ISSN 2330-717X

An Open Letter To Daw Aung San Suu Kyi Regarding The Rohingya Issue

By

By Aung Aung Oo

My dear Mother Suu,

I am one of the internal refugees of your country living in a muddy and miserable camp of Sittwe, the World know the reason of being refugees in Arakan State.

Your father, our national independence architect, General Aung San, was brilliant national hero who sowed the seed of democracy in Myanmar soil, who made just and fair foundation of national constitution in 1947 in which all ethnic groups could happily participate including 2 Rohingya scholars. He knew both Rakhine and Rohingya very well, he was reported in detail information of Arakan State by Bo Yan Naing who was responsible for Arakan State in his time.

Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi

When you wrote “ Freedom from Fear”, we were very happy and learnt many things from your writing. We admire you and your father, our national hero. Your father and you gave us advices to follow the reality and to be honest, just, and kind.
Rohingya issue became an international issue since 1970s. UN, NGOs, and all of the World leaders know it. When you said “ I don’t know Rohingya “, I was so shocked. How could a Noble Prize Winner deny a reality? Could you please let us know that based on what documents did you dare to deny Rohingya? There are hundreds of historical documents and monuments, thousands of historians including Rakhine, Bamar, and foreign scholars wrote about Arkanese Muslims, Rohingya.

If you think that Rohingya history is not reliable, and then you could better form a commission of World historians who could easily decide authenticity of Rohingya history, you shouldn’t deny its existence.

There were more than 140 ethnic groups including Rohingya in Burma. Dictator Ne Win reduced the numbers to 135 which included Kokant, and Wa, two newly recognized ethnics, in order to deprive the right of Muslims and Christains minorities. You opposed Ne Win but you would like to agree his idea. I don’t hate dictators but I hate their ideas. You don’t like the name, Myanmar instead of Burma because it was not decided in democratic way. Why do you like dictators’ decision of annihilating Rohingya who were approved by your father , second national hero U Nu, and parliament democratic government. U Nu was accused of religious person who wanted to make Burma as a Buddhist country but he didn’t deny Rohingya like racist dictators.

You wrote: It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it. Most Burmese are familiar with the four a-gati, the four kinds of corruption. Chanda-gati, corruption induced by desire,is deviation from the right path in pursuit of bribes or for the sake of those one loves. Dosagati is taking the wrong path to spite those against whom one bears ill will, and moga-gati is aberration due to ignorance. But perhaps the worst of the four is bhaya-gati, for not only does bhaya, fear, stifle and slowly destroy all sense of right and wrong, it so often lies at the root of the other three kinds of corruption. Just as chanda-gati, when not the result of sheer avarice, can be caused by fear of want or fear of losing the goodwill of those one loves, so fear of being surpassed, humiliated or injured in some way can provide the impetus for ill will. And it would be difficult to dispel ignorance unless there is freedom to pursue the truth unfettered by fear. With so close a relationship between fear and corruption it is little
wonder that in any society where fear is rife corruption in all forms becomes deeply entrenched.

You encouraged us not to be fear but why do you have fear now. Isn’t it for losing power by getting vote in the next election? Or could you please tell us the reason for denial of reality?

You wrote very beautifully regarding human right: In an age when immense technological advances have created lethal weapons which could be, and are, used by the powerful and the unprincipled to dominate the weak and the helpless, there is a compelling need for a closer relationship between politics and ethics at both the national and international levels. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations proclaims that ‘every individual and every organ of society’ should strive to promote the basic rights and freedoms to which all human beings regardless of race, nationality or religion are entitled. But as long as there are governments whose authority is founded on coercion rather than on the mandate of the people, and interest groups which place short-term profits above long-term peace and prosperity, concerted international action to protect and promote human rights will remain at best a partially realized struggle. There will continue to be arenas of struggle where victims of oppression have to draw on their own inner resources to defend their inalienable rights as members of the human family.

Don’t you feel that Rohingya are also human being like you? Do you want to implement neo-racism in Burma? I attached you some statements of Rohingya raped victims, I was informed 500 rape cases. I have hundreds of photo and video evidences which are against human rights.

If you want I can send all those evidences to you.

You wrote: Within a system which denies the existence of basic human rights, fear tends to be the order of the day. Fear of imprisonment, fear of torture, fear of death, fear of losing friends, family, property or means of livelihood, fear of poverty, fear of isolation, fear of failure. A most insidious form of fear is that which masquerades as common sense or even wisdom, condemning as foolish, reckless, insignificant or futile the small, daily acts of courage which help to preserve man’s self-respect and inherent human dignity. It is not easy for a people conditioned by fear under the iron rule of the principle that might is right to free themselves from the enervating miasma of fear. Yet even under the most crushing state machinery courage rises up again and again, for fear is not the natural state of civilized man.

You know the condition of iron rule but you don’t want to be practical regarding Rohingya issue, why? Could you please tell us the reason?

You said:
When I met Burmese migrant workers and refugees during my recent visit to Thailand, many cried out: “Don’t forget us!” They meant: “don’t forget our plight, don’t forget to do what you can to help us, don’t forget we also belong to your world.” When the Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to me they were recognizing that the oppressed and the isolated in Burma were also a part of the world, they were recognizing the oneness of humanity. So for me receiving the Nobel Peace Prize means personally extending my concerns for democracy and human rights beyond national borders. The Nobel Peace Prize opened up a door in my heart.

Everyday people are dying in the Rohingya Camps, most of them died lack of health care; pregnant women, children, and aged people. Today, Fathawli, 26, daughter of Abul Kalam from Thechaung Camp died during the delivery, both mother and baby died. There is no medication in Muslim Camps. If you look Buddhist Rakhine so called Camp , you can see doctors, nurses, and medicine store. Where have your voices of human rights gone? Why are you so silent? Who forced you to close your mouth? Isn’t it fear?

Every human being has a right giving a name to his or her child. Every group has a right to give its own name even according to 2008 Myanmar law. Concerning Rohingya, you don’t want to recognize their name and you don’t like restoring their citizenship rights which was approved by the elected parliament democratic government. What is the reason for these double standards?

Since 1948, Rakhine people have been enjoying in full ethic rights, and in 1976 promoted them with State right too; for them, Rakhine State is a Paradise but for the Rohingya it is not more than hell-like prison since 1970s. Hundreds of operations had already been conducted by military, immigration staffs, and security forces to find out illegal immigrants from Bangladesh but they failed to prove even a single family. You can see thousands of Rohingya refugees all over the world, you may hear boat people, and thousands of Rohingya were killed while travelling to Yangon and other countries.

In Bangladesh, there were more than 3 million Rakhine Buddhists before Burmese Independence but now it reduced to less than one million, nobody asked where the rest has gone, why? You can not see any Myanmar ambassador who is Muslim, Bangladesh has many officers and ambassador who is Buddhists, current Bangladesh ambassador of Myanmar is a Buddhist.
Politic shouldn’t be a dirty game, it should be a way toward peaceful global family. In a family, everyone can eat according to his or her choice but no one has a right to force eating what he or she doesn’t like, no one has right to blame or criticize.
If you have a mother’s Metta, affection, please raise your voice for us too as you do for other ethnics.

Yours extremely suffering son,

Aung Aung Oo
Chain Pain Road
Kun Dan Quarter
Sittwe(Akyab)
Myanmar(Burma)

 

The views expressed are the author’s own

8 thoughts on “An Open Letter To Daw Aung San Suu Kyi Regarding The Rohingya Issue

  • Avatar
    September 18, 2012 at 3:11 pm
    Permalink

    Aung Aung Oo, who time-consuming frequents on Facebook, can’t be one of the internal refugees ‘of your country living in a muddy and miserable camp of Sittwe’, like he said in this article.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    September 18, 2012 at 3:57 pm
    Permalink

    very good writing. keep go on brother. don’t be afraid to show the reality. we are always the one.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    September 18, 2012 at 7:06 pm
    Permalink

    Yes brother Aung Aung Oo Sittwe(Akyab)keep it up excellent your expression. Mother Suu said she doesn’t know the Rohingya in Europe trip and she also said the lacking law and order restoration in Myanmar another important word. Her silence on Rohingya is perhaps on it. Go ahead…….

    Reply
  • Avatar
    September 18, 2012 at 10:12 pm
    Permalink

    Since Daw Aung San Suu Kyi did not support their undeserved rights, now their propagandists are attacking her. Who cares? Nobody will pay attention on their personal attacks. She was accepted by the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the White House.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    September 19, 2012 at 3:16 pm
    Permalink

    Author does not seem to read what ASSK has explained several times, nor does he understand the international law, and sovereign right of every state.

    Top of that, there are uncountable atrocities going on since the problem started. The muslim world has created hatreds against Myanmar using pictures of dead bodies, including the burnt dead bodies of Christians in Nigeria. If anyone believe in such propaganda, you are all missing the important points here.

    Reply
    • Avatar
      September 20, 2012 at 6:05 pm
      Permalink

      Same thing Myanmar local journey are used fake photos and put blame on Muslim…
      What u did what u get….
      Just be fair for other religion…
      I have seen many abusive words to Islam at Facebook..
      Buddha doesn’t teach us to insult other religion..

      Reply
  • Avatar
    September 19, 2012 at 3:38 pm
    Permalink

    Sorry A A U, your historian who back up your claim are in valid because they are also confused the origin of the Rohingya which was the name given to the Rakhines by the Bengalese from former India as you are given a name Kawtaw (Kawtaw kala etc) by us. Daw Suu is not a nut so that she would not stand up in front of thieves like a shield. She has to defend her own brothers and sisters Raknines. This is very simple logic.

    If you were Rohingyas, let me ask a question, why you didn’t use when you started armed rebellion in 1947? Why did you name it as Mujaheden Rebellion or insurgency. We called you at that time as Kalaso (Bad Indians) Insurgents.

    My advice to you and your brothers is: Behave yourselves!!

    Reply
  • Avatar
    October 1, 2012 at 11:52 am
    Permalink

    I am part of the Burmese Diaspora, lived overseas most of my adult life, did not agree with what the military has done to our country. But this Rohingya issue is Sooo bogus to us, and as we are trying to rebuild our nation, I wish these people will leave us alone for a while.
    Your agenda is to get something out of nothing (typical of you over history)…and believe me, we would have paid anything (perhaps even some territory) if out will leave us alone to rebuild our nation.
    And you can’t invoke the case of the Wa (the legacy of the Khmer empire, which predates many things and nations in the region!)

    Did you all actually reflect on the fact that throughout history, you have done nothing but kill, start armed insurrections, sic Muammar Gaddafi on impoverished Myanmar, lived a totally negative attitude to our indigent people, and THEN write phony syrupy notes to Daw ASSK, to further your land grab!
    HOw could anyone like or want you!
    Be introspective for once in you history. Surely you don’t want to be together with people you never feel kin-ship to?
    Or is it really important for you to get the Rakhine land that you have no claim to?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.