ISSN 2330-717X

The Folly Of Isolating Russia – OpEd

By

As Americans ingest the constant feed of dire reports and heartbreaking photographs from the war in Ukraine, it behooves us to look at Europe’s views of a European conflict.  First, these views are far from harmonious; there is, as the English Russia scholar Richard Sakwa has said, “no strategic European Union vision” on Ukraine—most members have merely been “shamed” into upping the ante in the supply of arms.  Second, in general, Europe is divided between east and west: the new Scholz government in Berlin sputters to create a coherent set of policies, and in France, President Emanuel Macron won reelection despite criticism for his willingness to engage President Putin deep into the night before the invasion.  In the newly extra-EU United Kingdom, Prime Minister Johnson is accused in some quarters of a kind of vicarious “Wag the Dog” scenario, in which trumpeting support for Kiev may obscure some unseemly activities at home [the most recent cover of the irreverent UK magazine, Private Eye, shows Johnson shaking hands with president Zelensky, with each saying simultaneously “Thank you for coming to my rescue”.]  In the continent’s east, the Poles and Romanians have been more hawkish, the newly reelected Orban in Hungary a persistent outlier.

Advertisement

In the April 23-24 edition of the Financial Times there appeared an opinion piece by Ivan Krastev, chair of the Center for Liberal Strategies in Sofia, Bulgaria, and a fellow at both the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna and the European Council on Foreign Relations.   It is a thoughtful essay, titled “To isolate Russia is not in the west’s power or interest.”  To support this, Krastev advances four reasons:

To isolate Russia “unconsciously adopts a discourse in which Russia as a civilization is immutable.”  As 1991 showed, this is hardly so.

Isolation “closes off interest in what is happening in Russia”: there are protests against the war, albeit small in comparison with widespread public support [as a footnote to this, polling shows that the relentless tranches of U.S.-led sanctions serve to rally public opinion behind the Kremlin, and to create a “siege mentality”.]

Perhaps most important in the long run, Krastev predicts that “to bet on a world without Russia is ultimately futile, because the non-western world, which may not favor the Kremlin’s war is hardly eager to isolate Russia” [enter China, India, Brazil, South Africa and much of the African continent.]

Krastev stumbles at the last fence, however, with the fourth reason for eschewing isolation: “[It] justifies Putin’s twisted narrative that the only Russia the west can tolerate is a weak or defeated one”.

Advertisement

I would submit that this “narrative”, far from twisted, is in fact clear, linear, and supported by post-Cold War history.  When was the west—most especially the United States, which despite all is of the most paramount importance to Russia—most “tolerant”, comfortable toward Russia?  The answer, of course, is the disastrous decade of the 1990s when a largely compliant Russia welcomed the west’s alchemical application of economic “reform”; when NATO was expanded over Russia’s feeble and futile protests; when NATO attacked its key ally Serbia—contrary to the UN charter; when the United States ripped up the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty; when President Bill Clinton’s contempt for the increasingly tragicomic Boris Yeltsin could hardly be contained—his comment, reported by Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, says it all: “Yeltsin drunk is better than most of the alternatives sober.”

Putin, of course, is a different proposition for the west and—like it or not—for Russia: and had we been ready to deal seriously with a country reemerging from the ashes of the 90; to acknowledge that Russia, just like the United States, has legitimate strategic security interests in its extended neighborhood [should Russia create a Monroe Doctrine for our consideration?]; and that a Ukraine in NATO is, as even most expert observers not onside with Russia have agreed, a non-starter—we might have averted the growing prospect of a prolonged stalemate in the war in Ukraine, or, worse yet, a full-blown proxy war between Russia and NATO with potentially apocalyptic results.

It is for all those reasons that while I publicly and unequivocally condemn Russia’s invasion, nonetheless points out opportunities missed along the way.  To these we should not add, as Ivan Krastev advises, permanent isolation of Russia.

*David C. Speedie is an ACURA board member and was Senior Fellow and Director of the Program on U.S. Global Engagement at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York from 2007 to 2017.

5 thoughts on “The Folly Of Isolating Russia – OpEd

  • April 29, 2022 at 2:40 am
    Permalink

    Russia has a smaller economy than the usa state of Texas. So the premise that Russia has legitimate security interests in its neighbourhood, is laughable.
    It’s not what Russia states that is important, it’s what Russia actually does, that matters, and shows its true intention.
    Let’s look at what Russia has done, invaded Grozny, invaded Georgia, invaded Moldova, invaded Crimea, with troops with no epaulettes, invaded East ukraine in 2014, invaded ukraine proper in 2022.
    Russia is number 136 in the global corruption index, so the country has the ranking of a mafia government.
    The writer falsely refers to opportunities missed, yet Russia has falsely claimed Russian speakers are ill treated in most of the territories it has invaded. The RUSSIANS have yet to find the imaginary neo nazis in Ukraine , despite Russian tanks having a half swastika on their Russian vehicles!

    Reply
    • April 29, 2022 at 4:29 pm
      Permalink

      You need to start seeing yourself most of the world by population does. Check in with John Mearsheimer’s take on the situation. Johnson’s Russia List and ACURA subscription highly recommended. Your media is, quite literally, unbelievable.

      Reply
  • April 29, 2022 at 3:09 am
    Permalink

    Advice ‘a day late and a dollar short’. Since America and its allies ‘won’ the Cold War in 1991 the West has been on an unhinged triumphalism binge, and just as any common drunkard, America and its allies haven’t the intelligence, awareness or desire to contemplate the bad fruits of their bender.

    You can’t reason with a drunkard, though Russia and many others have tried over the past 3 decades. The U.S. has been on an unholy ‘tear’, drunk with power as “the only superpower left”, alienating one key nation after another with it’s holier-than-thou sanctions regime, regime-change tactics and outright military warfare. Drunkards do suffer from delusions of grandeur.

    The current cadre of Western leaders’ short-sighted chest beating against Russia and any other power that refuses to bow is exceeded only by their collective ineptitude – they haven’t a single genuine strategic thought among them. Have you ever watched baboons in a zoo when one starts to shriek and beat his chest, how one-by-one all the other baboons mindlessly join in the melee? There you have the perfect analogy for today’s Western leaders.

    Such ones are working overtime plotting their own downfall, all the while imagining in all their bungling arrogance that they are succeeding against their rivals. Russia, China and their partners see clearly the outcome, and will do significant things to hasten it along.

    The New World Order that is bringing to birth won’t be much fun for freedom-loving persons like myself, but history will unforgivingly condemn Western leaders for massively squandering their post-Cold War inheritance to pave the way for the ascendancy of brutal authoritarianism which they themselves recklessly ushered to the fore by virtue of their stubborn insistence on having their way all around the globe.

    Reply
    • April 30, 2022 at 8:29 pm
      Permalink

      Wow, a US media publication with thinking people and differentiated commentary.. I am positively baffled..

      Reply
  • April 29, 2022 at 12:19 pm
    Permalink

    speedster you are a nincompoop whose brain is washed away. Can’t you see US along with other signatories of the Transatlantic Military Alliance has killed more than 10 million people around the globe post 1991? Author is quite right. US shamelessly deceived Russia of not extending jurisdiction by an INCH well beyond United Germany! And what we see today is obnoxiousness. Let’s allow China or Russia form a military alliance with Mexico or Cuba and deploy offensive weapons against the US and start touting to US , “ og don’t worry, these are all legal obligations of the alliance, and you needn’t worry as weapons are all for defensive purposes “. Will US accept this ???

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.