ISSN 2330-717X

Pakistan’s Basic Pay Scale University Faculty: Victims Of Multifaceted Discrimination – OpEd

By

It wouldn’t be wrong to say that the higher education in Pakistan has seen unprecedented changes and growth, since the early 2000s, when Dr. Atta ur Rehman was at the helm of the affairs of higher education. The growth of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the country can be witnessed by manifold increase in the number of varsities, the number of Ph.D faculty, research output in terms of the number of research publications, growth in new programs, enrollment and graduates, etc.

However, this doesn’t mean that it’s growth and prosperity for all. The dark side of these heydays is the dismal state of affairs of basic pay scale (BPS) faculty, one of the oldest public servants’ management systems of the country that has rendered altruistic services in the varsities across the nation over the decades.

Currently, BPS faculty are the most marginalized; discriminated against, and deprived as compared to the tenure tracked system (TTS) based faculty and even administrative cadre.This discrimination is multifaceted, i.e. monetary, career growth, and representation.

The BPS faculty has been discriminated against in terms of the huge difference between remunerations of BPS faculty as compared to that of TTS faculty. The remunerations difference between the aforementioned groups ranges from 19 percent to a staggering 25 percent from the position of Assistant Professor to full Professor. Similarly, the latter is getting at least a double annual increment as compared to that of the former.

The unabated discrimination does not stop here, the TTS faculty also bags an additional 13th salary every year, in the form of gratuity as instant cash proceeds. Moreover, the TTS faculty also has the luxury of up to 4 advanced increments that used to be granted, indiscriminately and across the boarded, generously over the years.  If this staggering monetary disparity, based on the time value of money is taken into account over the period of employment, then the monetary gap between the groups is almost not comparable.

Now coming to career growth based discriminationagainst BPS facultyvis-à-vis TTS faculty. There is no concept of time-scaled promotion for the former. However, the same is guaranteed through TTS Statutes, for the later. For instance, the timeline for promotion from Assistant Professor to Associate Professor in case of TTS faculty is 6 years but there is no timeline as such for the BPS faculty.

Similarly, the duration to promote from Associate Professor to Professor for the later is 4 years but an indefinite time in case of the former. Above all, to further boost the morale of TTS faculty, a premature and/or retrospective promotion is also a common ritual that is unthinkable in case BPS faculty.All in all, the administrative cadre too enjoys time-scaled promotion, despite being an auxiliary component of the HEIs.

The love affair with TTS faculty within HEIs can be witnessed by the occupation of administrative positions by TTS faculty, even during the probation period, which is strictly prohibited as per TTS statutes. Despite the factHEC itself has taken serious notice of this, still it is a common practice.

This multifaceted institutionalized discrimination is a source of deep despondency and dismay among the BPS faculty, which constitutes almosttwo-third of the public sector Universities faculty. At the same time, this is in total contradiction with the Constitution of Pakistan. The most recent example of which is the constitution of the BPS/TTS review committee by HEC, however the seriousness of the HEC can be witnessed from the constitution and minutes of the committee, wherein the committee lacks true representation as well as willingness to address the core issues of the BPS faculty.

To fulfill the aspirations of the BPS faculty, HEC has to take the following immediate steps; 

1. Abolishment of the existing BPS/TTS review committee and reconstitution of the new committee, with a proportionate based representation of BPS faculty

2. Review of BPS service structure, in a true sense, and removal of the existing bottlenecks from it.

3. To bridge the existing monetary void between BPS and TTS faculty, preferably to bring the remunerations of entire faculty irrespective of BPS/TTSat par with the market level.

4. Introduction of a uniform dual track of promotion, i.e. fast track promotion (with the provision of premature fitness-based promotion, similar to that of TTS) as well as time-scaled promotion (i.e. seniority-cum-fitness based promotion system) for faculty.

5. Bring in a uniform service structure for the entire faculty as far as promotion and career growth is concerned.

*Dr. Hidayat Ullah Khan, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Public Information Officer, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology (AUST), Havelian (22500), Abbottabad

5 thoughts on “Pakistan’s Basic Pay Scale University Faculty: Victims Of Multifaceted Discrimination – OpEd

  • June 24, 2020 at 6:53 pm
    Permalink

    A short but covering the important aspects of the issue with a logical and respectful manner, is the besuty of this article. It can only be done by You, Dr. Hidayat Ullah Khan.
    Neither, the HEC nor other stakeholders take these genuine seriously. It can rightly be concluded that govt and HEC fail in their responsibilities.
    The “associations” need to be activated and mobilized for this purpose as it is the inevitable part of participatory democracy.

    Reply
    • July 4, 2022 at 5:21 pm
      Permalink

      You reply to the above article is extremly baised. 1. HEC ordinance says, BPS faculty will also have a criteria of promotion, but they don’t have while TTS had this criteria. 2. TTS faculty only complete their no papers in particular years, and get promoted without advertisement but BPS faculty having many no of better publications having no such policy. They again will wait for advertisement, they will again compete, again their will be selection board etc. TTS faculty do not have to wait for any such selection board and their is no compitition with him. Even they pay money to other people to complete few no of papers for promotion… 3. TTS is made by HEC for research Bd innovation, I did not seen any search innovation from thousands of TTS faculty members. Even their research paper is just like garbage. 4. If TTS are so competent then I think HEC should change the policy of 10 and 15 papers, and should ask them to write quality international standard books, which off course these low quality TTS are unable to write.
      5. A survey is conducted previously, 85% research projects of HEC won by BPS faculty members, not TTS faculty.

      Reply
  • August 14, 2020 at 6:02 pm
    Permalink

    the sad reality is this that we are addressing these issues at different forums on and off but never got a solution. We the teachers and doctors are the most important part of a nation but in reality we are the most ignored people.

    Reply
  • August 15, 2020 at 5:43 pm
    Permalink

    This article is not based on facts and is totally biased, BPS faculty enjoys job permanency, pension, each year salary revision and lots of other perks like no mid term and other evaluation. There is no competitive criteria and the research profiles of BPS faculty members is no way near to TTS faculy members, many assistant professors are not even PHDs in BPS.

    Having said that if any one thinks TTS has perks please welcome and compete. In my view the salary of BPS should be atleast half the salary of TTS given the promotion criteria of BPS and the facilities. Furthermore the caliber of BPS faculty is way lower than TTS and they choose comfort and pension over completion and hard-work.

    Hopefully HEC will think of this and abolish BPS from the universities to create a more research competitive environment in universities.

    Reply
  • January 9, 2021 at 3:51 pm
    Permalink

    Dear Sir this is valuable article. In addition I think there is also discrimination with Non PhD faculty in the similar.
    I think discrimination with Non- PhD faculty members also be highlighted..

    Regards
    Muhammad Ali Ansari
    Asstt: Prof.
    SAU Tandojam

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *