Unmanned Aerial Vehicles And Escalation Along LoC – OpEd


The intensity and frequency of unprovoked shelling across Line of Control (LoC) by Indian occupying forces targeting civilian population in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) has increased under the Bharatiya Janata Party driven by extremist Hinduta ideology.

Since January 1949, India continues to blatantly refuse the mandate and functions of United Nations Military Observers Group in Indian and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) that was created to monitor ceasefire violations on both sides of LoC.

On May 25, Indian troops fired on the vehicles carrying UNMOGIP observers on Pakistani side LoC in Khanjar sector. Despite the fact that the vehicle carrying observers had the blue UN flag hoisted on it for clear identification, the firing incident shows that it was deliberate action on part of Indian troops to target the UN observers. The purposes of such deliberate firing can be none other but to stop UNMOGIP observers from collecting evidence of ceasefire violations by Indian forces.

The LoC Disputed Territory: Shown in green is Kashmiri region under Pakistani control. The orange-brown region represents Indian-controlled Jammu and Kashmir while the Aksai Chin is under Chinese control. Credit: CIA World Factbook.
The LoC Disputed Territory: Shown in green is Kashmiri region under Pakistani control. The orange-brown region represents Indian-controlled Jammu and Kashmir while the Aksai Chin is under Chinese control. Credit: CIA World Factbook.

Realpolitik in the 21st Century at a tactical level bears a profound shift where states are looking for alignment of interests, instead of alliances. Balancing China at least in military domain brought convergence of interests between India and the US. In 2005, India and the US signed a ten-year defense framework in which they committed to increasing defense trade, the transfer of technology, and counterterrorism collaboration. Barack Obama realized the waning influence of the country around the world and presented the “Pivot to Asia” strategy that was later renamed as “Rebalance to Asia” for reasserting the US leadership role around the world, especially Asia. This strategy viewed India as natural partner in South Asia. India seized the opportunity to align with the US for exploiting the ‘China threat’ to build its military muscle.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s military modernization project aims to spend $250 billion by 2025 to develop a kill factor. Such a plan will further put pressure on Pakistan to adequately enhance defense spending to counter conventional threats to its security.

In June 2016, under the Obama administration India requested the US to supply 22 General Atomics Guardian drones. These drones are primarily used for surveillance purposes, but can be armed with air-to-ground missiles as well. A major hurdle for India acquiring both armed and surveillance UAVs from the US after joining the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) on June 27, 2016 with the US support was removed. With the signing of Logistics Support Agreement (LSA), Communications Interoperability and Security Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA) and Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-spatial Cooperation (BECA) with the US, India has renewed its push for acquiring combat Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).

For increasing pressure, the US Senate India Caucus co-chairs Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) and Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) have written letters to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis for the early approval of 22 General Atomics Guardian drones for India. India is also in a consultative process for buying 100 armed Avengers UAVs from the US. Avengers drones armed with Hellfire anti-tank missiles can strike targets eight kilometers distant. The delivery of 10 Israel manufactured Heron TP-armed drones is due this year. Dual-use Heron drones can be used both for reconnaissance and air-to-ground missiles.

The induction of advanced surveillance and combat UAVs along the LoC by India will be highly destabilizing. India has claimed to carry surgical strike in the aftermath of Uri attack, a claim vehemently denied by Pakistan due to absence of any evidence of such strike. Armed UAVs will provide India the capability to strike targets within Azad Jammu and Kashmir without risking the lives of its ground soldiers and air force pilots.

Under these circumstances, Pakistan will be forced to respond in kind and the situation will escalate due to Indian aggressive actions along the LoC. Recently Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart, the head of US Defense Intelligence Agency in testimony to US Senate Armed Services Committee has shown serious concerns about India launching aggressive actions inside Pakistan on the pretext of stopping cross-border attacks.

The US, Israel or any other state supplying UAVs, especially armed UAVs, to India must play a responsible role for keeping tensions under control along the LoC. Such UAVs deliveries should only proceed after written guarantees from India that these UAVs will not be used along the LoC. The US as a world leader must consider the dangerous implications of these UAVs on peace along the LoC. The world leader must not forget that keeping India and Pakistan away from armed conflict is in the best interest of international community.

*The author works as Research Associate with Strategic Vision Institute (SVI), Islamabad, Pakistan

One thought on “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles And Escalation Along LoC – OpEd

  • May 30, 2017 at 12:25 pm

    Pakistani’s have been so adept at pulling wool over everyone’s eyes, that they have begun fooling themselves about this as well. The news about India firing at UN personnel is false – a fact that was ascertained by the UN in Pakistan itself.

    Pakistan has trouble on 3 out of its 4 international borders – Iran, Afghanistan and India, but every single narrative out of Pakistan paints Pakistan as the country being wronged in the region. For a very long period India has tried pointing out the perils of arming Pakistan which has been nothing but a pain in South Asia.

    India has its flaws and a number of them, but with regards to Pakistan, every single PM in India has begun his/her Tenure with an outreach to Pakistan to fix relations, the present PM Modi included.

    The fact remains that Pakistan’s army has no meaning without an enemy, and a kaffir enemy is better than an Islamic one. Painting India as the enemy serves to portray Pakistan’s army as the “Defender of the faith”.

    People inside Pakistan and a few gullible ones outside fall for this story easily. A study of history shows that every single war has been provoked by Pakistan. Unless there is an objective study of history within Pakistan and the people of Pakistan wrest control of foreign policy from the Pakistani Army, this explosive situation is here to stay.

    India will expend more and more in her defence (notice the words here … defence not offensive capability) to counter the threat of terrorism across the border. This threat of terrorism is not just exported to India, but to Afghanistan and now to Iran with the dream of some “getting strategic depth” in that country.

    The Mandarins at Rawalpindi and the terrorists in Pakistan are sorely mistaken if they think that India will just up and walk out of Kashmir handing it to Pakistan. Kashmir is part of India and India’s secularism is not negotiable.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *