ISSN 2330-717X

Amidst Fragmentation And Dispossession: Which Palestine? – OpEd

By

By Fida Jiryis

Throughout contemporary history, movement of people outside their own countries for long or short intervals has occurred for various reasons: education, work, marriage, family ties, fleeing hardships, and so on. Foreigners exist in every country in the world, forming their own sub-societies and clinging with varying degrees to their own cultures as they integrate into the new ones. Sometimes, the second or third generations that arise after this movement experience the drive to return to their home countries, find their roots and re-integrate into their societies of origin.

Normally, this process is a long and difficult one. It is affected, of course, by a myriad of varying factors such as the degree of comfort and cohesion of the recipient culture, the individual’s characteristics of inner strength, adaptability and persistence, the economic and social situation, and the degree of welcome extended to returning expatriates. The success or failure of the process depends on a complex interplay between all these factors, and, to a large extent, upon the individual and his or her reasons for making the move.

Even if the person is completely convinced of those reasons, moving ‘back’ is usually a challenging, overwhelming process. One leaves behind all that is familiar in their lives: their home, friends, social network, work, culture, physical surroundings, amenities such as transport, health and entertainment, and comes to a new terrain where they will have to relearn everything: from how to find their way around, to where the supermarket is, how to deal with the currency, through to the more complex business of speaking another language, picking up new cultural nuances (even if some knowledge of them is there), and forging a fit – or not – with this new/original culture.

This is difficult enough in a normal country with a relatively calm environment, stable political system and established societies and modes of living.

Divided Palestine: 64 Years of Division and Occupation

In the case of Palestine, integration of returnees is fraught with even greater difficulty. The initial hit that the country took in 1948, as a result of the establishment of Israel, resulted in a mass exodus of Palestinians and destroyed much of Palestine’s social fabric almost overnight. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were uprooted from their homes and scattered in refugee camps either internally in Palestine or externally in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. Over time, some of them moved to the Gulf countries, while others moved to Europe or the Americas. Successive attacks by Israel and more occupation and annexation of Palestinian land created more and more refugees at each turn. They also created another, serious problem: the divide, as a result of the 1967 war, between ‘Israel proper’ and the Palestinian occupied territories, and the effective severing, as a result of the 1993 Oslo process, of the ties between these two areas as the Palestinian Authority was established in the latter territories.

The result? Today, sixty-four years after the loss of Palestine and establishment of Israel, we have a shredded and fragmented Palestinian population, with ‘flavors’ depending on the place each segment ended up in: the West Bank, Gaza, Galilee, Jaffa, Jerusalem. Each one of these represents an ecosystem entirely different from that of the others. Within them, we have subsystems. In the West Bank, Ramallah, dubbed ‘the bubble’ due to its proliferation of modern amenities, foreigners and Western lifestyles, has an entirely different society from Hebron and Nablus, and is another world even from its surrounding, traditional villages. Gaza, after years of brutal Israeli targeting, bloodshed and continued closure, is a closed, agonized society that has been left to fend for its own survival. Jerusalem is a surreal, tense, depressed city – and when we say ‘Jerusalem’ in the Palestinian context, we mean only the East of it, which lies amidst the sprawling, vicious Jewish settlements illegally gobbling up land everywhere and forcing Palestinian residents into suffocation or expulsion. Jaffa is another depressed enclave, lying wretchedly next to Tel Aviv like a beggar left standing outside the gate of a palace.

The Galilee is another basket altogether. Being inside Israel, and with its Palestinian population being Israeli citizens, the Galilee is home to what are termed the ‘1948 Arabs,’ ‘Arabs of inside,’ ‘Arabs inside the Green Line,’ and various other demarcations meant to indicate their Israeli citizenship versus Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza, who hold the Palestinian ID. ‘Israeli Arabs,’ as they are often referred to in a great oxymoron of a term, are in a confused, difficult situation of living and working in the state of Israel but being second, or tenth, class citizens. They have lost their links to the Arab world due to decades of prohibition and being cut off by Israel, yet they can never fully integrate into Israel, which simply doesn’t want them because they are not Jewish.

Scattered across the World

This is only part of the story. When we look outside historical Palestine, we have Palestinian refugees in each of the neighboring Arab countries as well as in the Gulf. None of these segments identify with any of the others, for a Palestinian refugee in Lebanon has a different context, ecosystem and surrounding culture from one living in Syria or Jordan. The Gulf countries, with their work opportunities and wealth, have spawned yet another segment, one which was instrumental in supporting its families in other countries and which accumulated, in some cases, large fortunes and led a life of bourgeoisie highly different from the experience of refugees in the poverty-stricken camps. Palestinians in the US and Europe also did well, for to survive in these societies, they had to acquire good education and employment, and today there is a significant, successful, expatriate Palestinian population in the West.

This mind-boggling array of destinations happened not by natural evolution but by a large-scale, forced exodus, making its impact on society drastic and long lasting. As a result, today, when you talk to a Palestinian, you will have a vastly different experience depending on the stations that s/he inhabited in their life. My efforts to piece together, in my mind, some kind of cohesive standard for my people in terms of their culture, norms, ways of thinking, aspirations, and outlook, have been impossible. There is, sadly, very little in common between a Palestinian young woman in Ramallah and her compatriot in Haifa, for example, save for the commonalities of gender. They have completely different realities. Although there are many exceptions, most Palestinians living in Israel struggle with defining their identity, and only few feel a connection or relevance to the larger Palestinian collective. Recent years have seen an awakening among the younger generations, but the majority continue to exist in a warped vacuum; most will not say ‘Palestinian’ if you ask them their nationality, but some other, vague answer, due to years of Israeli isolation.

Similarly, there is no cultural cohesion between Palestinians who grew up in neighboring Arab countries and those who remained in Palestine. A friend of mine, after growing up in Cyprus, then in Syria, relocated to Ramallah as a young woman after the Oslo process. She describes the very difficult integration of such ‘returnees,’ as her and her family were dubbed by the locals, and the constant struggle of these returnees to set up a life in Palestine. This comes as no surprise, as the locals saw the newcomers as coming to take over the country, while the newcomers struggled with feeling unwelcome in their own homeland.

The Struggle to Reconnect and Unify

Amidst this, one must pause to ask the question of how such a society can really hope to create a national homeland. There needs to be an awareness of our fragmentation and a labor of concerted efforts to bridge the gaps between us. We cannot continue to exist in separate enclaves and reduce the struggle of the entire Palestinian people to an aspiration for a ‘state’ in a fifth of our historical land – and a state divided into ghettos and riddled with illegal Jewish settlements, at that. When such ideas are discussed, my heart aches, for I automatically begin to think: ‘What about the other Palestinians everywhere else? What happens to them?’

Faten Khoury, another friend of mine and an actress and drama trainer from Nazareth, is working on a drama training project with groups of children from Ramallah and Haifa, with the specific focus of bridging the gap between them and bringing them together. The group from Ramallah cannot visit the one in Haifa, for they need permits from Israel to be able to enter. The group from Haifa cannot come to Ramallah, for the Israeli Ministry of Education, under whose jurisdiction their school falls, prohibits students from entering the Palestinian territories.

If we can’t get twenty schoolchildren together, isn’t it time we slow down on all the talk of ‘establishing the state’ and look around us first? Which Palestine? Where? And who will it represent and entitle to live in it? Can we simply exclude the hundred segments of Palestinians out there in the world, tell them ‘tough luck,’ and accept this tiny shred of a ‘solution’?

Or do we need to look at a much bigger picture, of who we are as a people, how we represent ourselves, and how to begin talking to each other despite all the divides imposed on us?

Fida Jiryis is a Palestinian writer, editor, and author of Hayatuna Elsagheera (Our Small Life), 2011, a collection of Arabic short stories depicting village life in the Galilee. Contact her at: [email protected] (This article was published in The Palestine Monitor – www.palestinemonitor.org.)



Please Donate Today
Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.

Palestine Chronicle

Palestine Chronicle

The Palestine Chronicle publishes news and commentary related to the Middle East Peace Conflict.

2 thoughts on “Amidst Fragmentation And Dispossession: Which Palestine? – OpEd

  • Avatar
    May 19, 2012 at 6:47 pm
    Permalink

    Since when are the kids of the kids of the original parents now suddenly refugees?

    Mass exodus: I agree. They put themselves in exile thinking they could return two laters and all the Jews had been killed.

    Now, let’s start talking about the mass exodus of 850,000 Jews that were kicked out of Lebanon. Strange how they emigrate elsewhere and scattered and they are not calling themselves refugees. ON the contrary, they have improved the life of every country they immigrated into, contrary to palestinian arabs who just keep on, and on and on… with the false propagande story.

    Gratefully, more and more people have been discovering the truth behind the massive palestinian arab lies about what happened in 1948.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    May 27, 2012 at 5:23 pm
    Permalink

    Krystal 10

    Why do you Lie? by saying quote:”Now, let’s start talking about the mass exodus of 850,000 Jews that were kicked out of Lebanon”.

    I was in Beirut from 1947 to 1948, What you are saying is not true. There never were 850,000 Jews in Lebanon. Perhaps you were thinking about the Palestinians who were forcibly expelled out of their Palestine by the Zionist Jews in Palestine in 1948.

    In 1948 there were 5000- 20,000 or as much 24, 000 LEBANESE Jews in Lebanon. Acordng to the Jewush Virtual Library there were 20,000

    Jewish Exodus From Arab and Muslims Countries
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries

    Jews in Lebanon
    The area now known as Lebanon was the home of one of the oldest Jewish communities in the world, dating back to at least 300 BCE. In 1948, there were approximately 24,000 Jews in Lebanon.[47] The largest communities of Jews in Lebanon were in Beirut, and the villages near Mount Lebanon, Deir al Qamar, Barouk, Bechamoun, and Hasbaya. While the French mandate saw a general improvement in conditions for Jews, the Vichy regime placed restrictions on them. The Jewish community actively supported Lebanese independence after World War II and had mixed attitudes toward Zionism.[citation needed]

    Unlike in other Arab countries, the Lebanese Jewish community did not face grave peril during the 1948 Arab-Israel War and was reasonably protected by governmental authorities. Lebanon was also the only Arab country that saw a post-1948 increase in its Jewish population, principally due to the influx of Jewish refugees coming from Syria and Iraq.[6]

    Reference 47. • ^ Hendler, Sefi (August 19, 2006). “Beirut’s last Jews”. Ynet. Retrieved on 2007-05-22.There were approximately 24, 000 Jews in Lebanon

    Reference 83. Jewish Virtual Library The Jews of Lebanon by Michael Bard
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/lebjews.html

    1948 Jewish population: 20,000
    2008: Fewer than 1001

    When Christian Arabs ruled Lebanon, Jews enjoyed relative toleration. In the mid-50’s, approximately 7,000 Jews lived in Beirut. As Jews in an Arab country, however, their position was never secure, and the majority left in 1967.

    Fighting in the 1975-76 Muslim-Christian civil war swirled around the Jewish Quarter in Beirut, damaging many Jewish homes, businesses and synagogues. Most of the remaining 1,800 Lebanese Jews emigrated in 1976, fearing the growing Syrian presence in Lebanon would curtail their freedom. Most Jews went to Europe (particularly France), the United States and Canada.

    History of the Jews in Lebanon
    Wikkipedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Lebanon

    Beirut’s Last Jews
    YNet Jewish World
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3292543,00.html
    Sefi Hendler
    Published:08.19.06, 11:11 / Israel Jewish Scene

    “It was a very beautiful city. Jews, Druze, Shiites, Sunnis, Christians – everyone lived in peace and was neighborly and friendly. There were very few problems between us. We then had sixteen synagogues in Beirut; they were all full.”

    “The Shiites? They were the Jews’ friends. There were many Jewish doctors who treated them. I remember Dr. Shames; he was legendary in Lebanon in those years. He only treated Shiites. Most of them were poor, and they couldn’t pay him with money. They would pay him with chickens, eggs, oil, figs, and raisins.”

    But when the civil war broke out, the idyll came to an end. Much of the Jewish community left the city, and, according to Moshe, no more than 1,800 Jews remained in Beirut.

    “Starting from 1975, the Jews who lived in the Wadi Abu Jamil neighborhood, the Jewish quarter, were actually protected by Yasser Arafat’s Fatah. Then, they would still differentiate between a Jew and an Israeli.”

    Dr. Arthur F. Billy
    5-26-12

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.