ISSN 2330-717X

US Signals Support For Formal NATO Black Sea Presence

By

By Joshua Kucera

A senior American NATO official has signaled support for a proposal to create a regular alliance naval presence on the Black Sea, where tension has been rising between Russia and its maritime neighbors.

“There are some very valuable discussions under way among the allies who live on the Black Sea … of more closely integrating their naval forces and operations,” said NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow, an American diplomat, referring to Bulgaria, Turkey, and Romania, Reuters reported. “We need to consider a more persistent NATO military presence in the region, with a particular focus on our maritime capabilities.”

Vershbow was apparently referring to an idea, promoted by Romania, to creating a permanent NATO presence on the sea. Romanian officials also have said that their proposal envisages cooperation with non-NATO partners on the Black Sea, in particular Georgia and Ukraine, as well as the United States. The proposal looks to be considered at the alliance’s June summit in Warsaw, as the alliance continues to build up its military presence along Russia’s borders.

Separately, the nominee to be the next NATO military commander, U.S. General Curtis Scaparrotti, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week, and while he wasn’t asked about the NATO/Black Sea proposal, he was asked about the possibility of positioning an American aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean Sea to respond to “the growth of Russian military presence in the Black Sea and in the Eastern Mediterranean.” Scaparrotti didn’t commit: “In my opinion, positioning an aircraft carrier in the Mediterranean would send a strategic message not only to the Russians but also to ISIS, and Iran and its proxies,” he said, but added that other global priorities may prevent that from being realized. He added: “Our NATO Allies including Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria play a significant role to demonstrate our presence and commitment to the region.”

Russia’s ambassador to NATO, Alexander Grushko, also addressed the question of the NATO Black Sea presence this week, and warned that the alliance should not seek to violate the Montreux Convention, which limits the amount of time that warships of countries not bordering the Black Sea can spend on the sea.

We know that among Black Sea states, Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey are maritime powers and they have fleets in the Black Sea. Whether you put them together in a group or not — that is up to the armed forces. But it is of crucial importance that the Montreux Convention regime remains inviolable. It is one of the key international agreements providing regional stability and safety….

We believe there should be no attempts to change this regime to make it easier for extra-regional powers to be present in the Black Sea

Given that NATO hasn’t given any indication that it foresees any change in the Montreux Convention, this is a fairly mild objection. But he still issued a general threat: “NATO should be in a position to know that all necessary steps will be taken from our side to neutralize the emerging threats,” Grushko added.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

Eurasianet

Originally published at Eurasianet. Eurasianet is an independent news organization that covers news from and about the South Caucasus and Central Asia, providing on-the-ground reporting and critical perspectives on the most important developments in the region. A tax-exempt [501(c)3] organization, Eurasianet is based at Columbia University’s Harriman Institute, one of the leading centers in North America of scholarship on Eurasia. Read more at eurasianet.org.

2 thoughts on “US Signals Support For Formal NATO Black Sea Presence

  • April 24, 2016 at 5:17 am
    Permalink

    Why certainly NATO should put troops into the black sea. Just like they have troops in Nigeria, and all the regions of the world where Russia is threatening to invade. I think NATO should put troops into Guantanamo immediately. We all know that NATO stands for nothing but peace, just like North Korea. We are sure of one thing in those Baltic States. They were the cause of WWI and WWII, so it stands to reason that WWIII will start and end there real quick. At 18,000 miles an hour, it only takes a few minutes for a nuke to hit anything that NATO will float off the Russian safe zone. At the rate the US is arming the world with stupidity, I figure global warming doesn’t have a chance to cause real harm. We, as a human race, won’t be around. What will emerge, is those peace loving NATO few, who had themselves built underground cities to wait out the radiation. (laughter in the background, coming from under my feet)

    Reply
  • April 24, 2016 at 4:09 pm
    Permalink

    How would we feel if the Russians had warships in the Gulf of Mexico? The same way the Russians feel about American warships in the Black Sea.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.