Nepal: Democracy In Mortal Danger – OpEd


By Dr Gyan Basnet (PhD)

The practice of corruption is becoming a cancer without cure at all levels in Nepal. The ruthless exploitation of public property and money by politicians is becoming a common phenomenon. Such illicit behaviour of politicians and public officials hampers their development efforts and prolongs their stagnation. Pervasive corruption has polluted their system of governance, and, despite all the talk about its eradication, there has been no positive result to show. On the contrary, the practice spreads day by day, and it has infiltrated the entire political and administrative machinery of the nation. They, the people, are being forced to witness malpractices happening day by day with no power to stop any of them.

Many national and international reports on corruption and the abuse of power have shown that Nepal now has the dubious distinction of being one of the most corrupt countries in the world. What is so disconcerting is that people at all levels from lowly officials to powerful politicians are involved. After over twenty years of so-called democracy, people’s experiences can be said to be quite the opposite of what they expected at the outset. ‘Pajero culture’ was but one example of excessive corruption and criminalization in their politics that even included the large-scale bribery of MPs in order to defeat their own government.


Such shameful episodes have contravened all professional, ethical and moral standards, and even in their elections, it has not been programmes and ideologies that ensured victory for the political parties, but money, guns, and the misuse of power. They have experienced abuses of power and rampant corruption committed by politicians and public authorities: to the Pajero scandel can be added the Dollar scandal, the Dhamija scandal, the Lauda Air scandal and, recently, the Sudan Ghotala.

A few weeks ago, the caretaker government approved an Ordinance (No elected body exist in the country since May 27 after sudden demised of the elected Constituent Assembly) that established new criteria for the distribution of state facilities to VIPs, including their former President and Vice President. For each it becomes a life entitlement. The decision by the Council of Ministers to set new criteria that apply, not just to former presidents and vice presidents, but to former prime ministers, home ministers, chief justices and speakers clearly illustrates the current government’s priorities. As such it is shameful, and it clearly continues the malpractices that have been going on for decades in the country. The question must be asked: Is this not a further example of open corruption and misuse of power by their politicians? Do they really have the right to do just what they like with the country’s assets? Does it not amount to open looting of public property and taxpayers’ money? Does self-interest prevent their leaders from speaking out against it? Should politics not be about voluntary and selfless service on behalf of the people and of the country? If so, why does the state have to provide politicians with lifetime facilities? What is the moral justification for that? Why are there not rules of conduct regarding this?

The Mafia State

Nepal is home to some of the poorest of the world’s poor. Over sixty per cent of their population still lives on less than $1 a day. Institutionalised corruption and creaking bureaucracy, meanwhile, are par for the course. They have a constitutional body, whose duty it is to fight against such atrocities, and they have NGOs, civil society and the media to monitor that fight, but the practice of corruption continues unhindered. Why? How can it be corrected? Why are they, the people, so helpless? Where are those millions of dollars that their country receives each year specifically to further their country’s development? Why is there so little on the ground to show as a result? It is time to seek answers of these questions and those in power must answer to their people.

Contrary to their people’s great expectations of economic, social and political change, corruption and the abuse of power by politicians and authorities in the country have continued unabated. Their political culture has remained largely unchanged even since the country became a federal republic. The politicians seem ever ready to sacrifice political agendas and ideologies for the sake of personal financial gain. Unlimited amounts of public money are distributed every day to relatives and supporters of their leaders in the name of politics. The criminalization of politics and the politicization of crime have become everyday realities. The relationship between politicians and mafia gangs has become a common phenomenon, and it is hard today to distinguish between politicians and criminals. Public contracts are let to criminal gangs as a bargain for len-den, (the practice of give and take) and politicians and public officials profit by using their power to influence government financial decisions that suit the interests of criminals. They must ask themselves an important question today: Is their country not turning into a mafia state controlled by a deadly nexus of politicians and criminals?

Critics argue that the lust for money and power drives politics just as much as it does crime and that politics and crime together form an almost symbiotic relationship. Politicians need money to win elections, and they may pay little attention to where it comes from. On the other hand, criminals need the protection of politicians if their continued enterprises are to flourish. At times, politics and crime semi-publicly fuse to form a single corrupt state, and that is just what appears to be taking place in their own country today.

It would appear to be not so much that the criminals are taking over the state by bribery or extortion, but that the state is taking control of the criminal networks, not to eliminate them, but to control and use them to benefit criminalized government elite.

From releasing jailed murderers and smugglers (and even clearing the latter’s confiscated property) to selling off government-owned corporations, their political leaders view each as an opportunity to make a huge profit. The criminalization of the state that is taking place in their country is like a cancer that has no cure.

Again there are important questions to answer. At a time when adults and children are dying in their country because they cannot afford a paracetamol tablet, and many are dying because of food shortages, should they not consider the recent move by the government to be the imposition of a mafia style grip on the economy, enabling politicians to share public money among themselves? Does it not amount to open looting of public property at a time when over sixty per cent the population is living in poverty?

The politicians have cheated their people so often despite their promises during election campaigns. Moreover, their bureaucracy is even worse: no public work proceeds without the bribery of officials at every level including even in the Court of Justice. The politics of patronage, exclusion and violence have been allowed to fester at the expense of people’s expectations for a better life. As a result, their hard-earned democracy itself is now in mortal danger.

Clean the Politics

After the huge public outcry over the recent decision by the government to provide lifetime facilities for Nepalese VIPs, a few leaders rushed to hand in their state-owned vehicles while others declared that they would not be accepting such facilities. Nepali Congress Vice President Ram Chandra Poudel returned the Scorpio jeep that he was using in his capacity of former Speaker.

United Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal aka Prachanda, Nepal Communist Party United Marxist Leninist leader Madhav Kumar Nepal, and a few other so-called VIPs also returned their state-owned vehicles in the wake of growing public resentment. However, is that really enough? Does rejection of a lifetime’s worth of free dinners from the state or the return of public property to the state go anywhere near to solving the immense problems of on-going open corruption and ‘looting’ of public property and money?

At least the return of a few vehicles by the politicians concerned is confirming evidence of their involvement in the great share-out of the fruits of the state. However, where was the moral and ethical conduct of their leaders even to permit it in the first place? If morality and conscience had been awake, one probably would not have the widespread corruption that exists today. Is it not the time now to establish strong ethical and moral principles in the conduct of their politics? Is it not time to find a long-term solution to these recurring problems? Can simply returning a few vehicles to the state achieve anything beyond a few cheap newspaper headlines?

The mother of all battles is still to be fought in their country. The root cause of chronic corruption must be identified and a long-term solution adopted. Political commitment, strong legal instruments, and strong enforcement mechanisms are vital in order to bring about change. However, a strong civil society is the first essential if they are to fight effectively against corruption and the misuse of power. They need it now if they are to change and shape the incentives for our political leaders so that they favour a new regime of governance.

Percy Bysshe Shelley, the poet and philosopher, once wrote: ‘Power, like a desolating pestilence, pollutes whatever it touches.’ The first essential for them is to clean up their politics. If their politics remains dirty every sector of our governance will remain dirty. They need urgently to build towards the establishment of politics based on moral and ethical values. Selfless service must become the norm of everyday politics in Nepal, and the cycle of deadly bonds between politicians and criminals must be immediately ended. They must encourage ethically minded leaders to instigate the desired structural and system changes, and to promote a culture of integrity, transparency and accountability. The transformation of their state into a mafia raj must be halted without delay.

Dr Gyan Basnet, who holds a Ph.D. and an LL.M degree in International Human Rights Law at Lancaster University, U.K, is a Prominent Columnist, Researcher in International Human Rights Law and a Human Rights and Constitutional Law Lawyer in the Supreme Court and Subordinate Court of Nepal. Email: [email protected].

One thought on “Nepal: Democracy In Mortal Danger – OpEd

  • August 12, 2012 at 3:52 am

    Nepal is a country where The Buddha was born at its southern plains. It is a place where Buddhists world wide visit and pay respects day and night, and in all seasons. When looking at the Buddhist historical texts majority of the Buddha’s followers were Nepalis. Thousands and thousands of Shakyan and Koliyan clans turned into Buddha’s followers and many of them are Perfectly Enlightened Ones! The Buddha’s fundamental Teachings based on the practice of morality should be restored in this country. People who govern the nation should be aware of this. ‘The Birthplace of The Buddha is a pride of Nepal’, just saying is not enough. They should also understand the Buddha’s practice on four sublime Brahma Viharas: loving kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity. All these purified mind states lead to ‘PEACE”. Buddha taught many of his followers not to do the deeds which are harmful to oneself, to the others and to both. How would it be beneficial and happiness would be occurred to the whole nation of present day Nepalis if they follow the Teachings of the Gautama Buddha, a Nepali who was born in Nepal.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *