ISSN 2330-717X

The Global Jobless Recovery – Analysis

By

By Daniel Lacalle*

The United States added 1.76 million Jobs in July 2020, compared to a consensus estimate of 1.48 million. Unemployment fell to 10.2 percent versus the 10.6 percent expected. It is true that the rate of job creation is slowing down and labor force participation rate remains at 61.4 percent, but we need to compare the figures with those of the rest of the world, where we are witnessing a worrying “jobless recovery.”

Headline official unemployment rates are misleading due to different subsidies and furloughed jobs. If we use comparable figures, the United States’s inactive share of the labor force is significantly smaller than the same figure in the eurozone. In the eurozone, those who are unemployed, in subsidized jobless schemes, and furloughed account for more than 23 percent of the labor force, according to Morgan Stanley. This compares with the United States’s 16.5 percent sum of unemployed plus not at work plus excess dropouts. It is a particularly important difference that shows that the United States is outperforming in the recovery. It also shows something that many commentators ignore: massive entitlements and government spending plans have not helped the eurozone improve its job market in the recovery.

In this crisis, there have been two policies when addressing the unemployment challenge: dynamism versus intervention in job mechanisms. The second has allowed the eurozone to have an optically low unemployment rate while around 40 million workers remain in furlough schemes. Preserving labor market dynamism may have created alarming headlines for the United States, but it has allowed it to recover faster and to post unemployment numbers, both official and underemployment rates, that would be the envy of many eurozone countries.

Now that we have established the differences between both economies, we must alert of a global problem: the jobless recovery.

Markets and investment analysts have greeted the latest global PMI (purchasing managers’ index) figures with euphoria. Most leading economies posted PMIs in expansion in July, and the global index pointed to a return to growth both in services and manufacturing…But companies continued to shed jobs after three months of reopening.

If we analyze the job component of global PMIs published by IHS Markit, we can see that all sectors except three continued to destroy jobs in July 2020 as firms faced overcapacity and weak growth in sales. The worst job losses came in the Auto and Auto Parts sector, Media, Metals and Mining, Technology Equipment, and Tourism and Recreation. The only sectors that created jobs in July on a global level were Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Healthcare Services, and Real Estate. The most worrying part is that the real estate job creation was mostly temporary and seasonal.

A global PMI recovery with widespread job destruction shows us that most of the headline PMIs simply reflect a month-on-month bounce from depressed levels, not a return to precovid industry levels. Yes, there is a recovery, but—as we have mentioned in this column before—if governments don’t implement significant supply-side measures that incentivize new business creation and growth in small ones, we may find that the global activity trend weakens almost as fast as it bounced.

So far, the United States is leading in employment improvement, but the full recovery is extremely far away. The United States cannot be complacent and accept an unemployment rate of 9.3 percent in 2020 falling to 5.5 percent in 2022 as the Federal Reserve predicts. Unemployment needs to be back to the precovid 3.5 percent rate quickly, and that will only be achieved with bold supply-side measures, tax incentives, and a strong policy of capital attraction. The United States needs to separate itself from other governments’ policies. It must liberalize and cut red tape to boost job creation, because the recovery is stalling in many developed and emerging economies, and copying failed interventionist measures will not bring employment back.

Originally published at dlacalle.com.

*About the author: Daniel Lacalle, PhD, economist and fund manager, is the author of the bestselling books Freedom or Equality (2020),Escape from the Central Bank Trap (2017), The Energy World Is Flat (2015), and Life in the Financial Markets (2014). He is a professor of global economy at IE Business School in Madrid.

Source: This article was also published at the MISES Institute

MISES

MISES

The Mises Institute, founded in 1982, teaches the scholarship of Austrian economics, freedom, and peace. The liberal intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) guides us. Accordingly, the Mises Institute seeks a profound and radical shift in the intellectual climate: away from statism and toward a private property order. The Mises Institute encourages critical historical research, and stands against political correctness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.