Walking A Tightrope: The Perilous Path To Normalization Between Japan And North Korea – OpEd


In the realm of Northeast Asian politics, the prospect of a meeting between the Prime Minister of Japan and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un represents a pivotal moment with the potential to reshape regional dynamics. The primary obstacle to this historic meeting lies in the long-standing issue of Japanese nationals abducted by North Korea, a deeply emotional and political issue for Japan. This analysis seeks to explore the multifaceted dimensions of the bilateral relationship, the implications of a potential meeting on regional tensions, and perspectives from relevant global stakeholders including South Korea, the United States, Russia, and China. Through examining these aspects, this paper aims to propose solutions to overcome obstacles to the meeting and offer a conclusion on the future direction of Japan-North Korea relations.

The bilateral relationship between Japan and North Korea is marred by deep-seated historical tensions and ongoing disputes, notably highlighted by the unresolved abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korean agents during the 1970s and 1980s. These abductions have left a lasting scar on Japan, with the lack of transparency and cooperation from North Korea on this issue hindering efforts to normalize relations between the two nations. The situation is further complicated by North Korea’s persistent nuclear ambitions and missile tests, which pose a direct and significant security threat to Japan. These actions by North Korea not only strain diplomatic relations but also raise serious concerns for Japan’s national security, contributing to a climate of distrust and apprehension. Despite attempts at diplomatic negotiations, the enduring lack of progress on these critical issues continues to obstruct the path to reconciliation and peace, leaving the bilateral relationship in a state of uncertainty and tension.

The potential for a meeting between the Japanese Prime Minister and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un presents a glimmer of hope for a breakthrough in the long-standing frosty relations between the two countries. This significant diplomatic engagement hinges on the critical issue of the abductions of Japanese citizens, with a satisfactory address of this matter being a prerequisite for any meaningful dialogue. Should this hurdle be overcome, the discussions could ambitiously broaden to encompass the topics of denuclearization and the establishment of peace treaties, aiming to alleviate the persistent tensions that have plagued the Korean Peninsula. Such a diplomatic endeavor would not only mark a pivotal shift towards de-escalation but also demonstrate a mutual commitment to adopting a more grounded and productive approach to bilateral relations. The implications of such a meeting are profound, potentially setting the stage for a new era of cooperation and understanding, thereby reshaping the geopolitical landscape of Northeast Asia.

The prospect of a meeting between the Japanese Prime Minister and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un draws significant interest from regional and global actors, each with its unique perspective and stakes in the outcome. South Korea, sharing the Korean Peninsula with the North, might approach such a development with cautious optimism. The potential for this dialogue to usher in an era of enhanced stability and peace is welcome, yet there’s an underlying concern regarding North Korea’s historical unpredictability and what this means for future inter-Korean relations. Across the Pacific, the United States would be keenly observing the proceedings, particularly discussions around denuclearization. While supportive of efforts that contribute to regional security, there would be apprehensions about any developments that could potentially weaken the U.S.-Japan security alliance or compromise American strategic interests in Asia.

Meanwhile, Russia and China, key players in the Northeast Asian security dynamics, would likely see the meeting in a positive light, especially if it leads to a de-escalation of tensions. China, as North Korea’s closest ally and economic support, would have a vested interest in any efforts that promise a more peaceful neighborhood. Similarly, Russia would likely view the diplomatic engagement as a chance to strengthen its influence and role in regional security affairs, leveraging the opportunity to assert itself as a mediator and stabilizer in the Korean Peninsula’s complex geopolitics.

To facilitate the meeting and address the abduction issue, Japan could seek a multilateral framework involving other affected countries and international organizations to apply pressure on North Korea. Additionally, offering economic incentives in exchange for concrete steps toward resolving the abductions and denuclearization could be a pragmatic approach. However, any agreement should be transparent, verifiable, and involve the international community to ensure compliance.

In conclusion, while significant obstacles remain, a meeting between the Prime Minister of Japan and President Kim Jong Un could pave the way for a new chapter in Japan-North Korea relations. By addressing historical issues, engaging in realistic diplomacy, and involving regional and global stakeholders, there is a potential pathway to not only improving bilateral relations but also contributing to stability and peace in the Korean Peninsula and beyond.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own.


  • Cha, Victor D. “The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future.” Harper, 2013.
  • Council on Foreign Relations. “U.S.-North Korea Relations.” Council on Foreign Relations, 10 Feb. 2021, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-north-korea-relations
  • Denney, Steven, and Peter Ward. “South Korea’s Approach to North Korea: The Role of Divided Families in South Korea’s Reconciliation and Engagement Policies.” The Asia-Pacific Journal, vol. 14, no. 10, 2016. 
  • Funabashi, Yoichi. “The Peninsula Question: A Chronicle of the Second Korean Nuclear Crisis.” Brookings Institution Press, 2007.
  • Hayes, Peter, and Moon Chung-in. “The Future of the Korean Peninsula: Korea 2032 and Beyond.” Asia Policy, no. 24, 2017, pp. 1–38, www.nbr.org/publication/the-future-of-the-korean-peninsula-korea-2032-and-beyond/
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. “Abductions of Japanese Citizens by North Korea.” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/n_korea/abduction/index.html
  • Snyder, Scott. “South Korea at the Crossroads: Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers.” Columbia University Press, 2018.
  • “The Six-Party Talks on North Korea’s Nuclear Program.” Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/six-party-talks-north-koreas-nuclear-program

Simon Hutagalung

Simon Hutagalung is a retired diplomat from the Indonesian Foreign Ministry and received his master's degree in political science and comparative politics from the City University of New York. The opinions expressed in his articles are his own.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *