ISSN 2330-717X

Ron Paul: The War On Terror Is Creating More Terror – OpEd

By

The interventionists will do anything to prevent Americans from seeing that their foreign policies are perpetuating terrorism and inspiring others to seek to harm us. The neocons know that when it is understood that blowback is real – that people seek to attack us not because we are good and free but because we bomb and occupy their countries – their stranglehold over foreign policy will begin to slip.

That is why each time there is an event like the killings in Paris earlier this month, they rush to the television stations to terrify Americans into agreeing to even more bombing, more occupation, more surveillance at home, and more curtailment of our civil liberties. They tell us we have to do it in order to fight terrorism, but their policies actually increase terrorism.

If that sounds harsh, consider the recently-released 2015 Global Terrorism Index report. The report shows that deaths from terrorism have increased dramatically over the last 15 years – a period coinciding with the “war on terrorism” that was supposed to end terrorism.

According to the latest report:

Terrorist activity increased by 80 per cent in 2014 to its highest recorded level. …The number of people who have died from terrorist activity has increased nine-fold since the year 2000.

The world’s two most deadly terrorist organizations, ISIS and Boko Haram, have achieved their prominence as a direct consequence of US interventions.

Former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael Flynn was asked last week whether in light of the rise of ISIS he regrets the invasion of Iraq. He replied, “absolutely. …The historic lesson is that it was a strategic failure to go into Iraq.” He added, “instead of asking why they attacked us, we asked where they came from.”

Flynn is no non-interventionist. But he does make the connection between the US invasion of Iraq and the creation of ISIS and other terrorist organizations, and he at least urges us to consider why they seek to attack us.

Likewise, the rise of Boko Haram in Africa is a direct result of a US intervention. Before the US-led “regime change” in Libya, they just were a poorly-armed gang. Once Gaddafi was overthrown by the US and its NATO allies, leaving the country in chaos, they helped themselves to all the advanced weaponry they could get their hands on. Instead of just a few rifles they found themselves armed with rocket-propelled grenades, machine guns with anti-aircraft visors, advanced explosives, and vehicle-mounted light anti-aircraft artillery. Then they started killing on a massive scale. Now, according to the Global Terrorism Index, Boko Haram has overtaken ISIS as the world’s most deadly terrorist organization.

The interventionists are desperate to draw attention from the fact that their policies contribute to terrorism. After the Paris attacks, neocons like former CIA director James Woolsey actually pinned the blame on NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden! He claimed that because of Snowden’s revelations about NSA surveillance the terrorists were using sophisticated encryption. He even called for Snowden to be hanged because of it. But it was untrue: the Paris attackers did not use encryption, and other groups had used encryption long before the Snowden revelations.

Terrorism is increasing worldwide because of US and western interventionism. That does not mean that if we suddenly followed a policy of non-interventionism the world would become a peaceful utopia. But does anyone really believe that continuing to do what increases terrorism will lead to a decrease in terrorism?

This article was published by the RonPaul Institute.

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Ronald Ernest "Ron" Paul (born August 20, 1935) is an American physician, author, and politician who served for many years as a U.S. Representative for Texas. He was a three-time candidate for President of the United States, as a Libertarian in 1988 and as a Republican in 2008 and 2012.

3 thoughts on “Ron Paul: The War On Terror Is Creating More Terror – OpEd

  • Avatar
    November 30, 2015 at 8:10 pm
    Permalink

    Thank you Dr. Ron Paul for your sensible wisdom. Our policing the world and meddling in the middle east guarantees us a perpetual state of war. I don’t want to see our country continue on the path of perpetual war abroad, and perpetual spying at home. We need to change course.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    November 30, 2015 at 9:43 pm
    Permalink

    gee, seems the same results as the “war on drugs” seems declaring war on behavior rather than nations doesn’t work very well.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    December 2, 2015 at 9:40 am
    Permalink

    Excellent article. Thank you, Dr. Paul. Unfortunately, the hawks in Congress believe, beyond all the failure of that belief, that by destabilizing the entire world, the US could get control over the world as in “full spectrum dominance” as defined by the Bush admin in 2000. To any rational person it is clear that the US will never reach that goal. There will always be changes in government and governance in one country or another that will cause countries to ally differently. Russia and China will not let themselves be dominated by the US. And the hawks likely are fully aware of it. World hegemony and political dominance thus becomes the excuse to continue with a failed policy for the benefit of the US military industrial sector from which most in Congress get their riches. The US foreign policies have as much to do with money as they have to do with politics.

    The most laughable excuse Obama gave for the lukewarm response to ISIS in Iraq – that the US is very concerned not to cause any civilian casualties: when did the US ever care how many civilians get killed for its interests? And now it cares in Iraq – after the US killed close to 4m Iraqis with sanctions and wars? Clearly, the US reason for the pause in strikes is not the civilians, but waiting for the UK to get permission from its parliament to join strikes in Syria. It is very possible that the US/UK want to overrun Syria and Assad and Russia in order to reach their goal of ousting Assad and fragmenting Syria into one more failed state. That is of course why ISIS was left to get large enough to build its caliphate: to oust Malikki, partition Iraq and fragment Syria on the way to destroy Iran after the alliance between Hezbollah, Syria and Iran is prevented. The US is the worst sponsor of terrorism – to secure permanent war.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.