Bulgaria: Ruling Party Eyes Victory In Local Elections


By Martin Dimitrov

Control of 19 out of 28 regional cities in Bulgaria will be contested in the second round of local elections held on 3 November, though experts predict little drama and a repeat – albeit less decisive – victory for the ruling GERB party of Prime Minister Boyko Borsissov, compared to its record 2015 local elections result.

The party only won six regional cities – and backed two independent candidates – in the first round on Sunday, 27 October. By contrast, in the 2015 elections, the party won ten cities straight away in the first round and 22 overall.

The most important vote takes place in the capital, Sofia, where incumbent mayor Yordanka Fandakova faces former State Ombudsman Maya Manolova, who is backed by a plethora of organisations, including her former party, the Bulgarian Socialist Party, BSP and smaller centrist parties that, ironically, opposed the BSP until recently.

An Alfa Research poll from Wednesday put Fandakova in the lead with 55.3 per cent of the votes compared to 44.7 per cent for Manolova. But a significant 17 per cent of voters remain undecided who they back, Alfa Research says, which may yet create a surprise.

One reason for the high percentage of uncertain voters is because two other candidates who fared relatively well in the first round of the election have not endorsed either Manolova or Fandakova.

Those are the nominee of the centrist-liberal coalition Democratic Bulgaria, Borislav Ignatov, and the independent candidate of the Save Sofia movement, Boris Bonev. They won 12.2 and 10.8 per cent of the votes respectively.

Whoever wins the mayoral race in the capital, GERB and its ultra-nationalist partners, VMRO and Ataka, will still dominate decision-making in Sofia on the City Council. Of the 61 members of the assembly, GERB will have 27 deputies, VMRO four and Ataka two.

In the other 19 contested cities, GERB faces only limited opposition from BSP candidates. Polls suggest that BSP candidates have chances of winning in only three, Ruse, Razgrad and Pernik.

In a few cities, centre-right candidates and nationalists are contesting GERB’s rule, most importantly in Varna, where the ultra-nationalist and populist candidate, Kostadin Kostadinov, from the Vazrazhdane (“Revival”) party, won 15 per cent of the vote and will face the incumbent GERB candidate, Ivan Portnih.

In Plovdiv, Bulgaria’s second largest city, Zdravko Dimitrov, from the ruling party, will likely beat the VMRO candidate and ex-mayor Slavcho Atanassov, polls say.

Although the Central Electoral Commission, CEC, said no serious violations occurred during the first election round, some high-profile incidents took place. The national TV station bTV was fined for airing a report on the problematic repair to a central Sofian boulevard after a signal filed personally from Prime Minister Borissov. The election body described the TV report as an act of “agitation” against acting mayor Fandakova, causing an outcry from election watchdogs and journalistic organisations.

Mistakes were also recorded in the voting process in 90 per cent of polling committees in the capital alone, CEC conceded after the election. The most common mistake was not counting the preferential votes for individual candidates in the party lists.

While few investigations into vote-buying have been launched, both Borissov and Maya Manolova accused each other of effectively purchasing Roma votes in the run-up to the second round of the election in Sofia.

Balkan Insight

The Balkan Insight (formerly the Balkin Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN) is a close group of editors and trainers that enables journalists in the region to produce in-depth analytical and investigative journalism on complex political, economic and social themes. BIRN emerged from the Balkan programme of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting, IWPR, in 2005. The original IWPR Balkans team was mandated to localise that programme and make it sustainable, in light of changing realities in the region and the maturity of the IWPR intervention. Since then, its work in publishing, media training and public debate activities has become synonymous with quality, reliability and impartiality. A fully-independent and local network, it is now developing as an efficient and self-sustainable regional institution to enhance the capacity for journalism that pushes for public debate on European-oriented political and economic reform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *