By David Rosnick
The Consumer Price Index declined 0.2 percent in June—the first fall in the broad measure since a 0.2 percent drop in June of last year. The headline rate of inflation has declined steadily since peaking in March, but the decline is driven almost entirely by food and particularly energy prices. The latter fell 4.4 percent in June following a 1.0 percent fall in May. As a result, headline inflation stands at 1.5 percent annualized over the last three months.
With falling energy prices and more modest rises in food, core inflation is running higher than overall. Last month, core inflation rose 0.3 percent and at a 2.9 percent annualized rate over the last three months.
The price of owner’s-equivalent rent rose 0.16 percent in June—the largest such rise since March of 2009. Rent proper, which had been rising faster than owners’-equivalent rent, increased only 0.11 percent in the month. This reversal likely reflects savings in energy costs, which spill over into rent prices. Both measures of housing rent are quite low — showing 1.2 and 1.3 percent annualized rates of growth since March.
Falling gas prices pushed inflation in transportation down to -1.9 percent. Public transportation, sensitive to energy prices, had been running inflation of 21.4 percent annualized from December to March, but has since fallen at a 9.5 percent rate.
The price of new cars rose 1.0 percent in June and has now run at a 10.1 percent annualized rate over the last three months. As discussed previously, this is in part a seasonal adjustment problem attributable to later rollouts of the new models, and there has been some supply disruption due to the tsunami in Japan.
The price of used vehicles—though not directly affected by the same issues—has increased at a 16.8 percent annualized rate since March. However, the delay in rollout means that consumers holding out for a 2012-model vehicle have withheld their current cars from the used market. Thus, there are bound to be considerable spillover effects that may be reversed over the second half of the year.
Elsewhere in core prices, erratic apparel prices jumped 1.4 percent in June and ran at an 11.5 percent annualized rate over the last three months. Nevertheless, prices are only up 1.9 percent since June of 2009. Medical care rose 0.2 percent in June. Medical care commodities, which constitute about one-quarter of medical care prices, fell 0.1 percent.
Producer prices for finished goods fell 0.4 percent in June. This is the fourth consecutive month of disinflation in the headline Producer Price Index as energy prices slowed and fell—the latter down 2.8 percent last month. The price of core finished goods rose 0.3 percent in June. Since January, this category has run a steady 3.2 percent annualized rate of inflation.
Nonfuel import prices fell 0.1 percent in June. Over the last three months, inflation in nonfuel imports has slowed to a 4.1 percent annualized rate compared with 8.1 percent in the prior three months. June import prices stood only 2.1 percent above their peak level in August 2008. Similarly, nonagricultural export prices were flat in the month, but the 6.1 percent annualized rate of inflation since March is well below the 14.1 percent rate three months prior.
There has been corresponding slackening of inflation at earlier stages of production. Core intermediate goods prices rose 0.3 percent in June and at a 9.4 percent annualized rate over the last three months compared with a 12.5 percent rate over the three months ending in March. Similarly, inflation in core crude goods stands at 11.8 percent annualized since March compared with 17.7 percent over the three months prior.
While the fall in energy prices has brought down headline inflation, core rates remain modest if above recent lows. With pressure slackening as evidenced by disinflation in producer and trade prices, there is little reason to expect rapid price gains. Of much more concern is the weak growth in hourly wages. Relative to core prices, the average wage is only up five cents per hour in the last 30 months. This 0.1 percent annualized rate of real wage growth leaves little optimism for households’ ability to pay off their debts and reignite the economic engine.
David Rosnick is an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from North Carolina State University and his M.A. in Economics from George Washington University.