ISSN 2330-717X

Trump’s Foreign Policy Is The Realism America Needs – OpEd


Despite Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s reality-show candidacy, his recent foreign-policy speech put forth a realistic view of the world and a largely credible foreign policy to face it.

Continuing his poke at the political establishment, the maverick candidate proposed a viable alternative to the bipartisan foreign-policy consensus, which uses unneeded and profligate military interventions overseas as the primary US foreign-policy tool.

As opposed to the interventionist neoconservatism of the Bush administration and the equally meddling liberal hawkishness of Hillary Clinton, Trump got back to basics in this week’s speech. He let American citizens know his foreign policy would safeguard US national interests first—not those of foreign countries, including providing for their security while they freeload.

He laudably said military intervention would be used only as a last resort, after diplomacy and economic sanctions—and even the latter would be used sparingly.

Rather than using military power in a vain attempt to export democracy by force into countries that are unreceptive to it, as the United States did in Iraq and Libya, Trump said America should promote its values through leading by example.

This is smart, practical policy.

Democracy takes root when people in a country support it, rather than having it shoved down their throats at gunpoint. In only four out of 18 attempts since 1900 has the forcible US export of democracy succeeded.

In contrast, at the end of the Cold War the United States inspired the countries of Eastern and Central Europe to democratize from their communist past.

Both the Bush and Obama administrations tried to impose democracy on other nations—Iraq and Libya, respectively—using military power and nation-building, and we are now stuck bandaging the resulting hemorrhages.

This interventionist approach sparked chaos in the Middle East and allowed the terror group ISIS to fill the vacuum.

Trump sees this reality and is right to commit his presidency to a more restrained, prudent approach to foreign intervention.

Echoing the traditional, less-interventionist US foreign policy that was the norm before the Cold War, Trump affirmed the United States would “not go in search of enemies.” This more restrained foreign policy served the nation well from its birth in the late 1700s to 1947, when it began to police the world.

During this period, the United States had few costly foreign wars—and in the ones that it did enter, such as World Wars I and II, the country had the luxury of doing so late, thus saving American lives and resources.

Trump’s promise of a nation that places more emphasis on diplomacy and improving relationships, even with nuclear-armed China and Russia, can make the world a safer place.

And it may result in cooperation in specific areas where US interests align with those of such countries—such as a common interest with Russia in combatting radical Islamist terrorism.

This week’s speech shows us Trump realizes a central problem in US foreign policy: Intervention in the affairs of other nations has been unnecessary and destructive.

While many scoff at his success at striking “deals,” his commitment to putting military might second to respectful negotiation and traditional diplomacy shows leadership.

The United States is not the world’s protector. Our own resources have been over- extended in providing for the defense of wealthy allies.

It’s time we start treating them as our peers, transferring the responsibility for their own security.

Despite Trump’s usual campaign bluster, his foreign-policy views are largely well-argued and based on knowledge of, and stark admission of, numerous past instances of excessive and failed military meddling overseas.

This article was published at and reprinted with permission.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

Ivan Eland

Ivan Eland is Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace & Liberty at The Independent Institute. Dr. Eland is a graduate of Iowa State University and received an M.B.A. in applied economics and Ph.D. in national security policy from George Washington University. He has been Director of Defense Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, and he spent 15 years working for Congress on national security issues, including stints as an investigator for the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Principal Defense Analyst at the Congressional Budget Office. He is author of the books Partitioning for Peace: An Exit Strategy for Iraq, and Recarving Rushmore.

2 thoughts on “Trump’s Foreign Policy Is The Realism America Needs – OpEd

  • May 3, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    Let us all hope that Trump gets elected. Then the neocons can be shoved out of Washington, D.C. We are lucky that Johnny insane McCain never got elected. And Hillary is a female war hawk.

  • May 3, 2016 at 4:06 pm

    The piece Eland is leaving out of the picture he’s describing here is the role played by the Mil/Industrial Complex in a US foreign policy that is constantly starting unnecessary wars or fomenting them via CIA-regime-toppling, the most recent of which is Syria. The US is not this benevolent big daddy taking care of his freeloading European vassals; it cannot keep its weapons-exporting-dependent economy going without selling weapons and ammo to all comers all over the world. Notice Ash Carter’s very recent announcement that we need to sell NATO forces and weapons to the Baltic states and Poland due to their supposed “fears of Russian aggression” a fear deliberately cultivated by the pathological liar, Gen. Breedlove. Without a constant stream of “threats” the US MIC cannot survive. I wonder if Mr. Trump has thought hard about how the US will make its money if it shifts to an otherwise totally desirable policy of respectful diplomacy and gives up the fatuous notion that it can “shove democracy” down any other country’s throat when it is so nearly dead here at home.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.