ISSN 2330-717X

Bosnia: Debates Begin Over 2013 Census

By

By Anes Alic

The last population census in Bosnia was conducted in 1991, just prior to the 1992-1995 conflict. At the time, its population of 4.4 million consisted of 43% Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks), 31% Bosnian Serbs and 17% Bosnian Croats — many of them living in mixed communities.

A lot has changed since then.

Nearly half the country’s population was displaced during the conflict, many seeking safety abroad, but the majority were internally displaced.

Today, there are no accurate population statistics.

After five years of dead-end political negotiations, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s ruling parties agreed earlier this month to conduct a national census, scheduled for April 2013.

Analysts say that it is fairly predictable that the census will show the country’s citizens living in ethnic enclaves, with the exception of larger urban areas.

“The war cleared the path for ethnically clean bubbles, but in the years after the war politicians encouraged further dislocation of ethnic minorities to areas controlled by their own ethnic groups,” Mirhunisa Zukic, president of NGO Bosnian Union for Sustainable Return, told SETimes.

In particular, the majority living in the entity Republika Srpska are Bosnian Serbs, along with an estimated 4% Bosniak and Bosnian Croat minority, most of whom are returnees to rural areas.

The reverse will emerge in the other entity, Federation of BiH (FBiH), dominated by Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats. Furthermore, the census is expected show clear ethnic lines between Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats within FBiH.

While other Western Balkan countries held headcounts in 2011, BiH opted out, having unsuccessfully debated the idea for years.

Bosniaks opposed anyone stating their ethnicity, religion and language in the census, arguing it would give credence to attempts to ethnically cleanse the country.

Republika Srpska officials objected to the census because laws ensured that power sharing among ethnic groups would continue to be based on population numbers from the 1991 census.

According to a deal struck in December, ethnicity, language and religion will be optional fields on the census, but power sharing continues to be a cause for controversy.

At the request of Bosnian Serbs, officials agreed to delete Article 48 of the bill, which envisions the 1991 ethnic quotas as a basis for public posts.

The bill now states that the power sharing will be based on the results of the new census, but only after the process of refugee returns is completed. Zukic said that process will take years, as there are 60,000 people waiting to return and many others who have no desire to come back.

Following the deletion of Article 48, the Bosniak Party for Democratic Action (SDA) — a member of the ruling coalition — came under attack by opposition parties and the intellectual elite for what they perceived as a betrayal of ethnic interests.

“We initiated a compromise that ended a stalemate and made the census possible,” Erdal Selmanovic, an SDA spokesman, told SETimes. “We didn’t betray any ethnic interest. Equal ethnic representation, based on the 1991 census, is guaranteed in entity and state constitutions.”

However, if the constitution guarantees rights that the census cannot override, many may ask what all the fuss has been about for the past five years. The answer lies in the fact that the census has remained a popular tool for scoring political points.

Indeed, Selmanovic acknowledged that the past five years of grappling were unnecessary and that the bill paving the way to hold the census could have been implemented long ago.

Bosniak parties that are now in the opposition are to blame, he said, though he conceded that some in his own party participated in the obstruction.

The party Selmanovic accuses, the Party for Bosnia and Herzegovina (SBiH) — formerly SDA’s coalition partner and now in the opposition — confirmed that its members are still opposed to conducting a census under the current laws.

“The country certainly needs to hold a new census, but we will never sign the existing bill,” Beriz Belkic, the president of SBiH’s political council, told SETimes.

He stressed that the two parties’ platform to reject the census bill “was agreed on by the parties’ high officials”.

“To now attempt to hide behind the constitution, which existed at the time of the agreement, is absurd,” Belkic said.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

SETimes

The Southeast European Times Web site is a central source of news and information about Southeastern Europe in ten languages: Albanian, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Croatian, English, Greek, Macedonian, Romanian, Serbian and Turkish. The Southeast European Times is sponsored by the US European Command, the joint military command responsible for US operations in 52 countries. EUCOM is committed to promoting stability, co-operation and prosperity in the region.

3 thoughts on “Bosnia: Debates Begin Over 2013 Census

  • February 25, 2012 at 3:37 am
    Permalink

    Religion, language, and ethnicity should not even be optional, they should be REMOVED.

    Bosniaks will most likely be less than they used to be in 1991 because they were attacked and killed by Bosnian Serbs en mass in the 1990’s….

    Reply
  • February 25, 2012 at 11:50 am
    Permalink

    Religion, language, and ethnicity should be answered so that the world can see the real number of Bosniaks killed are lower,exaggerated and false. Truth will prevail.

    Reply
  • February 27, 2012 at 10:06 pm
    Permalink

    I honestly don’t even see why the Bosniaks are rejecting a census so much. Most likely they will be the majority in the country and have INCREASED their numbers relative to Serbs and Croats who are emigrating from the country to thier own home republics of Serbia and Croatia. Think about. There were refugees and displaced people on ALL SIDES in the war in the 1990’s. Croats fled to Croatia and Europe, Serbs fled to Serbia and Europe, and Bosniaks fled to…where? Europe. Now that the war has ended, Bosniaks have no where else to go but return to their country in Bosnia, while Serbs and Croats have the option of either returning to Bosnia or simply staying in their own mother countries. I think the census is going to be worst for the Croats who do have their own entity and it has been known are migrating into Croatia which is economically way ahead of either Serbia or Bosnia. So in the end, I’d argue the Bosniaks are going to gain and the Croats are going to lose. Serb numbers will probably be the same because they have republika srpska as their own entity.

    The only solution to Bosnia if it wants to remain multi-ethnic is to make it a federal state with three entities: A serbian entity, a Croatian entity and a Bosniak entity.

    Having a unitary state that the Bosniaks want is completely unacceptable, since although they are the largest ethnic group in Bosnia, they are NOT A MAJORITY if you count Croats and Serbs together, who want a federalized Bosnia. So the MAJORITY of Bosnia wants a federal system, and that’s the way it should be.

    I know its hard to admit it, but Serbs and Croats have interests that collide in Bosnia and will do very well if they make a coalition which Dodik has been trying and been successful in doing. Serbian and Croatian reconcialition, contrary to what the media says, is not being achieved by Josipovic and Tadic, but by Dodik in Bosnia who has their support.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *