ISSN 2330-717X

Greece, Macedonia To Meet With Little Expectation


(EurActiv) — Greek and Macedonian leaders are to meet on the sidelines of next week’s EU summit amid few indications that they will make in headway in the dispute over national identity that has prevented Macedonia from starting accession talks since becoming an EU candidate seven years ago.

Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos recently invited his Macedonian counterpart Nikola Gruevski to meet in Brussels during the 1-2 March Summit, the first between the two since Papademos was appointed on 11 November 2011. Greece is expected to hold elections before Easter.

“For the name issue, our position is that it should be resolved through meaningful negotiations under the auspices of the UN; therefore, I encourage you to work towards this goal in a constructive manner,” Papademos wrote in a letter to Gruevski.

Macedonia said it “welcomed the consent” of Greece for holding a high-level bilateral meeting, hinting that Skopje has been more active than Athens in initiating such contacts. However, until yesterday afternoon (21 February), Macedonia’s mission to the EU was unaware if Gruevski would attend.

Greece and Macedonia have been locked in a dispute over the smaller country’s constitutional name since it became independent from the crumbling Yugoslavia in 1991. Greece, which once imposed a punishing embargo on its neighbour, claims the name implies territorial ambitions on its northern province of the same name.

ICJ ruling and NATO bid

The International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled in December that by blocking Macedonia’s NATO bid in April 2008, Greece breached a bilateral agreement signed in 1995. Under the accord, Greece said it would not prevent its neighbour’s accession to international organisations so long as it is referred to as “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (FYROM).

In the meantime, Macedonian President Gjorge Ivanov wrote to the heads of state and government of NATO countries, asking them to “repair the injustice” of the 2008 summit. In view of the next NATO summit due in May in Chicago, Ivanov asked the 28 leaders to take into account the ICJ ruling and accept his country as NATO member.

Following the ICJ ruling, Macedonia could realistically expect to be accepted as NATO member under the name the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Greek President Karolos Papoulias met with NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on 16 February and reportedly conveyed the message that his country wanted to reach a “mutually acceptable solution” over the name dispute. Reportedly, Papoulias also complained that Skopje persisted in appropriating history and even asked Rasmussen to help overcoming the problem.

PM avoids Commissioner

Papademos and Gruevski will put a brave face and meet, but it is doubtful that they would make any progress on their name dispute, one diplomatic source told EurActiv.

Another diplomat saw the glass as half-full: even if the meeting turns out to be a photo opportunity, that would already be something positive, the EU source said.

The reason for the pessimism stems for the latest visit of UN negotiator over the name dispute, MatthewNimetz, who met on Monday Gruevski in Skopje.

According to European Commission sources, the meeting was disappointing. Nimetz is due in Athens today.

Asked if Gruevski was going to hold meetings at the European Commission, a source from the EU executive said no such request had been made. The official added that Gruevski was avoiding visiting the Commission and seeing Enlargement Commissioner Štefan Füle, who has been very critical of recebt nationalistic actions in Skopje, seen in Athens as “provocations”.

Click here to have Eurasia Review's newsletter delivered via RSS, as an email newsletter, via mobile or on your personal news page.


EurActiv publishes free, independent policy news and facilitates open policy debates in 12 languages.

2 thoughts on “Greece, Macedonia To Meet With Little Expectation

  • February 22, 2012 at 10:45 pm

    The ICJ verdict was ridiculous evasion of other previsions of the accord by dishonourable judges that pretended not to notice FYROM’s sudden change into “Ancient Macedonians” and “United Macedonia” rhetoric.

    Article 3 – Each Party undertakes to respect the sovereignty, the territorial integrity and the political independence of the other Party. Neither Party shall support the action of a third party directed against the sovereignty, the territorial integrity or the political independence of the other Party.

    Aricle 6.2 The Party of the Second Part hereby solemnly declares that nothing in its Constitution, and in particular in Article 49 as amended, can or should be interpreted as constituting or will ever constitute the basis for the Party of the Second Part to interfere in the internal affairs of another State in order to protect the status and rights of any persons in other States who are not citizens of the Party to the Second Part.

    Article 7

    1. Each Party shall promptly take effective measures to prohibit hostile activities or propaganda by State-controlled agencies and to discourage acts by private entities likely to incite violence, hatred or hostility against each other.

    3. If either Party believes one or more symbols constituting part of its historic or cultural patrimony is being used by the other Party, it shall bring such alleged use to the attention of the other Party, and the other Party shall take appropriate corrective action or indicate why it does not consider it necessary to do so.

    FYROM ultra natioanlists violate these provisions by repeatedly trying to insinuate parts of Greece belong to the former Yugoslav region of Vardar. To add insult to injury the former self-identifying ethnci Buglarians of FYROM even try to steal the very identity of Greeks.

    The longer FYROM apologists pretend not to notice their behavior, the more clearer their bigotry against Greeks becomes.

    • February 26, 2012 at 11:53 pm

      Anon,you forget to mention the interferance of Samaras and Mitsotakis by distributing 130 million dollars to Macedonian politicians and newsmen in black garbage bags.Also the propaganda againts Macedonia that has been waged by Greece since the break-up of Yugoslavia.
      Furthere to your missleading comment,the ICJ decision was 15 to 1 in favour of Macedonia.
      I quess,you Greeks are the very best of falsifying events and international documents.
      You do deserv a medal for it.Greece accomplished to swinder the eurozone and you are trying to tell them,they are responsible for your financial short comings.
      I wonder,who are you trying to convince?.


Leave a Reply to Anon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.