. Rapid economic and social development leads to higher levels of consumer demand for products from both aquaculture and mariculture. This in turn drives expansion of these industries in provinces with a higher regional GDP.”

Advertisement

The team’s results also show that China’s aquaculture had a lower emission intensity (2.7) than the global value (3.3) published by the United Nations’Food and Agriculture Organization. They believe this is due to China’s higher percentage of bivalve production. The bivalve – an aquatic mollusk – usually sources its nutrients directly from the water, removing the need for manufactured feed.

Prof Xu says:“Studies on quantification of GHG emissions from aquaculture are scarce in China. Our study reveals, for the first time, the relationship between the relative production by species composition and spatial distribution. Importantly, it provides the scientific basis for the reduction of GHG emissions within a broader context of expanding aquaculture in the future. But it’s clear that more work is needed to better understand the mechanism of the process.”

He adds:“We suggest that local managers and governments adjust the relative proportion of species-group production and change the source of energy use to reduce the industry’s carbon footprint. We believe that this work has implications for the future of China’s aquaculture industry, and aquaculture in countries facing similar issues, such as Indonesia and Bangladesh.”

One thought on “Fish Feed Greatest Contributor To Greenhouse Gas Emissions In China’s Aquaculture Industry

  • July 14, 2022 at 6:04 pm
    Permalink

    Aquaculture is similar to all other protein conversion businesses, like chicken and pig production that take agricultural products like soybeans and convert them into food that people prefer (meat).

    If this article looked at the relative carbon footprint of pigs/chicken meat production relative to aquaculture fish/shrimp meat production the results would show that aquaculture uses about 1/3 to 1/2 the amount of feed/kg of meat on the dinner table. The food conversion efficiency of animals that don’t have to use energy to stand up or keep warm is a lot better.

    The observation that feeds are the major source of CO2 says the rest of the aquaculture process is very efficient.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.