Why Brazil Should Shun The Israeli Model – OpEd

Newly inaugurated Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro is set to be the arch-enemy of the environment and of indigenous and disadvantaged communities in his country. He also promises to be a friend of like-minded far-right leaders the world over.

It is, therefore, not surprising to see a special kind of friendship blossoming between Bolsonaro and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “We need good brothers like Netanyahu,” Bolsonaro said after receiving him ahead of his inauguration in Brasilia on Jan. 1. Bolsonaro is a “great ally (and) a brother,” the Israeli PM replied.

But, while Bolsonaro sees in Netanyahu a role model — for reasons that should worry many Brazilians — the country certainly does not need “brothers” like the Israeli leader.

Netanyahu’s militancy, oppression of the indigenous Palestinian people, his racially motivated targeting of black African immigrants and his persistent violations of international law are not at all what a country like Brazil needs to escape corruption, bring about communal harmony and usher in an era of regional integration and economic prosperity.

Netanyahu, of course, was keen on attending Bolsonaro’s inauguration, which is likely to go down in Brazilian history as an infamous day, where democracy and human rights came under their most serious threat since the nation launched its democratic transition in the early 1980s.

In recent years, Brazil has emerged as a sensible regional power that defended Palestinian human rights and championed the integration of the “State of Palestine” into the larger international community. Frustrated by Brazil’s record on Palestine and Israel, Netanyahu, a shrewd politician, saw an opportunity in the populist discourse parroted by Bolsonaro during his campaign.

The new Brazilian president wants to reverse Brazil’s foreign policy on Palestine and Israel, the same way he wants to reverse all the policies of his predecessors regarding indigenous rights and the protection of the rainforest, among other pressing matters.

What is truly worrying is that Bolsonaro, who has been likened to Donald Trump — not least because of his vow to “make Brazil great again” — is likely to keep his promises. Indeed, only hours after his inauguration, he issued an executive order targeting land rights of indigenous peoples in Brazil, to the delight of the agricultural lobbies, which are eager to cut down much of the country’s forests.

Confiscating indigenous peoples’ territories, as Bolsonaro plans to do, is something that Netanyahu, his government and their predecessors have done without remorse for many years. Yes, it is clear that the claim of “brotherhood” is based on very solid ground.

But there are other dimensions to the love affair between the two leaders. Much work has been invested in turning Brazil from having an arguably pro-Palestinian government to a Trump-like foreign policy.

In his campaign, Bolsonaro reached out to conservative political groups, the never truly tamed military and Evangelical churches, all with powerful lobbies, sinister agendas and unmistakable influence. Such groups have historically, not only in South America, but in the US and other countries too, conditioned their political support for any candidate on the unconditional and blind support of Israel. This is how the US has become the main benefactor for Israel, and is precisely how Tel Aviv aims to conquer new political grounds.

The Western world, in particular, is turning toward far-right demagogues for simple answers to complicated and convoluted problems. Brazil, thanks to Bolsonaro and his supporters, is now joining this disturbing trend.

Israel is unabashedly exploiting the unmitigated rise of global neo-fascism and populism. Worse, these trends, once perceived to be anti-Semitic, are now wholly embraced by Tel Aviv, which is seeking to broaden its political influence and also its weapons market.

Politically, far-right parties understand that, in order for Israel to help them whitewash their past and present sins, they would have to submit completely to Israel’s agenda in the Middle East. And that is precisely what is taking place from Washington to Rome, Budapest to Vienna and, as of late, Brasilia.

But another, perhaps more compelling reason, is money. Israel has much to offer by way of its destructive war and “security” technology — a massive product line that has been used with lethal consequences against Palestinians.

The border control industry is thriving in the US and Europe. In both cases, Israel is the successful role model and the technology supplier. Israeli technology, thanks to the newfound sympathy for its alleged security problems, is now invading European borders.

According to Ynetnews, Israel is the seventh-largest arms exporter in the world and is emerging as a leader in the global export of drones. Europe’s excitement for Israel’s drone technology is related to mostly unfounded fears of migrants and refugees. In the case of Brazil, Israeli drones will be used in the fight against criminal gangs and for other internal reasons. For the record, Israeli drones manufactured by Elbit Systems were purchased and used by the former Brazilian government just before the FIFA World Cup in 2014.

What makes future deals between Brazil and Israel more alarming is the sudden affinity of far-right politicians in both countries. Expectedly, Bolsonaro and Netanyahu discussed the drones at length during the latter’s visit.

Israel has used extreme violence to counter Palestinian demands for human rights, including lethal violence against ongoing peaceful protests at the fence separating besieged Gaza from Israel. If Bolsonaro thinks that he will successfully counter local crimes through unhinged violence — as opposed to addressing social and economic inequality and the unfair distribution of wealth in his country — then he can only expect to exasperate an already horrific death toll.

Israeli security obsessions should not be duplicated, neither in Brazil nor anywhere else, and Brazilians, many of whom rightly worry about the state of democracy in their country, should not succumb to the Israeli militant mindset that has wrought no peace but much violence.

Israel exports wars to its neighbors, and war technology to the rest of the world. As many countries are plagued by conflict, often resulting from massive income inequalities, Israel should not be seen as the model to follow, but rather the example to avoid.