Medicare And Medicaid Destroyed Healthcare – OpEd


By Jacob G. Hornberger*

In a December 1 article entitled “Yes, Americans are Feeling the Squeeze. It’s Coming from Health Care,” Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson points out that “In the early 1960s, before Medicare and Medicaid, which were enacted in 1965, health spending was about 2 percent of federal outlays. Now it is nearly one-third, at $1.3 trillion.”

Samuelson goes on to observe that

Government can’t cut health spending, so new spending reduces spending on other programs, raises taxes or bloats deficits. The effects are felt keenly by middle-income Americans and the poor, because the high cost of modern medicine consumes more of their incomes. We have created a monster, inspired by good intentions, that is slowly and menacingly taking charge of our future.

Unfortunately, Samuelson doesn’t wrap up his article with the obvious conclusion, that the only possible solution to America’s healthcare crisis lies with repealing Medicare and Medicaid and, in a broader context, ending government involvement in healthcare.

Before Medicare and Medicaid, the United States had the finest healthcare system in history. Healthcare costs were low and stable, to such an extent that most people didn’t even have major medical insurance. That’s because they didn’t need it. Going to the doctor was like going to the grocery store. How many people have grocery insurance to help them cover soaring grocery costs? Healthcare costs were just as low and stable as grocery store prices, so there was no need for major medical insurance.

At the same time, healthcare inventions and innovations were skyrocketing. Doctors loved what they were doing, and, equally important, the poor were being treated by both doctors and hospitals, purely on a voluntary basis.

I grew up in Laredo, Texas, which is on the Texas-Mexico border. When I was a kid, we were told that the Census Bureau had named Laredo the poorest city in the United States. Every day, the doctors’ offices in Laredo were filled to capacity, sometimes also with people from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. Doctors knew that a large percentage of them could not pay. Yet I never heard of a single doctor turning anyone away. They were knowingly providing free medical treatment to the poor on a voluntary basis.

A modern-day example of this phenomenon was with my dentist here in Virginia. There is no Medicare or Medicaid for dental services. Several years ago, he told me that he and other dentists had gotten together and, on a rotating basis, were providing free dental care to the poor one day a week.

Everything changed with the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid. Healthcare costs began soaring. Doctors and hospitals began entering into all sorts of complex and convoluted arrangements to deal with the increasing crisis. Consumers started buying major medical insurance. The federal government embarked on a series of never-ending reforms. Doctors began to hate what they do and started to retire early. The drive toward medical invention and innovation lost its vitality. Today, many consumers are being pushed into bankruptcy owing to enormous medical bills.

Medicare and Medicaid ended up destroying the finest healthcare system in history, and the healthcare crisis has become a permanent part of American life. Perhaps worst of all is the mindset of dependency that it has inculcated in the American people, many of whom are convinced that without Medicare and Medicaid people would be dying in the streets. These two socialist programs have contributed to the lack of faith that modern-day Americans have in voluntary charity, free markets, and in freedom.

In the process, what so many people simply do not want to confront is that there is only one solution to this never-ending crisis — the repeal of its original cause, the repeal of both Medicare and Medicaid. Most everyone just keeps coming up with minor reforms or looking for some sort of “comprehensive healthcare reform” that will finally make the system work.

They’ll never find it, and they are just wasting their time, money, and energy looking. If we learned anything from the twentieth century, it is that socialism is inherently defective. It is incapable of working and it produces crises. And the very worst thing that Americans could do is double down by making their healthcare socialism even larger.

When a patient has cancer, the recommended treatment is to remove the cancer if possible. Medicare and Medicaid are cancers of the body politic. It is still possible to remove them through repeal. The longer they are permitted to remain and grow, the bigger the chance that the patient will die.

Originally published by the Future of Freedom Foundation.

*About the author: Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

Source: This article was published by the MISES Institute


The Mises Institute, founded in 1982, teaches the scholarship of Austrian economics, freedom, and peace. The liberal intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) guides us. Accordingly, the Mises Institute seeks a profound and radical shift in the intellectual climate: away from statism and toward a private property order. The Mises Institute encourages critical historical research, and stands against political correctness.

2 thoughts on “Medicare And Medicaid Destroyed Healthcare – OpEd

  • December 16, 2019 at 11:22 am

    This article says no need for a health system to take care of the needy. Just let them die. This is just Malthus again. Malthus wanted wars in order for the extra population to die. Those the so-called free market economists want the needy just to be sick and die. They do that by blaming any institution the are not interested in.
    Health care is bad because hospitals, doctors, and other supporting institutions have been using business ethics which depend on keeping people sick in order to milk them for good. The drugs they prscribe generate side-effects worst than the current causes of sickness.
    To fix health care the system need socialization of the entire system because monopoly capitalism is totally inefficient and costlt. The entire system is based on monopoly and oligopoly which economic theory has demonstarted clearly that they are inefficient.
    Once the economic base is inefficient and corrupted the political system will follow. Hayek, a great Austrian economist, once argued that the in in politics the bad goes on the top. Now monopoly capitalism is filled with bad politicians and bad health institutions which are using business textbooks to know how to corrupt the numbers to exploit the system and the people. He also argued that a society needs basic income to provide for the living condition of the needy. I am sure, Hayek may be considered a Soviet-type economist by the author of this article.
    The article should at least state whether when a person visits a doctor will know the charge. No one knows except when you get the statement which is filled in numbers that are unrelated to the cause of the sickness. It does not surprise people that the health system in the USA makes 20 percent of the GDP.
    Finally, for those economists Tax cut and control of the wealthy on all sectors will solve all the economic problems but by taking down all the marginalized people. Let us all submit to the Free Market that has never existed in reality.

  • December 17, 2019 at 5:17 pm

    This entire article fails to list even a single source — because it’s all fake right-wing propaganda trying to rewrite history.

    “Before Medicare and Medicaid, the United States had the finest healthcare system in history. Healthcare costs were low and stable, to such an extent that most people didn’t even have major medical insurance. That’s because they didn’t need it. ”

    Actually, it’s because medical insurance didn’t exist until the 1920’s, which is decades before medicaid/medicare were even introduced. Dumb argument tied to fake “facts.” For instance, doctors were all happy then — but are now really unhappy because of different insurance? Right, okay.

    0/10 article. Please try again.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *