ISSN 2330-717X

Should The Bishops Listen To The Laity? – OpEd

By

On November 12, the bishops will convene in Baltimore for what promises to be an important meeting. All eyes will be on a series of reforms that address sexual abuse, especially as it concerns the role of bishops. The 2002 Dallas norms applied to priests, but not the bishops.

Central to the meeting is the role of the laity. There have been many calls by the laity over the past few months seeking to influence the discussion, and some have organized. In fact, some will be present when the bishops assemble, hoping to have their voice heard. They cover a wide range of views. Some are responsible and some are an utter disgrace.

Should the bishops listen to the laity? Of course. Should the laity govern? No. They should know their place: Their role is advisory. If the bishops want to extend greater authority to them, they can, but it smacks of arrogance for the laity to think that they are better equipped to run the Church than the bishops. Many of them can’t even run their own lives without crashing on a daily basis.

Who among the laity should the bishops listen to? The ones who know their place. The first time I sat down with Cardinal John O’Connor was in December 1993. I started working at the Catholic League—our office was in the Catholic Center (the same building where O’Connor worked) on July 1, 1993. I had made some media splashes, motivating O’Connor to write about me. We had met briefly at a public event in the fall, but now he wanted to have a meeting.

Within five minutes, O’Connor asked me, “What do you need?” “Nothing,” I said. A few minutes later, he asked the same question, pressing me to respond. I said, “I want nothing from you. I came to serve you. I came to inherit your problems.” He turned to his assistant, an attorney, and said he could count on one hand the number of times this has happened to him over the years.

That’s why O’Connor listened to me. So have some other bishops. I don’t have a hidden agenda—the Catholic League is here to defend the Church against wrongdoing. I hasten to add that we are not here to defend wrongdoing committed by the clergy.

Any lay person who wants to help the bishops deal with the issue of sexual abuse should be as committed to the rights of the accused as he is  to the welfare of victims. Unfortunately, we hear a great deal about the latter these days, but little about the former.

In today’s environment it takes courage to insist on the due process rights of priests and bishops who are accused of sexual misconduct. However,  not to do so is a grave injustice. All of the accused must be considered innocent until proven otherwise, and there should be no exception for anyone who works for the Catholic Church.

There are serious juridical issues that will constrain the bishops from adopting measures to effectively address wrongdoing done by those in their own ranks. It is therefore not helpful to raise expectations of reform too much; canon law can be changed, but existing norms cannot be ignored. Any real changes must be embraced by Rome.

Bishops looking for guidance on which lay groups and individuals they should listen to should keep in mind the content of the proposed reforms and the tone of those making them. They should sniff out lay clericalism whenever it arises.

Beware of those on the right and the left who are proposing a mountain of reforms. Some are so intrusive as to be a menace. As a corollary, beware of those who pledge to “fix” everything. It should never be assumed that everything the bishops have done is in need of repair.

Indeed, the bishops need to be more vocal in touting their successes: the fact that in the last two years for which we have data, only .005 percent of the clergy have had a credible accusation made against them is testimony to the success of the Dallas reforms.

Tone matters. When the laity become lordly, look out. The most recent example is the condescending editorial posted on November 9 by the National Catholic Reporter. It does not advise the bishops—it lectures them. That this is coming from the same people who reject the Church’s teachings on sexuality, and who have long promoted a libertine vision—one that was adopted by many seminaries in the late 1960s and the 1970s, causing the sexual abuse scandal—makes the editorial all the more despicable.

There are those on the right and the left who are purists, men and women who insist that all the bishops are corrupt and should resign. No, those making such charges should resign. Sweeping generalizations made about any demographic group—indicting all of its leaders—is morally irresponsible.

Most of the bishops, like most of the priests, are good men. They need the support of the laity in times like these. What they don’t need is to be shouted at by self-righteous savants.


Enjoy the article? Then please consider donating today to ensure that Eurasia Review can continue to be able to provide similar content.


William Donohue

William Donohue

William Donohue is the current president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights in the United States, and has held that position since 1993.

2 thoughts on “Should The Bishops Listen To The Laity? – OpEd

  • November 10, 2018 at 1:18 pm
    Permalink

    This article fails outright…as the Church hierarchy so often does…by refusing to recognize that the laity, in sum, represent the Body of Christ. This is a heresy, not wisdom.

    Reply
  • November 10, 2018 at 3:49 pm
    Permalink

    Please explain what you mean by the laity knowing “their place“! Also, please tell me upon what you rely in asserting that the laity who are demanding transparency with regards to sexual immorality of the Clergy are hypocrites because they are the same Catholics who do not accept the Church’s teaching on sexuality and morality. I challenge that assertion. The Catholics who do not accept the Church’s teachings are either long gone or are on the way out. They don’t have the stomach for what’s happening in the Church because they lack any kind of depth of fate. The remaining Catholics fall into one of two categories. Either they are clericalists themselves. I would assert, like you. This group is focused on the preservation of the reputation of the Church and Her current hierarchy. The second group are those who are jumping up and down, screaming, saying their rosaries and will be outside at the meeting in Baltimore next week. They are the ones demanding transparency and oversight by the laity. Yes, they are demanding it! They are people who are devoted to and love the Catholic Church, but know it is broken. Your article reeks of being too closely alaigned with the Bishops. I’m going to suggest you read the following article:
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/dubia-signing-cardinal-praises-laity-for-protesting-vaticans-failure-in-abu

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CLOSE
CLOSE