ISSN 2330-717X

Reflections On Brexit Vote: Triumph Of Irrationality – OpEd

By

The Brexit vote in the UK is yet another reminder of the perils of direct democracy in today’s complex “post-industrial” age putting severe limits on the ability of average citizens to make informed choices about complicated economic and socio-political issues. But, thankfully, the British political system is based on representative democracy, which is why the legally non-binding referendum ought to be ignored by the British lawmakers, most of whom are in favor of remaining in the Union — for good reasons.

Faced with the problems of economic stagnation, terrorism, refugees, the deepening right/left cleavage, and so on, the European Union is facing uncertain future and maybe headed toward a bigger crisis of governability in case the Brexit vote translates into Britain’s actual departure from the Union, which in all likelihood would trigger a break-up of the British Union; Scotland Wales have opted to remain in EU and now there are calls for a fresh Scottish referendum on independence. Equally important, the Brexit vote has raised new concerns about the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland and the peace between them, which has been much helped by their EU membership. Neither economically nor in terms of their security, the British people are not served by the Brexit campaign, which has prophesied disaster of biblical proportion with the myth of an EU super-state and marauding masses of immigrants.

Concerning the latter, UK admits some 360,000 immigrants annually, many of them due to brain drain from the South, which is not a terribly huge number that can be negotiated down within the EU context, e.g., by a so-called new Luxembourg Compromise emulating the past concessions to France. Some minor revisions of the EU Treaty to accommodate UK might be necessary in order to stem the anti-EU tide in the island country that has much benefited, e.g., in terms of its environmental laws, from EU membership.

On a broader level, the Brexit vote represents a backlash against globalization and its side-effects in terms of (national) identity. The anti-EU right-wing politicians who exploit the refugee and immigration issues to the advantage of their identitarian politics of exclusion often conveniently ignore the plus sides of immigration, seeing how Germany’s labor shortage problems are somewhat remedied by the huge influx of fresh labor from Syria and elsewhere.

Not only that, the European far-right in particular is completely wedded to a sinister myth of a centralized EU depriving member states of their sovereignty, when in fact it is abundantly clear that the EU is not moving toward a “single state” and is fully governed by the “union method” of coordinated action by the national governments. In other words, there are structural limits on European integration, ignored by the far-right populists who demonize the EU and scapegoat it for problems that are national in character, such as uneven growth or stagnation.

On the other hand, the Brexit turmoil in UK is aided by the monumental miscalculations of Prime Minister David Cameron, who capitulated to the extremists in his own party and has now doomed his country to a disastrous course that, logically speaking, ought to be frozen and reversed in the House of Commons. Britain is too crucial a part of the continent to depart from the European Union, which would be exposed to potential German hegemony if indeed the exit vote culminates in an actual EU exit. Hopefully, the British people can learn from the major shocks of the referendum’s divisive results and can swing back to rationality, for there is only one word to describe the result, that is, the triumph of irrationality.


Enjoy the article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


Kaveh L. Afrasiabi

Kaveh L. Afrasiabi

Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, Ph.D. is an Iranian-American political scientist and author specializing in Iran’s foreign and nuclear affairs, and author of several books.

One thought on “Reflections On Brexit Vote: Triumph Of Irrationality – OpEd

  • June 27, 2016 at 12:06 pm
    Permalink

    I am amazed by the author statement of the triumph of irrationality. Does the author think that British imperial system was rational before the referendum? PM Blair in just few hours decided to invade and occupy Iraq for fake reasons. The British contributed significantly in the killing of 1.5 million of innocent Iraqis. How about their support for the fascist government in Ukraine? They, along with the USA, destroyed the legitimate government there, and have created significant hostility with Russia, which may end up in a very bad outcome. How about sending troops again to destabilize Syria and their support to terrorist organizations against the legal Syrian government there. How about their fake economic model that has privatized all productive sectors to be owned by foreign German investors? How about Mr. Cameron’s picture with the dead pig. For the author information, the entire imperialist system is irrational. This is because it lives on global looting of resources and domestic looting of social programs’ funds. Imperialism is in deep crisis because it has sucked world resources for the few financiers. Finally, it is best for Scotland and others to be independent. Let these people determine their life. It is good for Britain to be divided into smaller countries as they divided the Arab land into small powerless countries.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CLOSE
CLOSE