ISSN 2330-717X

Kremlin Success With Political Technology Obscures Growth Of Opposition – OpEd

By

The Kremlin’s success in using political technology against its opponents has obscured just how rapidly opposition to the Putin regime has grown not only from the population at large and many analysts but from the senior people in the regime itself, according to the editors of Nezavisimaya gazeta.

The Kremlin assumes and many others do as well that political technology can be equally effective for a long time to come, keeping political opponents off the ballot or defeating them if they nonetheless succeed in gaining a place on the ballot; but that assumption is misplaced, they say in a lead article (ng.ru/editorial/2019-03-26/2_7540_red.html).

Instead, the editors argue, the very success the regime has had with political technology has had two consequences both of which are extremely dangerous. On the one hand, it has convinced the regime that it doesn’t have to engage in real politics, offering proposals that will win support, because it can remain in power without doing so.

And on the other, the success the regime’s political technological approach has had in keeping opponents off balance and out of office has concealed from almost everyone just how much anger there is at the regime and its policies. That in turn means that when the opposition does emerge, it may do so in profoundly extra-systemic, even revolutionary ways.

Both the federal center and its regional representatives continue to be that political technology will be sufficient to keep them in power more or less forever, the Moscow paper says. But in fact, this use of political technology as a substitute for real politics only puts off the day of reckoning and makes an explosion more rather than less likely.

And that in turn means, the editors say, that the Kremlin may not be able to sense “that moment when protest voting is transformed into a revolt and by so doing blocks the mechanism of the legitimation of the powers that be via elections.”  They add that everything points in that direction now.

Paul Goble

Paul Goble

Paul Goble is a longtime specialist on ethnic and religious questions in Eurasia. Most recently, he was director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy. Earlier, he served as vice dean for the social sciences and humanities at Audentes University in Tallinn and a senior research associate at the EuroCollege of the University of Tartu in Estonia. He has served in various capacities in the U.S. State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the International Broadcasting Bureau as well as at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Goble maintains the Window on Eurasia blog and can be contacted directly at [email protected] .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.