Sharpening The Tusk: India’s Strategic Design – OpEd


Amidst all the looming actions, the recent upsurge in India’s defense budget by 10 percent appears quite dubious; as it has now reached $43 billion. Whereas, the increased convergence of interests between United States and India specifically in the strategic sector makes the neighboring countries apprehensive of their growing defense procurements; this continuous trend of military modernization threatens to disturb the existing regional balance.

According to a report published by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), since the last four years, India’s defense imports were far greater than those of China and Pakistan. However, India has now undergone a shift in its policy which was introduced in the year 2014. With the primary aim of making India, ‘a global manufacturing hub’ which in turn will encourage both the multinational and domestic companies to manufacture defense products within the country. Such integration would then be a major game changer for India. In the past decade, India has greatly worked in revamping and modernizing the military infrastructure.

Congruently, New Delhi and Moscow have concluded a deal by which India will acquire ‘five regiments of Russian made S-400 advanced Air Defence Systems. The S-400 in comparison to its predecessor has an upgraded radar system; nonetheless it can purportedly fire four new kinds of ‘surface-to-air (SAM) missiles. Moreover, an understanding has been reached by both the states to hold mega war games in the month of October; their armies, navies and the air forces will for the very first time carry out such an exercise.

Until now, India has not participated in tri-services exercise at this large scale. On the other hand, India’s modernization efforts have been upheld by United States, largely. As stated recently by Admiral Tom Harris that United States is willing to help India for enhancing its military capabilities in ‘significant and meaningful ways’. US acknowledgement of India as major defense partner is expected to further boost the Indo-US defense ties and open new channels for US’ defense majors to offer and make their products in India. This convergence of the two governments will upgrade the collaboration at different levels. This expanded resistance participation will prompt the advancement of robust defense industry for India.

Furthermore, by 2020 India will be acquiring the advanced medium- range surface to air missile system which will have the capacity of shooting ballistic missiles and fighter jets; would also be able to carry out an attack from the range of 70kms. Developments like these, possess the tendency of increasing the already mounted regional precariousness.

Proactive strategies, renewed defense settlements and the conventional military build-up enable Pakistan to take counter measures while balancing the strategic equilibrium at the same time; for the Pakistani establishment is right to closely track Indian defense spending , reason being India remains in terms of its military capabilities, the key threat to Pakistan’s security. Be that as it may, a levelheaded, consistent point of view is truly what is required instead of the wild guessing in some hawkish quarters.

Nevertheless, the overdependence of India in terms of its defense procurements would eventually have a negative impact over country’s aspirations of being a global manufacturing hub. Besides, India is by and by the world’s largest buyer of conventional weapons, with an upwards 100 billion dollars anticipated, that would be spent on modernizing defense forces following the coming decade. India’s immediate neighborhood developments broadly identified the need for swift modernization of its armed forces. However, its indigenous development of modern defense hardware continues to remain a concern for it also lacks sophisticated weapons and armory.

India is directing a huge scale modernization of its military mainly in six key areas namely land, air, sea, nuclear, outer-space and cyberspace. This modernization is often obfuscated by logical limitations in consort with poor decision making likewise its policy aspiration for defense self-sufficiency remains largely elusive. Additionally, the major disputes involving India and its neighbors are to say ‘land centric’, highlighting the predominant role of the army in Indian security context.

To conclude, allotting this much amount of disbursements would further act as an escalating agent in the already present disputes. Though the realization which appears necessary to occur, is that where do we draw the line in this ever-growing arms race.

*Saman Rizwan is currently working as a Researcher in Strategic Vision Institute, Islamabad and is an undergraduate student at Department of Defence and Diplomatic Studies in Fatima Jinnah Women University.

3 thoughts on “Sharpening The Tusk: India’s Strategic Design – OpEd

  • August 31, 2017 at 1:57 pm

    Every few years the U.S. military conducts “war games” that play out a war between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. Every game ends the same: nuclear war. “It is a scary scenario,” Col. Mike Pasquarett, who runs the games at the U.S. War College, told the Wall Street Journal.

    Rather than escalating another war, arming India, and pressuring Pakistan, the United States should be pushing for the de-nuclearization of South Asia, peace talks with the Taliban, and a stand-down in Afghanistan.

  • September 5, 2017 at 4:25 am

    The question is: should India devote such a large part of its budget to the military? The issue is not only financial, but moral and political. While spending on defence increased, the budgetary allocation for health was reduced by 5.7 per cent to Rs. 33,152 crore. Would the money given to defence not be better spent on the development of public healthcare, education, affordable housing, and infrastructure projects? What’s surprising is how little discussion there appears to be in the national media about these levels of defence spending.

  • September 5, 2017 at 7:08 am

    The dilemma of the South Asian region is that with the passage of time, strategic stability is becoming more fragile instead of becoming strong. And that thing getting even more deeper down because of India intense military modernization program, its increasing defense budget, its focus on developing military capabilities in the major three areas of forces. And of-course these modernization plans and steps are making the other two nuclear state China and Pakistan more awakening in this regard and making them more vigilant in their response actions.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *