ISSN 2330-717X

The Other 99 Percent: How The U.S. Compares – OpEd


By Salvatore Babones

One reason why the Occupy Wall Street movement grabbed the world’s attention was its protest against the injustices of 21st century capitalism. The Occupiers focused on the fact that “the other 99 percent” — the non-wealthy majority of the population — are increasingly excluded from the world’s economies.

The other 99 percent didn’t benefit from the economic booms of the 2000s. The other 99 percent didn’t cause the global financial crisis. The other 99 percent paid for the bank bailouts of 2008. And yet, the other 99 percent are now being asked to suffer cuts in pay, benefits, and government services. Increasingly, the other 99 percent are saying “no.”

Occupy movements have now sprung up in at least 20 countries, and probably more. They all speak, in one way or another, for the other 99 percent. But the other 99 percent means different things in different places.

In some countries, the other 99 percent are truly oppressed. In others, they manage reasonably well.

The accompanying figure shows the percentage of total income going to the other 99 percent in eight different countries. The data are taken from the World Top Incomes Database produced by economists Emmanuel Saez, Facundo Alvaredo, Tony Atkinson, and Thomas Piketty. This database uses tax records to analyze the distribution of income across countries.

What immediately stands out in this figure is that the other 99 percent do far worse in the United States than in any other developed country. The other 99 percent take home just 82.6 percent of America’s personal income. In the United States the share of the other 99 percent has been falling for decades.

(The data in this figure are from 2005 because that’s the latest year for which comparisons are available for most of our peer countries.)

The other 99 percent share of total income reached a high of 92.3 percent in 1973. Back then, U.S. income distribution looked the same as it does in continental Europe today. It fell slightly in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In the mid-1980s it was still over 90 percent. Then the slide began.

The share of the other 99 percent’s income fell from 90.9 percent to 83.5 percent between 1986 and 2000. It reached its lowest point at the height of the 2000s boom, just before the global financial crisis. By 2007, the income share of the other 99 percent had declined to just 81.7 percent.

In other words, between the 1970s and the 2000s the United States went from looking like a European country to looking like an African country. Data are available for very few poor countries, but even in South Africa the income share of the other 99 percent is higher than it is in the United States.

The only developed country that comes close to the United States in the decimation of its other 99 percent is the United Kingdom. In the UK, the other 99 percent take in 85.8 percent of total income, down from 90.2 percent in 1990, the earliest year with data are available. Surely it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest Occupy encampments have been in New York and London.

Back in the 1970s, the United States and United Kingdom looked, statistically, more or less like the rest of the developed world. We may have had our own distinctive institutions and policies, but the outcome for the other 99 percent was similar in the US, UK, Europe, Japan, and Australia. It’s simply not true that American — or British — capitalism has always been more unequal than in the rest of the world.

With the Reagan-era tax cuts and union busting in the 1980s the United States moved decisively from being a country for the other 99 percent to being a country for the top 1 percent. The same happened in the United Kingdom after the premiership of Margaret Thatcher, though her policies were more strongly resisted and took longer to have an impact. Today, the United States and the UK represent pathological economic models, out of step with the rest of the developed world.

The decline of the other 99 percent in the United States has been underway for 30 years or more. It will take a major, sustained effort to restore normalcy. If we want to restore a healthy income distribution, somehow we have to claw our way up from the low 80s to the mid-90s.

In other words, it’s not enough to stem the decline of the other 99 percent. At some point in the near future ordinary workers have to start getting raises that are actually higher than those of their bosses and CEOs, and they have to keep getting those higher raises for 30 or 40 years. That may sound like a fantasy scenario, but it happened from the 1930s through the 1970s. It can happen again.

Policies to support the other 99 percent include a shift in taxation from payroll taxes to capital gains taxes, an expansion in government employment and government salaries, support for unions, and much higher minimum wages. The experience of other countries shows that such policies are possible in the United States. It all comes down to politics: If the other 99 percent demand these policies, they certainly have the numbers to get them.


Other Words

OtherWords distributes commentary and cartoons aimed at amplifying progressive analysis in the national conversation. It empowers readers to become more engaged citizens.

2 thoughts on “The Other 99 Percent: How The U.S. Compares – OpEd

  • Avatar
    December 19, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    “That may sound like a fantasy scenario, but it happened from the 1930s through the 1970s. It can happen again.”

    That IS a “fantasy scenario”; it will never reoccur.

    From 1912-1921, and from 1933-1947, the USA profited from two world wars in which they were the chief supplier of war materials but only a belated minor combatant; this resulted in the USA becoming the world’s Major net CREDITOR country. All others of any size were net debtors.

    This culmunated in the Bretton Woods pact where the USA with 90% of the worlds gold, 75% of the gross world product, including means of production made the US$ the de facto Worlds currency; I.e. It was freely exchangable for gold at a fixed $35/oz.

    That “scenario” did not last. as of 1947, The major supplier become the major consumer of war materials; the USA was then continuously in a “cold war” scenario which after 1950, became ‘hot’ for much of the time.

    Others now became suppliers to USA war needs; military bases and petroleum being obvious requirements for foreign wars that then produced a net cash outflow. Others’ wars are naturally more profitable than ones own; casualties, living and material are a cost 100% to combatants.

    Now after 65 years as “cops of the world” from Mediteranean and East-Central Europe (NATO)to Taiwan, Korea to Viet Nam and on to Mid-East, the USA is the worlds number one DEBTOR country.

    Any ideas envisioning debtors as being in a similar “scenario” as creditors are indeed “FANTASY”>

  • Avatar
    December 20, 2011 at 3:50 am

    Thank you for the data, its summary and your thoughts which further our understanding of the deepening fissure. The dimensions of the fissure aren’t random or accidental and it continues to worsen. Do you wonder if the acumen behind this phenomenon keeps us distracted by non-issues as dumped on us by the media 24/7? So, when you say “It all comes down to politics: If the other 99 percent demand these policies, they certainly have the numbers to get them.”. A high percentage of us, consistently and dependably, are conned out of demanding more equity by voting on whatever candidate gaffe the media is serving. Looking forward to your next comment.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.