ISSN 2330-717X

Conflict Of Dağlıq Qarabağ Calls For European Leadership – OpEd


Dağlıq Qarabağ together with seven districts on its margins is a sovereign territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan that was occupied by Armenian Armed Forces during the Armenia – Azerbaijan bloody conflict of 1988-1994.

Since the brokering of cease fire in 1994, the overall International Community has not paid a significant attention nor delivered clear messages towards the solution of such a protracted conflict that has generated over one million of Azerbaijan’s Internally Displaced People (IDP), causing a major humanitarian crisis that has endured up to present day, and is a menace to European Union security environment and a threat to its energy supply routes.

On March 29, 2019, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan H. E. Mr. Ilham Aliyev held a meeting in Vienna with Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan, to discuss the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan armed conflict.

While the format of negotiations remained unchanged, the ongoing discussions among both countries, hosted by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, did not produce any tangible outcome; nevertheless we have the inception of a new momentum in the negotiations’ process. Above all, it is imperative to ensure a complete territorial sovereignty of Azerbaijan and convince the International Community to exert pressure on Armenia to withdraw its troops from the districts of Kalbajar, Lachin, Qubadli, Jabrayil, Zangilan, Agdam, Fuzuli. Without Armenia’s substantive actions to withdraw its troops and genuine good will in refraining from escalating the daily armed provocations in the line of contact against the Azerbaijani soldiers, it is impossible to bring peace in the Southern Caucasus.

Furthermore the Armenian Government must recognize that protracted war of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding districts is not similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962, the ongoing clashes in the lands of Azerbaijan is even more complicated and has affected: its entire population; strained into economic stagnation the Caucasus region; caused an environmental disaster in Azerbaijan’s occupied territories; and reinstated development setbacks in Armenian National Economy (thwarting the country from taking a quantum leap towards free economy, war against corruption and consolidated democratic institutions).

Europe must understand that Azerbaijan over the last decade has invested a great portion of its national budget towards accommodating the Azerbaijani families that were forced to leave the war torn region of Nagorno-Karabakh; today more than three hundred thousand Azerbaijani Women suffer from depression and psychological distress due to violent ethnic cleansing, cruel-barbarian mass murders orchestrated by Armenian Armed Forces in their native villages in early 1990s.

The occupation and destructive policy of Armenia against Azerbaijan’s territory and its people, constant provocations in the border line with Autonomous Republic of Nakhchivan (Azerbaijan) including the April 11th armed provocations by Armenian Forces with heavy machine guns; illustrate a high level of mistrust that will accompany the regularly languid dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan, therefore results oriented negotiations are not expected in the foreseeable future.

Meanwhile the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding districts, in addition to ethnic cleansing conducted by Armenian authorities against Azerbaijani innocent civilian population (two decades ago), is currently deeply affected from high levels of deforestation, contaminated fresh water resources, barbaric illegal mining enterprises that are ruining its soil fertility and forever destroying its farmlands.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan recently issued a statement advocating for “an atmosphere of peace”, however the peaceful settlement of Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is impossible without a complete withdrawal of the occupying Armenian forces from Azerbaijan’s territories and organizing the return of the forcibly expelled Azerbaijani IDPs to these lands.

The Republic of Azerbaijan is a peace-loving country, a nation with a steady economic growth that has delivered tangible results in the war against poverty and malnutrition; a country with admirable infrastructure and urban development projects that are envied in Europe. Although twenty percent of its territory is under Armenian occupation, the Government of Azerbaijan and President Ilham Aliyev have shown a great sense of statecraft when it comes to solving this armed conflict by peaceful means. European Security Organizations and NATO must strive, in a coordinated effort, to bring a lasting peace in the Caucasus and eliminate the persisting residues of a bloody conflict that erupted when the Iron Curtain was crumbling and Germany was reunified.

Yerevan must be persuaded to embrace a timetable of actions that could raise the level of confidence and trust in the future negotiations with Azerbaijan; the first step must be the complete withdrawal of Armenian Forces from Kalbajar, Nagorno-Karabakh territories. Armenia’s belligerent attitude, disinformation campaign, manipulative propaganda and slander against Azerbaijan are simply a minefield (highly hazardous) that must not be minified by Brussels, Washington and Moscow. Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict must receive an unabated approach by European Union security mechanisms; the OSCE Minsk Group of Co-Chairs has become a tool of Yerevan’s struggle to preserve its enduring status-quo.

At a time when Azerbaijan is commemorating its 100th anniversary of bilateral strategic partnership established with the United Kingdom, it is highly beneficial for all parties to have London play a greater role in this process. Simultaneously the White House’s good will and germane actions of President Donald Trump embody an optimistic future towards ensuring Azerbaijan’s recovery of its full territorial sovereignty, return of its IDPs in their native lands, and encouraging a brighter economic growth for Armenia and its people.

The talks of Vienna, were somewhat a positive step forward, however European leadership has the indispensable duty to arrange containment measures while hosting multiple hors d’oeuvre sessions; but one thing is certain that EU and Washington are years away from striking a lasting peace in the Caucasus.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

Peter Tase

Peter Tase is a freelance writer and journalist of International Relations, Latin American and Southern Caucasus current affairs. He is the author of America's first book published on the historical and archeological treasures of the Autonomous Republic of Nakhchivan (Republic of Azerbaijan); has authored and published four books on the Foreign Policy and current economic – political events of the Government of Azerbaijan. Tase has written about International Relations for Eurasia Review Journal since June 2012.

2 thoughts on “Conflict Of Dağlıq Qarabağ Calls For European Leadership – OpEd

  • April 16, 2019 at 3:28 am

    The author of this article, Peter Tase, goes downhill fast starting with his first sentence. If “Dağlıq Qarabağ [Nagorno-Karabakh], together with seven districts on its margins, is a sovereign territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan” is accurate, it means Azerbaijan exercises supremacy of authority or rule over the land noted. Since Azerbaijan neither has authority nor rules any of the regions indicated, the basis for Tase’s article is categorically false. Also, The Republic of Azerbaijan didn’t exist in 1988.

    Tase has been publicly exposed plagiarizing in previous articles such as posting an article on culture, the text of which was from a Baku museum tourist brochure. Tase also published Azerbaijani revisionism multiple times, the most blatant of which claimed the fifth-century Armenian historian Movses Khorenasti was Azerbaijani by changing his name to M. Khorenali, as was the historian Movses Dashkhurantsi whose name became M. Dashhkhuranli.

    The region of Nagorno-Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan’s land claims against Armenia, which also includes the entire southern half of Armenia, and its capital, Yerevan.

    No negotiation will succeed if based on a zero-sum. Azerbaijan demands the indigenous Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh remove all means of self-defense and release the sovereignty they achieved in 1994. This is not going to happen.

    Yerevan, Armenia

  • April 17, 2019 at 8:04 pm

    If there’s any doubt about the bias that Peter Tase carries on his shoulders is the first two words of his article, Dağlıq Qarabağ . He, for a moment, forgets that his article is in English. Why write in the Azeri-Turkish language? The internationally accepted moniker addressing this issue is Nagorno-Karabakh, although a Russian designation but written in Latin letters not Cyrillic.

    Peter Tase has time and again proven that he espouses overt pro-Azeri opinions, no doubt in fulfillment of contractual obligations with Baku. He often comes across “more Catholic than the Pope” in spewing anti-Armenian rhetoric, and overtly “loving” Azerbaijan. No doubt his masters in Azerbaijan are quite content with their investment in this so-called research scholar.

    Peter Tase, you are easily dismissed as you are a fraud.

    Zareh Sahakian
    Montreal, Canada


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *