ISSN 2330-717X

Paraguay’s Haunting History – Analysis

By

By Trevor Cohen

A Haunting History: Authoritarianism in Paraguay

Many world leaders have described the recent impeachment of ex-President Fernando Lugo as a “constitutional coup.” Interestingly enough, this setback for democracy was one of the least authoritarian mishaps to befall Paraguay in its two hundred year history – the ouster reflects a hauntingly despotic past.

However, this historical legacy is anything but benign and it lives on in a central reality. According to a survey conducted by Latinobarómetro in 2010, 33 percent of Paraguayans agreed that “in certain circumstances an authoritarian government can be preferable to a democratic one.” Even more frightening, in 2001, 43 percent agreed with the same statement. By comparison, between 9 percent and 23 percent of people polled in other Latin American countries in 2010 said they would endorse a non-democratic, alternative form of governance under certain circumstances.

Paraguay
Paraguay

In his study of Paraguayan history, Harris Gaylord Warren observed: “authoritarianism was as deeply engrained among the people as the use of the Guarani language, and any effort to deviate from it entailed serious dangers.” Historically, when power changed hands, chaos ruled.

Thus, in order to understand Paraguayan politics today, one must travel back to where the narrative began: the nation’s inception.

Dr. Francia, the Supreme

Within three years of attaining independence in 1811, Dr. Jose Gaspar Rodriguez de Francia rose to political supremacy within Paraguay. The most educated man in the least educated South American republic, Dr. Francia rose to fame while defending Paraguay’s impoverished masses, cultivating a large following among the majority of the population in the process. This popularity made him vastly more powerful than any member of the landed elite. This victory was the only major step that reluctantly welcomed him to the top leadership position in the newly formed government.

While a member of the aristocracy himself, Francia despised the Creole elite and set out to systematically eliminate them from power in Paraguay. Finding a motive in an unearthed conspiracy against, Francia imprisoned most of the wealthy landowners for the duration of their lives, quite literally burying many alive in underground dungeons.

Part Colonel Kurtz, part Kim-il Sung, and part Robin Hood, Francia placed the estates of the incarcerated landholders under state control, using them to produced food for a new Paraguay. Meanwhile, he all but cut off the nation from trade and entrance to foreigners, and only the odd botanist or explorer who did happen to enter Paraguay was forced to stay for as long as 14 years under Francia’s watchful eye. However, among the peasants, who called him Carai Guazú, Dr. Francia was a savior. Campesinos enjoyed participation as ministers in his administration and their standard of living improved through the cultivation of land leased to them by their leader. With no elite present to persuade the masses against him, Francia maintained a monopoly on political power. His control over Paraguay was total, and he presided over nearly every aspect of the administration until his death in 1840.

The Builder and the Destroyer

While Francia left no heir apparent nor arranged for any transfer of power upon his death, those who succeeded him built upon his foundation, continuing the legacy of absolutism, which he personified. Carlos Antonio Lopez, the first leader following Francia, became known as “the Builder” for his efforts to modernize and industrialize the nation. He built schools, made magnificent renovations to the capital, and, in 1861, oversaw the completion of one of the first functioning railroads in South America. Antonio Lopez also reversed Francia’s policy of isolationism, and opened the nation up to foreigners. Notably, he welcomed foreign engineers to help design factories, boosting local production of high cost, value added products. This, while the elites of other Latin American countries opened their nations to often disastrous trade agreements with European powers. Such agreements enriched the coffers of the Latin American elite who controlled the ports, but they also saddled their nations with gaping trade deficits.

However, Paraguay’s atypical success – albeit achieved under a despotic ruler – did not last long. Dubbed the failed “Napoleon of South America,” Francisco Solano Lopez would destroy his father’s work. Having been sent to train in European military academies by his father, Solano Lopez was determined to expand landlocked Paraguay’s domain to the Atlantic. He envisioned an empire that included parts of Argentina, Brazil, and all of Uruguay.

After mobilizing an army of 80,000 by 1865, Lopez declared war on Brazil and Argentina in rapid succession, bent on satisfying his territorial ambitions. This lead Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay to form and alliance against Paraguay. The war quickly devolved into a protracted struggle for Paraguayan survival, which ended in genocide by 1870. Paraguay was destroyed by the ambition of a misguided leader; by the war’s end, 90% of the adult male population had been killed.

Aftermath: Anarchy and the Authoritarian Republic

After a period of occupation by Brazilian forces, Paraguay regained independent governance in 1878. Unfortunately, this left the country in the hands of green political who knew nothing but despotism. Thus, the two political parties that emerged – the Colorado Party and the Liberal Party – brought little change from previous eras. The Colorados, largely the remaining supporters of Lopez, dominated Paraguayan politics from 1878 to 1904, while the Liberals, born of an oligarchic coalition, were handed control from 1904 to 1936.

A republic in name only, as Warren pointed out, “the entire [Paraguayan] electoral process from registration of voters to recording the voice of votes was permeated with fraud.” Administrative transition was accomplished only through civil war or military coup, the last of which toppled the Liberal government in 1936. The following decades featured a series of interim governments, interspersed with more coups.

The Stroessner Dictatorship and Modern Democracy

In 1954, Alfredo Stroessner seized the presidency. Stroessner returned Paraguay to its post-independence history of one-man rule, though without a commitment to improving the lives of the peasantry. His regime favored the Colorado Party, relegating their Liberal Party rivals to the status of political pariahs, all the while reserving access to economic and political power to an elite cadre composed of his supporters and family members.

In 1989, a coup ousted Stroessner after 35 years of uncontested authority. Leading Paraguay into the new era of democracy was the Colorado Party, which retained the presidency in successive elections through a well-oiled patronage system established during the dictatorship.

Paraguay’s first turnover election came in 2008, with the triumph of ex-Bishop Fernando Lugo at the head of the Alliance for Progress: a loose coalition of left-leaning factions. Less than four years later, Lugo was swept from his office by a hurried impeachment. Unfortunately, true Paraguayan democracy existed for little less than three years before the politics of an authoritarian past terminated its sadly short life.

Trevor Cohen, Senior Research Fellow at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

This is an amended version of an article soon to be published by Fair Observer as part of an ongoing series on Lugo’s Impeachment and Paraguayan Democracy.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

COHA

COHA, or Council on Hemispheric Affairs, was founded in 1975, the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA), a nonprofit, tax-exempt independent research and information organization, was established to promote the common interests of the hemisphere, raise the visibility of regional affairs and increase the importance of the inter-American relationship, as well as encourage the formulation of rational and constructive U.S. policies towards Latin America.

One thought on “Paraguay’s Haunting History – Analysis

  • July 25, 2012 at 1:56 am
    Permalink

    Lugo was removed due to his incompetence, he did not get to the presidency by himself, he did because of the Alliance for Progress to whom he betrayed, by choosing way too many from the opposition to fill his cabinet. But the main problem for most of us was that he was short selling the country to Chavez and their bolivarianos. They came here with a new agenda to which most of the people are not willing to follow suit, beside giving too much importance to the Left, Lugo had 192 trips outside of the country, most of them without a real result for the country. Don’t forget that he was a priest for the Catholic church, and being that he fathered too many kids, at least one of them was with under age girl. From the inner circle some said that he was a priest only to get higher education but his ultimate goal and ambition was politics, thus he lied, and lied, but he did not have enough nerves to control himself, being in line with Chavez, his next step was to remain in power, who knows with what method i.e. he put a show in place there with the killings in Curuguaty. As a paraguayan I rather believe in the constitutional change we had rather than the direction to the Laps of Chavez, Lugo was taking the country. The left, Cuba, Chavez, and Iran in extention isn’t what we want. We believe in democracy, the mics are open, they paint the walls on the streets with graphities that the productive people don’t buy. We believe in our self determination, our freedom of choice, and individualism. We are a rich country that for too long has been blocked and boycotted and the boots of Argentina and Brazil held us down, our produce rotten at the border. And we are still here proud and stronger than before. I invite anyone to visit and explore this beautiful and peaceful land.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.