ISSN 2330-717X

There’s Nothing Inappropriate About BJP And RSS Being The Same – OpEd

By

In the 16th century the Mughals, or Moguls, invaded India, stayed and then started the spread of the Islamic religion in the country. Some Hindu families were converted into the Islam religion by coercion and other methods.

In 1608, Britishers entered India as traders and then slowly started occupying the country, when Christianity spread in India. Somel Hindus were converted into Christianity by coercion and other methods.

With the entry of Mughals and Christian Missionaries and the systematically spreading of their religions in India, the threat started on the existentialism of the Hindu religion in India, with little resistance from Hindus for all practical purposes. While savants like Swami Vivekananda espoused the rich philosophy of Hindu religion  and brought it to the attention of some parts of the world and tried to create a sense of pride amongst Hindus, his valiant efforts had little impact on the rapid spread of Islam and Christianity in India at the cost of the Hindu religion.  

Many Hindus were helplessly concerned about the reducing number of the Hindu population in India. At this time, many concerned Hindus wanted to build a counter force to protect the Indian philosophy, tradition and culture and Hindu way of life,  which inevitably mean protecting the Hindu religion from further erosion. Thus, emerged the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS), a few years before India’s independence, which caught the imagination of a section of Hindus to some extent.

While years have passed and several developments have taken place and even RSS was banned for sometime in India for whatever reasons, the fact is that RSS remains as a force to be reckoned with in India. Attempts to discredit RSS has been continuing, but many people believe that RSS has played a positive role in stemming the onslaught on the existence of the Hindu religion in India. This is the ground reality.

RSS has been claiming that it is essentially a cultural organization, functioning with the objective of conserving and highlighting the traditions and value systems of India, which mean the philosophy of Hinduism. However, the fact is that several members of RSS have been showing interest in political activities, thinking that the attainment of political power is an essential requirement to protect the glory of India and the Hindu religion. 

Certainly, a decisive change took place when a pledged member of RSS namely Vajpayee became the Prime Minister of India and later on, another pledged member of RSS namely Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister and stayed on at the job after convincingly winning the national parliamentary election for second term, enjoying a reasonable level of public esteem and popularity.

While RSS continues to claim that it is a cultural and social organization and has involved itself in several welfare activities with admirable efficiency, the BJP continues to claim that it is an independent political party.

On the other hand, it is crystal clear that BJP is the political arm of RSS or RSS is the social arm of BJP, with foot soldiers of RSS actively campaigning for BJP in several elections. Both these entities are so closely intervened that one cannot anymore distinguish between RSS and BJP with regard to the goals and objectives.

Earlier, an impression was sought to be created that RSS functions independently and BJP functions independently. But, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has now removed this “curtain” by making the foundation stone laying ceremony of the Ram temple in Ayodhya as an official function and inviting the chief of RSS to participate in the function and the associated religious ceremony.

Obviously, Prime Minister Modi invited the RSS chief with the deliberate intention of establishing the fact and conveying the view to the nation that BJP and RSS are the same with regard to objectives and long term goals. The veil that BJP and RSS are different has now been erased by no less a person than Prime Minster of India.

Unlike the earlier Prime Ministers who were extremely reluctant to be seen  in the public eye as wedded to Hindu philosophy, Narendra Modi has clearly demonstrated his determination to be seen and understood as a Hindu with strong faith in Hindu philosophy and rituals.

In several other countries in the world, it is common for the governments to be officially associated with a particular religion as seen in several Islamic countries and other countries where Christianity is the official religion. This has not been so in India, as India has declared itself as a secular country.

While India continues to remain a secular country, with all religions enjoying similar status and those belonging to minority religions even getting special privileges, it is for the first time that an Indian Prime Minister has asserted the predominant status of the Hindu religion in India.

While the “secularists” in India object to this approach and stand of Narendera Modi, there is nothing wrong or ‘unsecular’ with regard to the approach of Modi, as the basic concept of secularism still stands strong and vibrant in India. A Prime Minister declaring himself as Hindu and adopting Hindu religious practices and his party being associated with another organization (RSS) wedded to spread of Hindu philosophy does not mean that the secular philosophy of India has been given up.

There is certainly nothing inappropriate in declaring that BJP and RSS share the same values and they complement each other.

N. S. Venkataraman

N. S. Venkataraman

N. S. Venkataraman is a trustee with the "Nandini Voice for the Deprived," a not-for-profit organization that aims to highlight the problems of downtrodden and deprived people and support their cause. To promote probity and ethical values in private and public life and to deliberate on socio-economic issues in a dispassionate and objective manner.

2 thoughts on “There’s Nothing Inappropriate About BJP And RSS Being The Same – OpEd

  • Avatar
    August 9, 2020 at 8:26 am
    Permalink

    Dear Sir,
    Namaste. I thought of writing a few lines in response to your article. I agree with some points like the PM’s right to practice his faith. But the assumption that Muslims and Christians converted forcibly need to be nuanced. Christianity in parts of India is as old as Christianity itself. The British did not propagate Christianity- instead often they opposed it for their commercial interests. And Christian missionaries had to often confront them in India and in British parliament for the rights and dignities of the people of India. If they propagated Christianity officially why India is still only 2.5% Christian? Did their state machinery fail? I wish you read Vishal Mangalwadi and other authors to broaden your perspective. Secondly, Hinduism too cannot forget its inglorious past– what happened to Buddhism in India? Read about the more recent conversion of tribal Meiteis to Hinduism and the Ahoms in Assam, and the suppression of the popular religious movement of Srimanta Shankardev in Assam by Brahminic forces. There are many such stories. All are guilty of different crimes, so let us not pronounce someone as holier than thou.
    PM Modi campaigned and came to power on sab ka vikas, and vikas is the hallmark of democracy . Secularism must respect all religions without the state favouring on over the other. Governance must be based on the good of all, especially the weaker sections (of all faiths) without discrimination. it is a pity we are sometimes secretly admiring theocratic states like Pakistan or any other country which has a state religion. India chose not to follow that path and we should be proud of what we chose, and not admire them and barter what we have with their failed models. Whatever religion you or I profess, we ought to work for the uplift of the people irrespective of caste or creed. Just as people change parties, we should respect an individual’s right to change religion, choose a different profession, place to live etc. I do not think any gods will be happy when we worship in a temple which is built after destroying a place of worship of another like Ram Temple in Ayodhya or usurped as in Hagia Sophia in Istanbul. Do you not see the politics behind these under the guise of religion and worship?
    I respect your work for the uplift of the people. May you and me consider all Indians as brothers and sisters.

    Reply
  • Avatar
    August 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
    Permalink

    Congrats to Mr.N.S.Venkataraman for his informative article.
    India is facing a serious problem for which no PRACTICAL solution is proposed so far.The percentage of population of each religious group shall remain CONSTANT.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.