ISSN 2330-717X

Mexico Pulls The Plug On Renewables – OpEd

By

Endless subsides for intermittent electricity not in the budget

As Mexico is poised to plunge into its worst recession in recent-memory the leftist president is making cuts and pulling the plug on subsidy dependent intermittent power from wind and solar that has been driving up the cost of electricity for its financially challenged population.

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador won the 2018 election by a landslide. His approach to government spending — even in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic fallout — might best be compared to that of conservative icons Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

Recognizing that industrial wind and solar electricity bring little to no value to electrical grids, Mexico is moving to avoid the higher electrical prices experienced by Germany, Denmark, Great Britain, South Australia, California, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and other governments that have heavily subsidized their supply of intermittent electricity. 

The only things ‘inevitable’ about the ‘transition’ to wind and solar are rocketing electricity prices and unstable power grids. As to the latter, the Mexican government has taken a stand that has sent renewable energy rent seekers into a tailspin.

The Mexican government’s concept, not without merit, is that if you are looking for a reliable electricity supply, then it does not make much sense to rely on the ‘unreliables’.  Mexico needs reliable and affordable power, more than ever.

Mexico’s Centro Nacional de Control de Energia (Cenace), which oversees the electrical system, indefinitely suspended critical tests for new intermittent electricity projects as the nation grapples with the spread of the coronavirus.

The stage is now set for yet another legal dispute between Mexico’s government and the intermittent electricity sector, with the Mexican government acting to freeze project connections in a supposed bid to underpin system stability in the COVID-19 era.

While the wind and solar industries seem eager to deliver their peculiar brand of a ‘healthy environment’ for Mexicans, their government appears more inclined to ensure the delivery of affordable electricity as and when Mexicans need it. 

Whether you’re a South Australian business owner trying to keep your head above water, a farmer’s wife in Ontario trying to keep your head on your pillow and sleep despite incessant turbine generated low-frequency noise and infrasound or an Eagle just trying to keep its head, you’ve probably formed a pretty strong opinion about the ‘merits’ of subsidized wind electricity. 

Oaxaca is a state in southern Mexico that is home to almost two-thirds of Mexico’s wind-power capacity, including the Tehuantepec turbines. Many people in towns with wind parks seem to still favor them, but over time, people have seen less benefits than originally promised. Job opportunities, for example, have fallen short of expectations, locals say. And the touted improvements to roads or schools also have not materialized, overall. 

After the trillions spent on industrial wind turbines and solar panels that do not deliver as advertised, the worldwide ecological destruction from the mining of precious minerals leave lands uninhabitable and worthless for plants and trees. Renewable taxpayer handouts have stripped landscapes. Left in the wake of intermittent electricity farms and subsidized biomass-fueled power plants is cynical at best, and mercenary in their ability to destroy nature’s ability to alleviate the coronavirus via cleaner air.

During this global pandemic, dependence on China for rare earth minerals, which solar panels and wind turbines are useless without, makes clean energy a costly proposition.

The environmental destruction that wind turbines create is extraordinary – “building one wind turbine requires 900 tons of steel, 2,500 tons of concrete and 45 tons of plastic.” 

Wind and solar also bring little to no value to electrical grids. When the sun does not shine, and the wind does not blow at set speeds it destroys a grid spinning reserve mode, peaking mode, and backup mode. Similarly, in Great Britain Prime Minister Boris Johnson catches coronavirus, and his country struggles with an unstable grid over widespread adoption of renewables for electricity. In the age of COVID-19 there are life and death matters if electricity is hampered for any length of time.

Renewables then make no sense when the entire world is sick. Only using Warren Buffet’s logic does chaotic wind power bring financial wealth when Mr. Buffett said: “We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That is the only reasons to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.”

What makes the entire notion of relying on chaotically intermittent renewables dangerous is a seminal work by energy expert Robert Bryce titled, “Question of Power: Electricity and Wealth of Nations,” which highlights this startling fact:

“Roughly 3.3 billion people – about 45 percent of all the people on the planet – live in places where per-capita electricity consumption is less than 1,000 kilowatt-hours per year, or less than the amount used by a refrigerator.”

Uncertainty is the one constant the coronavirus has shown. Long-term planning is no longer in vogue – now it is understanding cratering oil prices and a possible Great Depression. If the World does not get back to work soon, trillion-dollar deficits as the new norm, and prosperity taking a backseat to police-state-like shut-ins. 

More than 6,000 products come from the derivatives of crude oil, including every part in solar panels and wind turbines. Additionally, renewables cannot produce the critical medical equipment like ultrasound systems, ventilators, CT systems, and X-ray, medicines, masks, gloves, soap and hand sanitizers for hospitals, and protective gear for doctors and nurses. All those products begin from crude oil, or as the Wall Street Journal states – “Big Oil to the Coronavirus Rescue.”

More damning for renewables than endless subsidies or the billions of people needing reliable electricity, is the fact that without the products from petroleum derivatives the coronavirus would rage unchecked.


Thanks for reading Eurasia Review. For more of our reporting make sure to sign up for our free newsletter!

Ronald Stein

Ronald Stein

Ronald Stein, Founder and Ambassador for Energy & Infrastructure of PTS Advance, headquartered in Irvine, California.

3 thoughts on “Mexico Pulls The Plug On Renewables – OpEd

  • Avatar
    May 23, 2020 at 6:37 pm
    Permalink

    Fossil fuels. The energy supply of today and the future. The Time of Clean Coal is Now Here. Coal can be combusted putting into the atmosphere less CO2 than a natural gas power plant. There are ways to increase natural gas energy efficiency so it will also emit less. And these power supplies are constant.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    May 24, 2020 at 10:12 am
    Permalink

    “We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That is the only reasons to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.” (Warren Buffett)

    At the same time, buying a chain of regional newspapers doesn’t make sense without a future government bailout. Hillary promised the MSM that bailout, but she lost. So Buffett recently sold those papers at a large loss.

    The next question is, how long will Jeff Bezos (bought the WaPo) and Carlos Slim (bought a large stake i the NYT) continue throwing good money after bad?

    Reply
  • Avatar
    May 24, 2020 at 8:14 pm
    Permalink

    What is not added is very simple and absolutely true. “For ever action, there is a reaction!”

    In 1953, a 9th grade physics taught us about the weather and he stated, “Today’s solar energy is tonight ‘s winds and tonight’s winds are tomorrow’s weather.”

    The Green Solar Panels destroy tonight’s wind by changing the solar energy heating a surface, which normally gives up its heat at night with the heated air rising, while pulling in cooler, heavy air to replace it. The wind power mills changes tonight’s winds by removing the energy of the moving wind, causing the winds to seek other routes with lease resistance. Which changes tomorrow’s weather. Which, put simply, accounts for most of the “climate change” of today.

    Proof, look up the “Chicago Down Wind Effect.” After tall building were built in Chicago in the 1930’s, the weather people realized the weather had changed down wind for 50 miles. As the wind swept around Chicago, instead of fighting the resistance of going over and back down. Which, on its own, would have changed the Chicago weather.

    If one, simply charts the rise of “something for nothing” solar energy and wind power mills, one will find a direct correlation to this recent Climate Change, over the normally, slowly changing climate. Neither solar or wind delivers “something for nothing” and both are directly responsible, “for every action there is a reaction.” Otherwise, climate change!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.