ISSN 2330-717X

Macedonia ‘Name’ Talks Mark Progress, Hardest Part Remains


By Sinisa Jakov Marusic

Progress has been made in the Greece-Macedonia name talks, both countries’ Foreign Ministers said after a meeting in the Macedonian town of Ohrid, but the hardest issues remain to be solved.

Thursday’s talks on the long-standing bilateral name dispute between Macedonian Foreign Minister Nikola Dimitrov and his Greek counterpart Nikos Kotzias resulted in progress, but as things move forward, the hardest issues remain to be solved last.

Dimitrov said that the third round of his talks with Kotzias went in open and sincere atmosphere, adding that for the first time they have discussed the time frame of implementation of a possible agreement.

“We talked about all the issues and the differences over the name dispute. On some of these issues there is a progress, as they are ripe, on some there are still differences” Dimitrov told a joint press conference with Kotzias in Ohrid.

“For the first time we talked about the time frame and the steps that need to be done, if a solution is reached and needs to be implemented. This was a conversation without outwitting, with great understanding of the needs of the other,” Dimitrov added.

On his part Kotzias said that the hardest issues are still not overcome.

“As we move closer and solve our problems, fewer topics remain to be solved, however these are the hardest ones” Kotzias said.

He also confirmed that progress has been made, expressing hope that the hardest issues will be overcome as well.

This has been the third round of talks between the two Foreign Ministers in the past month. The two ministers discussed the name issue twice in late March, first at a meeting in Skopje and then in Vienna.

The name dispute centres on Greece’s insistence that use of the word ‘Macedonia’ implies a territorial claim to the northern Greek province of the same name.

As a result of the unresolved dispute, Greece blocked Macedonia’s NATO membership in 2008. It has also blocked the start of Macedonia’s EU accession talks, despite several positive annual reports from the European Commission on the country’s progress.

In the absence of official information from the talks, media outlets in Greece and Macedonia have been speculating that some of the key issues, such as a new composite name for Macedonia with a geographical qualifier, have already been agreed.

The name ‘Upper Macedonia’ is being mentioned as one of the most viable options.

However, speculation has suggested that the key stumbling block remains the scope of the new name’s use.

While Greece says the new compromised name must be put into the Macedonian constitution as an additional guarantee, Macedonia prefers a solution that would apply only for international use.

Apart from the ministerial talks, another parallel meeting took place in Ohrid between the two countries work groups who are tasked to prepare a bilateral friendship agreement.

Dimitrov informed that the groups managed to align a draft document that, among many other things, should address Greece’s fears of Macedonian irredentism towards its own northern province that is also called Macedonia.

Both ministers are set to meet again in Thessaloniki, Greece in May 3 and 4.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.

Balkan Insight

The Balkan Insight (fornerkt the Balkin Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN) is a close group of editors and trainers that enables journalists in the region to produce in-depth analytical and investigative journalism on complex political, economic and social themes. BIRN emerged from the Balkan programme of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting, IWPR, in 2005. The original IWPR Balkans team was mandated to localise that programme and make it sustainable, in light of changing realities in the region and the maturity of the IWPR intervention. Since then, its work in publishing, media training and public debate activities has become synonymous with quality, reliability and impartiality. A fully-independent and local network, it is now developing as an efficient and self-sustainable regional institution to enhance the capacity for journalism that pushes for public debate on European-oriented political and economic reform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *