ISSN 2330-717X

South Asian Strategic Stability And India’s Nuclear Bomb – OpEd

By

In the history of nuclear proliferation, the month of May is of great significance for the South Asian region as in this month both India and Pakistan tested their nuclear weapons. South Asian nuclearization is dynamic and dangerous enough to be an issue of concern for not only the region, but also for international security.

May 2018 marks 20 years of overt nuclearization in South Asia, however, the often forgotten fact is that the process of nuclearization started way before 1998. Many would say that it started when in 1974 India tested nuclear explosive device under the guise of peaceful nuclear explosion. But the attempts to bring nuclear weapons in South Asia started even before 1974. However, that particular PNE by India started the chain reaction in the region and resultantly Pakistan started its own nuclear program to securitize its sovereignty and security. Before, India’s 1974 test, Pakistan had no intention of going nuclear.

On the other hand, the threat from China is taken as a reason behind India’s nuclearization. Nonetheless, a proper analysis of Indian ambitions and nuclear proliferation suggests otherwise. Initially the Indian nuclear program was projected as a peaceful program started at the time of Nehru administration. Additionally, it is believed that the military usage of India’s atomic program started under the rule of Lal Bahdur Shastari as the PM. But it was Nehru government that set the foundations of India’s atomic program by utilizing the master plan of Dr. HomiJehangir Bhabha, who entwined civil nuclear program with military nuclear program in a way where the growth of civil program would mean the growth of military program. He was a firm believer that the growth of Indian civilization was dependent upon atomic energy.

These views were expressed in 1948 when the concept of peaceful nuclear explosion didn’t even exist. Moreover, declassified US State Department documents tell that India was interested in the nuclear explosion technology since 1954. The timeline of these actions suggests that Nehru administration was aware of the future dimension of India’s nuclear program. Moreover, it also asserts that when it comes to the nuclear program, India’s actual policies are different from its state narratives and doctrines.

Later in 1974 by extracting plutonium from spent fuel at CIRUS and its reprocessing at Trombay under the supervision of HomiJehangir Bhabha, India tested its nuclear device under the label of peaceful nuclear explosion to avoid direct backlash from international community. In addition, it was also an attempt to develop a deterrent by demonstrating technological competence to all players in Asia-Pacific region. India started its program way before Chinese nuclear test and 1962 war.

Furthermore, by a peaceful nuclear explosion, a deterrent was established by India, which stopped the war during the crisis with Pakistan. Even then after 24 years of covert nuclearization, overt nuclear tests were conducted by India in May 1998. Beyond any doubt those tests changed not only South Asian, but also international security architecture and political environment. However, the problem of nuclear proliferation started when India made ambitious nuclear energy program, which was a tool to facilitate its military ambitions.

The question arises that when the deterrent was established and in place for 24 years, then suddenly what motivated India to conduct nuclear tests in 1998. Even if one believes that China was the reason behind India’s military nuclear program, still there was no immediate threat to India in 1998. Thus, the factor which motivated the Indian government in 1998 was its ambitiousness to rise as a threat in international system to adjacent states.

At the end of 20th Century international community was determined to make India, Pakistan and Israel sign the CTBT to achieve decisive success in attempts for non-proliferation. But, if the CTBT was signed by India the ability to develop all kind of missiles including ICBM would be taken away. Resultantly, the biggest South Asian state would never be able to show its strength at the regional and global level.

These actions taken by India to achieve its national goal of being a regional and international power, changed the security layout of South Asia. In addition, it has pulled the region into a neverending conventional and non-conventional arms race. Thus, to avoid war and counter India, Pakistan resorted to nuclear deterrence as a strategic stability in an environment of mistrust and on-going conflicts.

*Ahyousha Khan is a “Research Associate” at Strategic Vision Institute, Islamabad.


Enjoy the article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


4 thoughts on “South Asian Strategic Stability And India’s Nuclear Bomb – OpEd

  • May 16, 2018 at 5:23 am
    Permalink

    Since the inception of nuclearization in South Asia, tensions between India and Pakistan grew concerns internationally. 1998 nuclear tests were widely condemned by the international community and resulted in US sanctions. India because of its power and prestige factor and to be standing with the adjacent states went for conducting nuclear tests and dragged the region in to this race. In short India’s quest for nuclear weapons actually led the region towards instability and moreover mistrust among its allies or neighbors. In order to put a halt there is a need to define and propagate the policies which can better make India and Pakistan to avoid the maximum use of nuclear weapons and situations which can make nuclear war likely.

    Reply
  • June 5, 2018 at 8:13 pm
    Permalink

    The onus of promoting the nuclear arms competition in South Asia rests on India as it, once again, refused to accept Pakistan’s proposal for mutual and equal restraint on the development of nuclear and ballistic missiles. In fact, when Pakistan responded to the Indian nuclear tests, Indian parliament member Somnath Chatterjee condemned his country’s tests and directly addressed the then Indian prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, saying, “You have started a nuclear arms race in this region.”

    Reply
  • June 5, 2018 at 10:33 pm
    Permalink

    It is known to everybody that Pakistan’s nuclear tests were in response to India’s. Now the issue remains that India is in continuous effort to disrupt this ‘balance of terror’ present among the arch-rivals. This balance has helped avoiding war among the both countries more than once. But India through various steps such as remorseless missile development and BMD systems, want to achieve upper hand over Pakistan. Its rapid doctrinal shifts also affirm my assertion that India want much more than what it possess in the regional calculus. This is very dangerous in the tense regional environment.

    Reply
  • June 6, 2018 at 12:53 am
    Permalink

    The history of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons programme is a story of national resilience and tremendous sacrifices. The programme is solely for deterrence against India, and to stabilise the subcontinent. So, rather than using politicised sentiments to downplay Pakistan’s nuclear capability, the international community must mainstream Pakistan as a responsible nuclear state.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CLOSE
CLOSE

Notice: Undefined variable: font_family in /home/eurasiar_bak/public_html/wp-content/plugins/gdpr-cookie-compliance/moove-modules.php on line 282