A Legacy Of Corruption In The FDA And Big Pharma – OpEd


By Liam Cosgrove

Our healthcare system is broken, a fact nobody would have disputed in precovid days. Regulatory capture is a reality, and the pharmaceutical industry is fraught with examples.

Yet we trusted private-public partnerships to find an optimal solution to a global pandemic, assuming a crisis would bring out the best in historically corrupt institutions.

Here is a brief list of less-than-savory behavior demonstrated by our titans of healthcare: 

  • Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson plead guilty to “misbranding with the intent to defraud or mislead” and paying “kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe [their] drugs,” resulting in fines of $2.3 billion in 2009 and $2.2 billion in 2013, respectively. 
  • Pfizer settled another lawsuit for “manipulating studies” and “suppressing negative findings” just a few years later. 
  • Moderna has never developed an approved drug, yet one of their board members was placed in charge of Operation Warp Speed. This certainly is unrelated to the fact that they received the most federal vaccine research and development funding and have received over $6 billion from our government since the start of the pandemic.
  • Gilead Sciences paid $97 million in fines, because it “illegally used a non-profit foundation as a conduit to pay the Medicare co-pays for its own drug.”
  • In 2005, AstraZeneca’s drug Crestor was shown to be linked to a life-threatening muscle disease while the company withheld evidence of this and two dozen other effects from the public.
  • In 2012, GlaxoSmithKline paid $3 billion in fines, as it “failed to include certain safety data” relating to their drug, since labeled as connected to heart failure and attacks.

Thankfully, our public health guardians are in place to protect us from the greed and deceit of the private sector, right? Wrong. Enjoy another brief list:

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) worked behind the scenes with company Biogen to alter previously conducted trials of their $56,000 per year Alzheimer’s treatment, and “by removing the subset of people for whom the drug didn’t work, they found a slight statistical effect in favor of the drug.” Even after doing this, an advisory committee voted 10–0 against approving the drug. The FDA approved the drug anyway, causing three committee members to resign.
  • In that case, the third-party advisors did the right thing. This is not always the case: a study by Science Magazine tracking 107 FDA advisors for four years found that 62 percent received money from related drug makers, with 25 percent receiving over $100,000 and 6 percent receiving over $1 million. It only takes a few corrupt advisors to fix a panel and feign medical consensus.
  • In 2017, it was revealed that the acting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director for heart disease and stroke prevention had been secretly communicating with Coca-Cola, providing guidance on how “to influence world health authorities on sugar and beverage policy matters.”

The American healthcare system remains mired in good old-fashioned crony capitalism, fascism, corporatism, mercantilism, protectionism … fancy words for when private companies work with governments to subvert the forces of competition. The suppression of research into off-patent drugs is a nasty symptom of this problem.

While there are countless drugs to which this applies, we will discuss ivermectin. First, addressing the drug’s dismissal by its own manufacturer, Merck, let it be known that ivermectin is no longer under patent. Merck no longer owns exclusive rights to the drug’s production. The forces of competition have been bestowed upon the drug, thus making it far cheaper. Meanwhile, Merck is also currently rolling out an oral covid treatment, which the US government is providing $1.2 billion in funding to research. This would be under patent and may explain the company’s opposition to using ivermectin.

The usefulness of ivermectin remains debatable. However, it’s important to note that in early April 2020,  a study at the University of Monash in Australia suggested it can be effective. Moreover, the drug is FDA approved, has existed for forty years, won a Nobel Prize, and is extremely safe when used at recommended levels. Given the crisis and ivermectin’s safety—safe even if not conferring big benefits for covid sufferers—the rush to condemn use of the drug appears suspect. Indeed, a week after the Australian study was published, the FDA advised against using ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment, forcing desperate people to the black market and to self-prescribe versions of the drug intended for animals.

The FDA noted subsequently that “additional testing is needed.” Yet, to date, there has not been a single completed government-funded study on the effectiveness of ivermectin against covid-19. Meanwhile, they have funneled billions toward research into vaccines and patented treatments. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded trials for remdesivir, still under patent with Gilead, despite it being less effective and having more severe side effects than ivermectin. The FDA approved remdesivir under emergency use authorization (EUA) despite published trials, later stating “remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits.”

One would think that if “additional testing” is so important, the US government might be interested in funding research to examine the potential benefits of cheap, safe, and proven drugs that have shown some promise in treating covid. But that’s clearly not what going on. Funding is geared toward helping huge pharmaceutical companies develop new patented drugs. As long Big Pharma wants it, and if there’s a profit to be made, apparently our government will be there to provide funding.

This article was published by the MISES Institute


The Mises Institute, founded in 1982, teaches the scholarship of Austrian economics, freedom, and peace. The liberal intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) guides us. Accordingly, the Mises Institute seeks a profound and radical shift in the intellectual climate: away from statism and toward a private property order. The Mises Institute encourages critical historical research, and stands against political correctness.

6 thoughts on “A Legacy Of Corruption In The FDA And Big Pharma – OpEd

  • September 13, 2021 at 10:34 am

    Not surprised. This Covid 19 pandemic has opened my eyes to the corruption in our medical industry, and current day politics. Its gotten worse.

    One more:

    Chloroquine was viciously and constantly attacked for it’s horrible safety record. Joe said it was like injecting/drinking bleach.


    A guy died and his wife was in ICU because they drank FISH Tank cleaner.
    News reporting was that he died from a “Trump supported Drug” .
    They forgot the fish tank cleaner part.

    Oh, how about reality?

    Used for 70 years. Replaced quinine for malaria, still being used.
    10s of millions of doses given.
    Safety profile on the manufacturer’s label: EG. people with certain heart arrhythmias. < 1%
    Green Beret Medic Sgt. Mike prescribed it in Vietnam, 50 years ago.
    Typical regimen: 30+ cents a tablet, about 12 taken at home for 5 days.

    Studies were halted because volunteers dropped out after the press, “medical experts” and vile Joe opined.
    "You will die" said one medical "expert" hired by CNN, or MSNBC, or Post, TIMES, you know them. Mr. Potato head among them.

    Love your reporting.

  • October 12, 2021 at 6:50 am

    Well when I took ivermectin and agiclovir for HSV2 blisters were dramatically reduced but agiclovir on it’s own did not have reduce viral shedding this much.

  • October 12, 2021 at 9:53 am

    The irony of capitalism…

    • July 20, 2022 at 4:31 pm

      Cronyism (capitalism would have no FDA and thus no mandates against which medicines are used)

      • January 28, 2023 at 3:16 pm

        Capitalism is not what you seem to think it is, i.e. a level playing field. It’s always been some animals more equal than others. The human race is thus and nothing we may invent to make us feel better will change what we are.

  • November 20, 2022 at 3:50 pm

    My father, a US Army vet who served in both Vietnam and Korea, a patriotic American, and a decent and honest man through and through was fond of saying things such as “trust in your country, not in the people running it” and “just be glad we’re not getting all the government we’re paying for”. I learned everything I could from him before he was laid to rest in 2011 so I thought I had a pretty good idea how wasteful, corrupt, and incompetent the bureaucrats within the US Government were. I was wrong, again and again made shockingly apparent an on a near daily basis since 2016.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *