ISSN 2330-717X

Conflict Over Crimea Between Two Peoples, Not Just Two States – OpEd

By

When the history of the 21st century is written, Vitaly Portnikov says, Russia’s occupation of Crimea “beyond any doubt will be among the most important,” not because of the Ukrainian peninsula itself but because of two other factors that seldom get the attention now they will in the future.

According to the Ukrainian commentator, Crimea is sacred ground for only one people, the Crimean Tatars. “For Ukraine, it is a symbol of territory torn away from it; for Russia, it is a demonstration of the right of force and its own ability to act without punishment” (obozrevatel.com/politics/2364-russkie-i-ukraintsyi-chuzhie-narodyi.htm)

The first thing historians will take note of in the case of the Crimean Anschluss is this, Portnikov says. “Never in the 21st century before Crimea and not in the last decades of the 20th did any state dare to annex the territory of another.”  Russia did and undermined international law as such.

Whether Russia succeeded in destroying this law altogether and thus return the world to the law of the jungle will depend on whether the international community is able to hold Russian accountable and force Moscow to withdraw and return Crimea to Ukraine, the commentator continues

But the second result of Russia’s Anschluss is likely to be almost as important. The annexation of Crimea was “not simply the beginning of ‘a hybrid war’ between Russia and Ukraine but a conflict of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples. This is a real civilizational shift in the history of the Russian people itself and its empire.

The Russian state became an empire and not simply a remnant of the Golden Horde, precisely after it joined the Ukrainian lands to it, Portnikov argues.  Indeed, “the ideology of empire, its apparatus, its new church after the Nikonian reforms, and its economy were the result of the inclusion of Ukrainian lands and the cooperation of Russians and Ukrainians.”

By invading, occupying and annexing Crimea, Putin has destroyed that basis for empire. But he has done more than that. Just as the defeat of Russia in the Crimean War 160 years ago allowed Italy to unite and join the concert of European powers, so now, Russia’s self-defeating actions in Crimea and elsewhere in Ukraine are helping Ukrainians to achieve the same.

Five years ago, Putin was able to achieve this. If on February 28, 2014, it was almost impossible to imagine that Russian and Ukrainian soldiers would be shooting at one another, “today this is something quite ordinary, a part of our lives,” Portnikov says.

And while it is true that there are not a few people in Russia who still love Ukraine and “not a few in Ukraine who love Russia, some the Russia of Putin and others the Russia of Herzen, Sakharov and Nemtsov, this does not mean that the following simple fact is not true,” Portnikov says

“Five years ago, Russia and Ukraine became hostile states.” But more than that, the Ukrainian commentator says, Russians and Ukrainians became hostile peoples, each viewing the other as alien.  That changes the course of history not just in Eastern Europe but more broadly and is a shift that even now everyone must acknowledge and take into account.

Because whatever happens to Crimea and one very much hopes Russia will be forced to return it lest international law be left in tatters, this change in the attitude of Russians and Ukrainians toward one another is not going to be reversed, even if eventually the two countries can live in peace as neighbors.

Please Donate Today


Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


Paul Goble

Paul Goble

Paul Goble is a longtime specialist on ethnic and religious questions in Eurasia. Most recently, he was director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy. Earlier, he served as vice dean for the social sciences and humanities at Audentes University in Tallinn and a senior research associate at the EuroCollege of the University of Tartu in Estonia. He has served in various capacities in the U.S. State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the International Broadcasting Bureau as well as at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Goble maintains the Window on Eurasia blog and can be contacted directly at [email protected] .

3 thoughts on “Conflict Over Crimea Between Two Peoples, Not Just Two States – OpEd

  • Avatar
    March 2, 2019 at 12:31 pm
    Permalink

    Saying that Crimea is sacred ground for Tatars is like saying New York is sacred ground for the Iroquois Indians. Nonsense . Tatars are a mere fraction of the population in Crimea. The west wanted the Crimea to have Sevastopol as a naval base. Did not happen and will not happen. 97% of the Crimean’s want to be with Russia ,not with the junta the U.S. established in 2014.

    Reply
    • Avatar
      March 2, 2019 at 6:21 pm
      Permalink

      Oh, it isn’t just that. It’s all echoes of the “Voice of America” and “Radio Free Europe”. I do wonder about the motives behind these globalist think tank(er)s and their rationale for constantly and vociferously bashing Russia. And on what basis? A handful of mythical Crimean Tatars? Funny that.

      Reply
  • Misha
    March 4, 2019 at 9:37 am
    Permalink

    With his bias in mind, Mr. Goble conveniently overlooks the reality that most of Crimea’s ethnic Ukrainians favor their region’s reunification with Russia.

    To a good extent, the Crimean Tatars aren’t analogous to the Indians, who centuries ago had settled into the Western Hemisphere.

    It’s propagandistic crock to liken Crimea’s reunification with Russia with the Anschluss of 1938. Russia isn’t Nazi Germany, with the Nazis annexing Austria before that country was to have a referendum on the matter.

    Relative to Crimea, the situations in Kosovo and northern Cyprus serve as better comparative examples. The muting of this aspect is in line with the hypocritical anti-Russian propaganda out there.

    Crimea might still be part of Ukraine, were it not for the foolhardy coup against Ukraine’s democratically elected president, which saw enhanced anti-Russian activity.

    Related:

    https://www.academia.edu/37358188/Michael_Averko_Consistency_and_Reality_Lacking_on_Crimea

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/twisted-history-against-russia-and-serbia/5390154

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.