Kalashnikov Says Putin Will Soon Be Gone And Russia Will Face Collapse But Only For A Time – OpEd

By

Maksim Kalashnikov, a Z blogger who has frequently criticized Putin for failing to be more aggressive in Ukraine, says that “Putin’s tenure” as Russian leader is “drawing to a close” because of his failure to win the war in Ukraine decisively and that in the wake of his departure, Russia will enter “a period of chaos and instability.”

Indeed, the Putin critic from the right argues that after Putin goes, Russian elites will “install a weak puppet leader to try to mend relations with the West and secure the lifting of sanctions” (dialog.ua/russia/z-bloger-kalashnikov-prizval-rossiyan-gotovitsya-k-tomu-chto-putina.html).

“I foresee an inevitable inter-clan struggle for the redistribution of spheres of influence, assets, and financial flows,” he says; and as that takes place, “the security services will be weakened, fragmented, and demoralized by the outcome of the so-called “Special Military Operation.” 

Kalashnikov argues that returning veterans will face “a destitute and unsettled life” and sill thus contribute to further economic decline, a rise in crime, the growth of inter-ethnic clashes, and the radicalization of Russian society. And all this, he concludes that “the disintegration of the Russian Federation can’t be excluded, at least for a couple of years.”

While Kalashnikov’s predictions are likely overstated, they are noteworthy for three reasons. First, his fears of what a Russian loss in Ukraine will mean for Putin and his country are likely widespread among Russian elites and will likely dictate that the Kremlin to the extent it can work to avoid that outcome.

Second, his suggestion that returning veterans will exacerbate problems in Russian life goes far beyond the usual suggestions that they will increase crime. Such a broader impact will be far more difficult for Putin or his successors to cope with given that repression alone is unlikely to work.

And third – and this is by far the most important – Kalashnikov’s suggestion that Russia will face a high risk of disintegration but only for a few years in the future means that in his view, Russia may disintegrate for a time but will with any luck be able to reassemble itself, as the Bolsheviks did after 1917.

About Paul Goble

Paul Goble is a longtime specialist on ethnic and religious questions in Eurasia. Most recently, he was director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy. Earlier, he served as vice dean for the social sciences and humanities at Audentes University in Tallinn and a senior research associate at the EuroCollege of the University of Tartu in Estonia. He has served in various capacities in the U.S. State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the International Broadcasting Bureau as well as at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Goble maintains the Window on Eurasia blog and can be contacted directly at [email protected] .

View all posts by Paul Goble →

Like what your read?

Please consider supporting Eurasia Review, and thanks for you consideration!



Eurasia Review

Eurasia Review is an independent international news and analysis platform founded in 2009. We publish timely news, in-depth analysis, and expert commentary on geopolitics, economics, security, and international affairs.

One thought on “Kalashnikov Says Putin Will Soon Be Gone And Russia Will Face Collapse But Only For A Time – OpEd

  • May 5, 2026 at 6:09 am
    Permalink

    Kalashnikov Says “Putin Will Soon Be Gone And Russia Will Face Collapse”. Very easy said by Critics. Russian strong national resilience and patriotism can indeed help a state absorb shocks. As seen in the case of Iran’s Ali Khamenei, removing a central figure in a highly centralized system does not automatically lead to collapse because institutions—like Iran’s clerical networks and the IRGS continue maintaining and redistributing power. However, beneath the surface, authority can shift, factions can compete, and new balances of power can emerge. In that sense, patriotism and institutional strength together provide stability, but they don’t altogether eliminate deeper internal adjustments that shape a country’s long-term trajectory.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *